Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:03:13.268Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Indagine sulla mortalità dei gemelli nel primo anno di vita: Ricerca anagrafica su 848 gemelli nati a Catania

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Antonino Fiumara*
Affiliation:
Istituto di Anatomia e Istologia Patologica dell'Università di Catania (Italia)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A survey has been made of the birth records of 846 twins (415 pairs and 6 sets of triplets) born in Catania between January 1st, 1959 and May 31st, 1962, with the purpose of establishing the degree of mortality in twins in the first year of life. The results indicate a low degree of still-birth (5%). Identifying the neonatal period with the first week of life, the neonatal mortality is of 8.9%. This percentage undergoes a little reduction (1.9%) when we consider as neonatal period just the first day of life, the twin mortality being lower in the subsequent days of the first week. Except that of the 1st day, the higher frequency of mortality (19%) occurs between the 12th and the 16th day, which is considered a critical period in the first month of life in twins. In the remaining 11 months of the year the mortality degre is low (51 deaths in 680 twins survived to the first month). At the end of the year in 63.1% of the considered pairs both twins were still alive. In six of the 43 pairs with both components dead, both twins died between the 13th and the 25th day, with an interval of 24 hours. The spontaneous death of twin pairs, occurring sometimes simultaneously or with a brief interval in the first month of life, may give rise to judiciary mistakes.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1963

References

Bibliografia

Allen, G.: A. Ge. Me. Ge., IV, 1955.Google Scholar
Calzolari, C.: Arcisp. S. Anna, 4, 11, 1951.Google Scholar
Clure Me, M. I.: Ulster Med. J., 6, 284. 1937 Google Scholar
Essen-Möller, E.: cit. da Gedda (1951), p. 166.Google Scholar
Fiumara, A.: A. Ge. Me. Ge., I, XII, 1963.Google Scholar
Gedda, L., Poggi, : A. Ge. Me. Ge., 271, IX, 1960.Google Scholar
Karn, M. N.: A. Ge. Me. Ge., 152, II, 1953.Google Scholar
Luxenburger, H.: cit. da Gedda (1961) p. 164.Google Scholar
Orel, H.: cit. da Gedda (1951) p. 359.Google Scholar
Record, R. G., Gibson, J. R., Mc Keown, T.: J. Obst. Gynec., 59, 471, 1952.Google Scholar
Somaglia, C.: Rass. di ostet. e ginec., 25, 47, 1938.Google Scholar
Strandskov, H., Askin, J.E.: A. Ge. Me. Ge., 164, 2, 1953.Google Scholar