Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-29T02:58:09.890Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Kent-Rosanoff Word Association Test: Aged Twins With and Without Dementia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Louise G. Bettner ,
June E. Blum  and
Lissy F. Jarvik
Louise G. Bettner
Affiliation:
Eden Mental Health Clinic, Alameda County, San Leandro, California
June E. Blum
Affiliation:
Department of Psychiatry, Cornell University Medical College, New York
Lissy F. Jarvik*
Affiliation:
Brentwood Veterans Administration Medical Center and Department of Psychiatry and Biobehavioral Sciences, UCLA, Los Angeles, California
*
530/151E Brentwood VA Medical Center, 11301 Wilshire Boulevard, Los Angeles, California 90073

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

As part of a long-range study on mental functioning in old age, 53 twins (mean age 84 years) were given the Kent-Rosanoff Word Association test, a test which measures the cognitive ability to give discrete verbal association to common stimulus words. In general, the results obtained with the aging twins were similar to those previously reported for young adults tested in the early 20th century, nearly 90% of the responses being found in the 1910 Kent-Rosanoff norm tables. Our results are consistent with the trend reported in the literature toward diminished primary responses with advancing age. Unlike reports in the literature, however, the present study detected no sex differences, possibly due to the small sample size (18 men and 35 women). Moreover, Kent-Rosanoff performance was not significantly related to organic brain syndrome, as measured by psychiatric evaluation, Graham-Kendall Memory-for-Designs test, and Stroop-Color-Word test, possibly because most of the twins were diagnosed as having only a “mild” or “moderate” degree of impairment. The intraclass correlations were higher for MZ than DZ twin partners, the differences reaching statistical significance for two scoring categories, primary and unusual responses. Even though the sample was small, only six DZ and 12 MZ pairs, this finding suggests a possible hereditary component in the verbal associative behavior of octogenarians.

Keywords

AgingKent-Rosanoff word association testDementiaTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 31 , Issue 1-2 , January 1982 , pp. 1 - 7
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1982

