Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-fscjk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T14:35:51.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Slow Twin Conception at First Birth and Subsequent Maternal Twin Proneness in a Natural Fertility Population*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

K. Nonaka ,
B. Desjardins ,
H. Charbonneau ,
J. Légaré  and
T. Miura
K. Nonaka*
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
B. Desjardins
Affiliation:
Programme de recherche en demographie historique (PRDH), Départment de Démographie Université de Montréal, Canada
H. Charbonneau
Affiliation:
Programme de recherche en demographie historique (PRDH), Départment de Démographie Université de Montréal, Canada
J. Légaré
Affiliation:
Programme de recherche en demographie historique (PRDH), Départment de Démographie Université de Montréal, Canada
T. Miura
Affiliation:
Department of Hygiene, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan
*
Department of Hygiene, Teikyo University School of Medicine, Itaba-shi-ku, Tokyo 173, Japan. e-mail: [email protected].

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

To study whether apparently more fecund women having delivered twins at first birth have traits of higher twin-proneness, we performed a retrospective cohort study on population-based historical vital records of the 17-18th century French Canadian immigrants and their descendants under natural fertility conditions. Among 24896 mothers who had at least one child, 248 had twin maternities at their first birth (twinning rate = 1.0%). Among 21508 mothers with a valid marriage-first birth interval, twinning rate was 0.97% among prompt conceptions (7.0-11.0 months), with a particularly high rate at the interval of 7.0-8.0 months (2.2%). Marriages in August-October resulted in a higher twinning rate particularly for the slow conceptions than those in the other seasons. Promptly-conceived mothers of twins at the first delivery may seem to have higher fecundity, but subsequent births from these mothers (n = 88) show a lower twinning rate (1.7%) particularly at younger maternal age than from the other mothers who had slowly conceived twins at their first birth (n = 112). The latter show a 4.5% twinning rate as a whole among their second or later births. So-called twin-proneness of a mother, whether genetic or acquired, was not connected to higher conception rate of twin's mothers immediately after marriage. Reduced fecundity, which may have been imposed by some environmental factors, could raise the chance of twinning.

Keywords

TwinningFecundityNatural fertilitySubfertilityFirst birth intervalGeneticsTwin-pronenessSeason
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 44 , Issue 3-4 , October 1995 , pp. 215 - 222
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1995

Footnotes

*

Presented at the Eighth International Congress on Twin Studies, May 28 - June 1, Richmond, USA.

References

REFERENCES

1. Allen, G (1981): The twinning and fertility paradox. In (eds): Twin Research 3: Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R. Liss, Inc., pp 1–13.Google Scholar
2. Allen, G, Schachter, J (1971): Ease of conception in mothers of twins. Soc Biol 18: 18–27.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3. Bulmer, MG (1958): The numbers of human multiple births. Ann hum Genet 22: 158–164.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bulmer, MG (1970): The biology of Twinning in Man, London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
5. Charbonneau, H (1979): Les regimes de fecondité naturelle en Amerique du nord: Bilan et analyse des observations. In Leridon, H, Menken, J (eds): Natural Fertility. Liege, Belgium: Ordina Editions, pp 441–491.Google Scholar
6. Check, JH, Chase, JS, Adelson, HG, Lauer, C, Schubert, B (1993): A conservative treatment protocol with human menopausal gonadotropins aimed at reducing multiple births. J Perinat Med 21: 315–319.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7. Chenevix-Trench, G, Healey, S, Martin, NG (1993): Reproductive hormone genes in mothers of spontaneous dizygotic twins: An association study. Hum Genet 91: 118–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Eriksson, AW, Fellman, J (1967): Twinning and legitimacy. Hereditas 57: 395–402.Google Scholar
9. Friedler, S, Mashiach, S, Laufer, N (1992): Births in Israel resulting from in-vitro fertilization/embryo transfer, 1982-1989: National registry of the Israeli association for fertility research. Hum Reprod 7: 1159–1163.Google Scholar
10. Jongbloet, PH (1993): Discrimination between two competing hypotheses on seasonality of birth in subfecundability traits. Medical Hypotheses 40: 211–216.Google Scholar
11. Légaré, J (1990): A population register for Canada under the French regime: Context, scope, content, and applications. Can Stud Popul 15: 1–16.Google Scholar
12. Lloyd, OL, Lloyd, MM, Williams, FLR, Lawson, A (1988): Twinning in human populations and in cattle exposed to air pollution from incinerators. Br J Ind Med 45: 556–560.Google Scholar
13. Martin, NG (1991): Excessive follicular recruitment and growth in mothers of spontaneous dizygotic twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 40: 291–301.Google ScholarPubMed
14. Miura, T, Kawana, H, Nonaka, K (1987): Twinning in New England in the 17-19th centuries. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36: 355–364.Google Scholar
15. Miura, T, Nakamura, I, Shimura, M, Nonaka, K, Amau, Y (1984): Twinning rate by month of mother's birth in lapan. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 125–130.Google Scholar
16. Miura, T, Nonaka, K, Shimura, M, Nakamura, I (1983): A study of the sex ratio of first-born according to the mother's month of birth. Arch Gynecol 233: 263–266.Google Scholar
17. Miura, T, Shimura, M (1980): The relation between seasonal birth variation and the season of the mother's birth. Arch Gynecol 229: 115–122.Google Scholar
18. Nakamura, I, Uno, m, Io, Y, Ikeshita, I, Nonaka, K, Miura, T (1990): Seasonality in early loss of one fetus among twin pregnancies. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 39: 339–344.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Nonaka, K, Desjardins, B, Legare, J, Charbonneau, H, Miura, T (1990): Effects of maternal birth season on birth seasonality in the Canadian population during the seventeenth and eighteenth centuries. Hum Biol 62: 701–717.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Nonaka, K, Miura, T (1987): Incidence of twinning in London from 1581 to 1760. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36: 355–364.Google ScholarPubMed
21. Paraskevaides, EC, Pennington, GW, Naik, S (1988): Seasonal distribution in conceptions achieved by artificial insemination by donor. Br Med I 297: 1309–1310.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
22. Richter, J, Miura, T, Nakamura, I, Nonaka, K (1984): Twinning rates and seasonal changes in Gorlitz, Germany, from 1611-1860. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33: 121–124.Google Scholar
23. Weinberg, CR, Moledor, E, Baird, DD, Wilcox, AJ (1994): Is there a seasonal pattern in risk of early pregnancy loss? Epidemiology 5: 484–489.Google Scholar
24. Wyshak, G (1969): Intervals between births in families containing one set of twins. J biosoc Sci 1: 337–351.Google Scholar
25. Wyshak, G, White, C (1969): Fertility of twins and parent of twins. Hum Biol 41: 66–82.Google Scholar