Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-94fs2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-20T01:39:51.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The European Multiple Birth Study (EMBS)

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

R. Vlietinck*
Affiliation:
Centre of Human Genetics, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
E. Papiernik
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hôpital Antoine Béclère, Clamart, France
C. Derom
Affiliation:
Centre of Human Genetics, Catholic University of Leuven, Belgium
H. Grandjean
Affiliation:
Unité de Recherche INSERM 168, Toulouse, France
M. Thiery
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, State University of Gent, Belgium
R. Derom
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics, State University of Gent, Belgium
*
Centre of Human Genetics, Catholic University of Leuven, Herestraat 49, B-3000 Leuven, Belgium

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The more that twin and other multiple pregnancies are investigated, the more it becomes mandatory that collaborative studies are set up in order to attain the criticai number of cases needed to achieve meaningful and reliable results. The European Multiple Birth Study (EMBS) aims to study two aspects of twin and multiple pregnancy: 1) management of pregnancy and labour, with emphasis on the prevention of preterm delivery; 2) accurate determination of zygosity, a prerequisite for the proper use of the twin method in a variety of fields, eg, congenital malformations, genetics, clinical investigations, etc. The rationale, the methods and the organisation of the study are described and discussed.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1988

References

REFERENCES

1.Bleker, OP, Breuer, W, Hindekoper, BL (1979): A study of birthweight, plaeental weight and mortality of twins as compared to singletons. Br J Obstet Gynaecol 86:111118.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
2.Derom, C, Bakker, E, Vlietinck, R, Derom, R, Van den Berghe, H, Thiery, M, Pearson, P (1985): Zygosity determination in newborn twins using DNA variants. J Med Genet 22:279282.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
3.Guiling, H (1984): Genetic epidemiology in medicine. Recent twin research. Br Med J 288:35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4.Henderson, ND (1982): Human behaviour genetics. Annu Rev Psychol 33:403440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
5.Keith, L, Ellis, R, Berger, G, Depp, R (1980): The North Western University Multihospital Twin Study. Am J Obstet Gynecol 138:781789.Google Scholar
6.Layde, PM, Erickson, JD, Falek, A, Mc Carthy, BJ (1980): Congenital malformations in twins. Am J Hum Genet 22:662678.Google Scholar
7.Lee, Ks, Paneth, N, Gartner, LM, Pearlman, M (1980): The very low-bixthweight rate: Principal predictor of neonatal mortality in industiialized population. Pediatrics 97:759764.Google Scholar
8.Nance, WE (1979): The role of twin studies in human quantitative genetics. Prog Med Genet 3: 73107.Google Scholar
9.Papiernik, E (1983): Social cost of twin births. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 32:105111.Google ScholarPubMed
10.Robson, EB, Harris, H (1965): Genetics of the alkaline phosphatase polymorphism of the human placenta. Nature 207:12571259.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Stevenson, AC, Johnston, HA, Stewart, MIP, Golding, DR (1966): Congenital malformations: a report of a study of series of consecutive births in 24 centres. Bull WHO 34 (suppl): 1127.Google ScholarPubMed
12.Tudehope, DI, Sinclair, JC (1977): Birthweight, gestational age and neonatal risk. In Bernham, RE (ed): Neonatal-Perinatal Medicine. St. Louis: CV Mosby, pp 116127.Google Scholar
13.Windham, GC, Bjerkedal, T (1984): Malformations in twins and their siblings, Norway 1967-1979. Acta Genet Med Gemellol 33:8795.Google Scholar