References

REFERENCES

1. American Psychiatric Association (1980): Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 3rd Ed. (DSM-III), Washington, D.C., Task Force on Nomenclature and Statistics, American Psychiatric Association, pp 111–112.Google Scholar
2. Appelbaum, SA (1963): The expanded word association test as a measure of psychological deficit associated with brain damage. J Clin Psychol, 19:78–84.Google Scholar
3. Bachrach, H (1971): Studies in the expanded word association test: I. Effects of cerebral dysfunction. J Pers Assess 35:148–158.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
4. Bank, LI, Jarvik, LF (1978): A longitudinal study of aging human twins. In Schneider, EL (ed): “The Genetics of Aging.” New York: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
5. Bettner, LG, Jarvik, LF, Blum, JE (1971): Stroop Color-Word test, nonpsychotic organic brain syndrome and chromosome loss in aged twins. J Gerontol 26:458–469.Google Scholar
6. Blum, JE, Jarvik, JF, Clark, ET (1971): Rate of Change on Selective Tests of Intelligence: A Twenty-Year Longitudinal Study of Aging. J Gerontology 25:171–176.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
7. Blum, JE, Clark, ET, Jarvik, LF (1973): The New York State Psychiatric Institute Study of aging twins. In: Jarvik, LF, Eisdorfer, C, Blum, J (eds): “Intellectual Functioning in Adults.” pp. 13–19. New York: Springer Publishing Co.Google Scholar
8. Buchwald, AM (1957): The generality of the norms of word associations. Am J Psychol, 70:233–237.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Clark, EO (1981): “Semantic and Episodic Memory Impairment in Old Age.” Unpublished dissertation, New York University.Google Scholar
10. Cramer, P (1968): “Word Association.” New York: Academic Press.Google ScholarPubMed
11. Feingold, L (1950): “A Psychometric Study of Senescent Twins.” Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Columbia University.Google Scholar
12. Fernandez Trespalacios, JL (1976): A comparative study of verbal associations in North Americans and Spaniards. Rev Psicol General y Aplicada 31:185–194.Google Scholar
13. Goldfarb, A (1964): The evaluation of geriatric patients following treatment. In Hoch, PH, Zubin, J (eds): “The Evaluation of Psychiatric Treatment.” New York: Grune & Stratton, Inc., pp 271–380.Google Scholar
14. Graham, FK, Kendall, BS (1960): Memory-for-designs test: Revised general manual. Percept Motor Skills. Monograph Supplement 2-VII: 147–188.Google Scholar
15. Hasher, L, Zaks, RT (1979): Automatic and effortful processes in memory. J Exp Psychol: [Gen], 108:356–388.Google Scholar
16. Horton, DL, Marlowe, D, Crowne, DP (1963): The effect of instructional set and need for social approval on commonality of word association responses. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 66:67–72.Google Scholar
17. Innes, JM (1972): The relationship of word-association commonality response set to cognitive and personality variables. Br J Psychol 63:421–428.Google Scholar
18. Janowsky, DS, Huey, L, Storms, LJ, Lewis, L (1977): Methylphenidate hydrochloride effects on psychological tests in acute schizophrenia and nonpsychotic patients. Arch Gen Psychiatry 34:189–194.Google Scholar
19. Jarvik, LF, Kallmann, FJ, Falek, A, Klaber, MM (1957): Changing intellectual functions in senescent twins. Acta Genet Statist Med 7:421–430.Google Scholar
20. Jarvik, LF, Altshuler, KZ, Kato, T, Blumner, B (1971): Organic brain syndrome and chromosome loss in aged twins. Dis Nerv Syst 32:159–170.Google Scholar
21. Jarvik, LF, Blum, JE, Varma, AO (1972): Genetic components and intellectual functioning during senescence: A 20-year study of aging twins. Behav Genet 2:159–171.Google Scholar
22. Jarvik, LF, Ruth, V, Matsuyama, S (1980): Organic brain syndrome and aging, a six-year follow-up of surviving twins. Arch Gen Psychiatry 36:280–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
23. Jenkins, JJ (1959): Effects on word association of the set to give popular responses. Psychol Rep 5:94.Google Scholar
24. Jenkins, JJ, Russell, WA (1960): Systematic changes in word association norms: 1910–1952. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 60:292–303.Google Scholar
25. Kallmann, FJ, Sander, G (1948): Twin studies on aging and longevity. J Hered 39:349–357.Google Scholar
26. Kallmann, FJ, Sander, G (1949): Twin studies on senescence. Am J Psychiatry 106:29–36.Google Scholar
27. Kallman, FJ, Feingold, L, Bondy, E (1951): Comparative adaptational, social, and psychometric data on life histories of senescent twin pairs. Am J Human Genet 3:65–73.Google Scholar
28. Kent, GH, Rosanoff, AS (1910): A study of association in insanity. Am J Insan 67:37–96, 126–142, and 317–390.Google Scholar
29. Mann, HB, Whitney, DR (1947): On a test of whether one of two random variables is stochastically longer than the other. Ann Math Stat 18:50–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Mintz, S (1969): Effect of actual stress on word associations. J Abnorm Psychol 74:293–295.Google Scholar
31. Moran, LJ (1966): Generality of word association response sets. Psychol Monographs 80:No. 4 (Whole No. 612).Google Scholar
32. Namyslowska, I (1975): Thought disorders in schizophrenia before and after pharmacological treatment. Comp Psychiatry 16:37–42.Google Scholar
33. Riegel, KF (1965): Age and cultural differences as determinants of word associations: Suggestions for their analysis. Psychol Rep 16:75–78.Google Scholar
34. Riegel, KF, Birren, JH (1965): Age differences in associative behavior. J Gerontol 20:125–130.Google Scholar
35. Ries, HA (1968): Commonality of word associations and length of hospitalization in neurotics and schizophrenics. J Consult Clin Psychol 32:722–724.Google Scholar
36. Ries, HA, Johnson, MH (1967): Commonality of word associations in good and poor premorbid schizophrenics. J Abnorm Psychol 72:487–488.Google Scholar
37. Rosenzweig, MR (1964): Word associations of French workmen: Comparisons with associations of French students and American workmen and students. J Verbal Learning Verbal Behav 3:57–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
38. Saltz, H (1961): The effect of induced stress on free associations. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62:161–164.Google Scholar
39. Sarason, IG (1961): A note on anxiety, instruction and word association performance. J Abnorm Soc Psychol 62:153–154.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
40. Shakow, D, Jellinek, HM (1965): Composite index of the Kent-Rosanoff Free Association test. J Abnorm Psychol 70:403–404.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41. Smith-Meyer, H, Valen, HA, Flekkoy, K, et al (1976): Psychophysiological studies of a geographically defined population. Acta Nerv Super (Praha), 18(3): 145–156.Google Scholar
42. Sommer, R, Dewar, R, Osmond, H (1960): Is there a schizophrenic language? Arch Gen Psychiatry 3:665–673.Google Scholar
43. Stroop, JR (1935): Studies of interference in serial verbal reactions. J Exper Psycho 18:643–662.Google Scholar
44. Tresselt, MH, Leeds, DS, Mayzner, MS (1955): The Kent-Rosanoff word association: II. A comparison of six differences in response frequencies. J Genet Psychol 87:149–154.Google Scholar
45. Tresselt, MH, Mayzner, MS (1964): The Kent-Rosanoff word association: Word association norms as a function of age. Psychonom Sci 1:65–66.Google Scholar
46. Tulving, E (1972): Episodic and semantic memory. In Tulving, E, Donaldson, W, (eds): “Organization of Memory.” New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
47. Upamanyu, VV (1975): A study of emotional indicators in high anxious and low anxious subjects. Indian J App Psychol 12:49–54.Google Scholar
48. Wittels, I (1972): Age and stimulus meaningfulness in paired-associate learning. J Gerontol 27:372–375.Google Scholar
49. Wynne, RD, Schiffman, H, Gerjuoy, H (1967): Word association: Variables affecting popular-response frequency. Psychol Rep 20:423–432.Google Scholar