Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-7cvxr Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-26T15:05:06.169Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perinatal Mortality in Multiple Pregnancy Patients

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

F.P. Meehan ,
I.M. Magani  and
G. Mortimer
F.P. Meehan*
Affiliation:
Celtic International Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Galway, Ireland
I.M. Magani
Affiliation:
Celtic International Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Galway, Ireland
G. Mortimer
Affiliation:
Celtic International Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College Galway, Ireland
*
Celtic International Clinical Research Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University College, Galway, Ireland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A study of perinatal mortality in multiple pregnancy over a period of 12 years, 1972 to 1984, showed prematurity and low birthweight as the major causes of fetal loss. The highest risk was found at 28 to 30 weeks gestation (306/1,000). There was a significantly greater risk to babies delivered by the breech (136/1,000), and likewise in the second twin when compared with the first, ratio 1:1.4. A significant drop in the perinatal mortality rate, from 98/1,000 to 39/1,000, was observed between 1972-1978 and 1979-1984. Ultrasound has facilitated the earlier diagnosis of twins and provides more accurate serial fetal assessment. Bedrest, more vigilant antenatal care, intrapartum surveillance and improved neonatal care, are required to maintain and further reduce the perinatal mortality rate. When regional analgesia was employed in labour, the number of babies lost was 41/1,000, vs 93/1,000 in patients not receiving regional analgesia. External cephalic version and vertex delivery of the second twin is preferable to internal version and breech extraction. It should also be contemplated, as an alternative to elective cesarean section for a transverse lie or brrech presentation of the second fetus.

Keywords

Perinatal mortalityMultiple pregnancyPrematurityBirthweightBreechRegional analgesiaUltrasound
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 37 , Issue 3-4 , October 1988 , pp. 331 - 337
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1. Berger, GS, Keith, LG, Ellis, R, Depp, R, Keith, DM (1981): The Northwestern Univesity Multihospital Twin Study. III. Obstetric characteristics and outcome. In Gedda, et al (eds): Twin Research 3: Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R. Liss, pp 207–215.Google Scholar
2. DeMuylder, X, Moutquin, JM, Desgranges, MF Leduc, B, Lazaro-Lopez, F (1982): Obstetrical profile of twin pregnancies: A retrospective review of 11 years (1969-1979) at Höpital Notre-Dame, Montreal, Canada. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 31: 149–155.Google Scholar
3. Ellis, RF, Berger, GS, Keith, L, Depp, R (1979): The Northwestern University Multihospital Twin Study. II. Mortality of first versus second twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28: 347–352.Google Scholar
4. Erkkola, R, Ala-Mellos, S, Kero, P, Sillanpaa, M (1985): Fetal growth and perinatal mortality in twin pregnancy - Effects of sick leave and hospitalization. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 23:115–120.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Eskes, TKAB, Timmer, H, Kollee, LAA, Jongsma, HW (1984): The second twin. Europ J Obstet Gynec Reprod Biol 19: 159–166.Google Scholar
6. Grothe, W, Ruttgers, H (1985): Twin pregnancies: An 11-year review. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34: 49–58.Google Scholar
7. Hartikainen-Sorri, AL, Kauppila, A, Tuimala, R, Koivisto, M (1983): Factors related to an improved outcome for twins. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand 62: 23–25.Google Scholar
8. Hughey, MJ, Olive, DL (1985): Routine ultrasound scanning for the detection and management of twin pregnancies. J Reprod Med 30: 427–430.Google ScholarPubMed
9. Karovits, J, Dobos, A, Juhasz, Gy, Kinsces, Zs, Molnar, M (1985): General anaesthesia or epidural block for Caesarean section. In Gati, I (ed): Recent Progress in Perinatal Medicine. Volume IV.Google Scholar
10. MacGillivray, I, Campbell, DM (1981): The outcome of pregnancies in Aberdeen. In Gedda, et al (eds): Twin Research 3: Twin Biology and Multiple Pregnancy. New York: Alan R Liss, pp 203–206.Google Scholar
11. Meehan, FP (1987) Historical review of caudal epidural analgesia in obstetrics. Midwifery 3: 39–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12. Meehan, FP, Magani, IM (1988): True rupture of the Caesarean section scar (a 15 year review 1972-1987). European Journal of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Biology. Accepted for Publication, 06 1988.Google Scholar
13. Nnatu, S (1985): Presentation in twin pregnancy. J Obstet Gynaecol 6: 35–37.Google Scholar
14. O'Connor, MC, Arias, E, Royston, JP, Dalrymple, IJ (1981): The merits of special antenatal care for twin pregnancies. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 88: 222–230.Google Scholar
15. Olofsson, P, Rydhstron, H (1985): Twin delivery: How should the second twin be delivered? Am J Obstet Gynecol 153: 479–481.Google Scholar
16. Osbourne, GK, Patel, MB (1985): An assessment of perinatal mortality in twin pregnancies in Dundee. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 34: 193–199.Google ScholarPubMed
17. Papiernik, E, Mussy, MA, Vial, M, Tichard, A (1985): A low rate of perinatal deaths for twin births. Act. Genet Med Gemellol 34: 201–206.Google Scholar
18. Persson, PH, Grennert, L (1979): Towards a normalization of the outcome of twin pregnancy. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 28: 341–346.Google ScholarPubMed
19. Powers, WF (1973): Twin pregnancy. Complications and treatment. Obstet Gynecol 42:795–808.Google ScholarPubMed
20. Puissant, F, Leroy, F (1982): A reappraisal of perinatal mortality factors in twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 21: 213–219.Google Scholar
21. Young, BK, Suidan, J, Antoine, C, Silverman, F, Lustig, I, Wasserman, J (1985): Differences in twins: the import ance of birth order. Am J Obstet Gynecol 151: 915–921.Google Scholar