Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:53:32.979Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Pseudo-Pseudo Male Hermaphroditism with Auto-Gonosomic Mosaic

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

L. Gedda*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica Medica e Gemellologia, «G. Mendel», Roma
G. Torrioli-Riggio*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica Medica e Gemellologia, «G. Mendel», Roma
G. Del Porto*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica Medica e Gemellologia, «G. Mendel», Roma
L. Silvani*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Genetica Medica e Gemellologia, «G. Mendel», Roma
*
Istituto Mendel, Piazza Galeno 5, Roma, Italia
Istituto Mendel, Piazza Galeno 5, Roma, Italia
Istituto Mendel, Piazza Galeno 5, Roma, Italia
Istituto Mendel, Piazza Galeno 5, Roma, Italia

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A case of apparent pseudo-hermaphroditism is described, which seems to represent a new kind of genital pathology. The phenotypic (genital ambiguity) and genotypic (mosaicism of both autosomes and gonosomes) alterations are interpreted as the result of a series of clonal errors of mitosis in the ontogenetic development of a Xy zygote, due to mutant genes for the control of mitosis.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1969

References

Bibliografia

Bain, A. D., Scott, J. S. (1965). Mixed gonadal dysgenesis with XX/XY mosaicism. Lancet, 7394: 1035.Google Scholar
Boschetti, R., Gilbertas, A., Noel, B., Quack, B. (1968). Pseudo-hermaphroditisme masculin et mosaïque 45, X/46, XY de 46, XX q. Ann. Genet. (Paris), 11: 6265.Google Scholar
Chicago Conference 1966. Standardization in Human Cytogenetics. Birth Defects Original Article Series II, 2. The National Foundation, New York.Google Scholar
Eriksson, B., Fraccaro, M., Hulten, M., Lindsten, J., Tiepolo, L. (1968). Unusual chromosomal mosaic (46, XX/46, XX Cp +) in a girl with multiple malformations. Ann. Genet. (Paris), 11: 610.Google Scholar
Ferrier, P. E., Kelley, V. C. (1967). Influence of the Y chromosome on gonadal differentiation: asimmetrical gonads in an XO/XY mosaic. J. Med. Genet., 4: 288.Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Calabresi, F., Del Porto, G., Del Porto-Mercuri, A., Alfieri, A., Torrioli-Riggio, G., Romei, L. (1967 a). On a case of rare chromosomal aberration. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 16: 1.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Gedda, L., Torrioli-Riggio, G., Romei, L., Alfieri, A., Calabresi, F., Del Porto, G., Gentile, R. (1967 b). A case of familial chromosomal aberration with A group mosaic. Acta Genet. Med. Gemellol., 16: 8.Google Scholar
Job, J. C. (1966). 20 observations XO/XY variabilité du phénotype. Pediatrie, 23: 297.Google Scholar
Job, J. C., Canlorbe, P., De Grouchy, J., Cendron, J., Rossier, A. (1966). Mosaïques cellulaires XO/XY. Arch. Franc. Pediat., 23: 297.Google ScholarPubMed
Marigold, J., Thorburn, C., Miller, G., Dovey, P. (1967). Anomalies of development in a girl with unusual sex chromosomal mosaicism. J. Med. Genet., 4: 283.Google Scholar
Nicoletti, B. (1968). Il controllo genetico della meiosi. Atti A.G.I., 3: 71.Google Scholar