Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:05:13.540Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Heredity and Environment in Phoneme Articulation: Hereditary and Environmental Contributions to Articulation Proficiency

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

W. E. Dixon Jr. ,
A. P. Matheny Jr.  and
S. R. Mohr
W. E. Dixon Jr.*
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Heidelberg College, Tiffin, Ohio, USA
A. P. Matheny Jr.
Affiliation:
Louisville Twin Study, University of Louisville, Louisville, USA
S. R. Mohr
Affiliation:
Department of Psychology, Heidelberg College, Tiffin, Ohio, USA
*
Department of Psychology, Heidelberg College, Tiffin, OH 44883. E-mail address: [email protected].

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

Large twin samples and recent applications of multiple regression techniques to behavioral genetics methodology makes possible evaluation of genetic and environmental contributions to the articulation proficiency of individual phonemes. Factor analysis of the articulation scores from 256 MZ and DZ twins and 124 of their non-twin siblings (all children ranged from 2; 11 to 9; 8 years) were conducted to reduce a 50-item articulation test to a more manageable set of five articulation factors. The twins' factor scores were then analyzed using multiple regression procedures to determine the extent to which the individual factors resulted from genetic and/or environmental influences. The /r/ and /∫, t∫, dƺ/ factors were found to have strong genetic components, while the /l, j, w/ factor was found to be strongly influenced by environmental sources of variation.

Keywords

Articulation proficiencySpeechTwins
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 63 - 73
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1995

References

REFERENCES

1.Atkinson, L (1988): The measurement-statistics controversy: Factor analysis and subinterval data. Bull Psychon Soc 26: 361–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
2.Cherny, SS, DeFries, JC, Fulker, DW (1992): Multiple regression analysis of twin data: a model-fitting approach. Behav Gen 22: 489–497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3.DeFries, JC, Fulker, DW (1985): Multiple regression analysis of twin data. Behav Genet 15; 5: 467–473.Google Scholar
4.Leonard, LB, Newhoff, M, Mesalam, L (1980): Individual differences in early child phonology. Appl Psycholinguistics 1: 7–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Lewis, BA, Thompson, LA (1992): A study of developmental speech and language disordersin twins. J Speech Hear Res 35: 1086–1094.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6.Locke, JL, Mather, PL (1989): Genetic factors in the ontogeny of spoken language: evidence from monozygotic and dizygotic twins. J Child Language 16: 553–559.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
7.Matheny, AP Jr, Bruggemann, CE (1972): Articulation proficiency in twins and singletons from families of twins. J Speech Hear Res 15: 845–851.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8.Matheny, AP Jr, Bruggemann, CE (1973): Children's speech: hereditary components and sex differences. Folia Phoniatr 25: 442–449.Google Scholar
9.Mather, PL, Black, KN (1984): Hereditary and environmental influences on preschool twins' language skills. Dev Psychol 20: 303–308.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
10.McReynolds, LV, Elbert, MF (1981): Generalization of correct articulation in clusters. App Psycholinguistics 2: 119–132.Google Scholar
11.Plomin, R, DeFries, JC, McClearn, GE (1990): Behavioral Genetics: A Primer (2nd Ed). New York: Freeman.Google Scholar
12.Ritterman, SI, Zook-Herman, SL, Carlson, RL, Kinde, SW (1982): The pass/fail disparity among three commonly employed articulatory screening tests. J Speech Hear Disord 47: 429–433.Google Scholar
13.Templin, MC, Darley, F (1969): The Templin-Darley Tests of Articulation. Iowa City, IA: Bureau of Educational Research and Service Extensions Division, University of Iowa.Google Scholar