Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-lj6df Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:17:03.143Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Four-Year Follow-up of Locomotor and Language Development in 34 Twin Pairs

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

B. Alin Åkerman  and
P.A. Thomassen
B. Alin Åkerman*
Affiliation:
Department of Special Education, School of Education, Stockholm, Sweden
P.A. Thomassen
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Karolinska Hospital, Stockholm, Sweden
*
Fiskargatan 14, S-116 45 Stockholm, Sweden

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A group of 34 twin pairs was studied at four years of age. Characteristics of the group were a homogeneous social background, good parental interrelationship and conscientious care during pregnancy, delivery and the neonatal period. All the children were tested with the Griffiths' Mental Development Scales. The girls generally showed a higher development quotient than the boys. Birth weight seemed to be the most important factor; at 4 years of age, the twins with a birth weight of less than 2500 grams had a significantly lower locomotor quotient. The langage quotient showed a similar trend. This difference was, however, not significant. No significant differences in either locomotor or language development could be observed between MZ and DZ twins.

Keywords

Locomotor developmentLanguage developmentMental developmentTwinsPrematurity
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 40 , Issue 1 , January 1991 , pp. 21 - 27
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1991

References

REFERENCES

1.Alin Åkerman, B (1987): The expectation and parentage of twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:225–232.Google Scholar
2.Bakker, P (1987): Autonomous language of twins. Rome: Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:233–238.Google ScholarPubMed
3.Bryan, E (1983): The Nature and Nurture of Twins. London: Baillière Tindall.Google Scholar
4.Bulmer, MG (1970): The Biology of Twinning in Man. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
5.Dales, RJ (1969): Motor and language development of twins during the first three years. J Genet Psychol 114:263–271.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Drillien, CM (1964): The Growth and Development of the Prematurely Born Infant. Edinburgh and London: Ed. S Livingstone Ltd.Google Scholar
7.Hay, DA, Prior, M, Collett, S & Williams, M (1987): Speech and language development in preschool twins. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 36:213–223.Google ScholarPubMed
8.Enocksson, Eet al. (1985): A sprospective study of low birth weight newborn babies shows a low number of handicapped children (in Swedish). Läkartidningen 82:204–205.Google Scholar
9.Griffiths, R (1970): The Abilities of Young Children. London: Child Development Research Centre.Google Scholar
10.Karlberg, Pet al. (1968): The development of children in a Swedish urban community. A prospective longitudinal study I-VI. Acta Ped Scand, Suppl. 187, Stockholm.Google Scholar
11.Kjellmer, I (1985): The prognosis of premature babies (in Swedish). Läkartidningen 82:175–177.Google Scholar
12.Lagercrantz, Het al. (1985): Multicenter study of low birth weight babies shows good development at two years follow-up (in Swedish). Läkartidningen 82:175–177.Google Scholar
13.McCarthy, D (1954): Language development in children. In: Carmichael, I (ed): Manual of Child Psychology. New York: Wiley, pp 492–630.Google Scholar
14.Neligan, GAet al. (1976): Born too Soon or Born too Small: A Follow-up Study to Seven Years of Age. London: Spastics International Medical Publication.Google Scholar
15.Nordberg, L, Tingvall, V & Åkerman, Alin (1980): The standardization of the Griffiths' Mental Developmental Scales for the ages two to eight years (in Swedish). Report No. 11 from the Department of Educational Research. School of Education, Stockholm.Google Scholar
16.Savic, S (1980): How Twins Learn to Talk. A Study of the Speech Development of Twins from 1 to 3. London: Academic Press.Google Scholar
17.Wilson, RS (1983): The Louisville Twin Study. Developmental synchronies in behaviour. Child Dev 54:298–316.Google Scholar
18.Wilson, RS (1984): Twins: Genetic Influence on Growth and Maturation. Child Development Unit, University of Louisville.Google Scholar
19.Zazzo, R (1960): Les Jumeaux, le Couple et la Personne. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar