Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T07:08:24.545Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Distinguishing Fetal and Maternal Genetic Effects on Variation in Birth Weight

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

P. Magnus*
Affiliation:
Institute for Medical Genetics, University of Oslo
*
Institute of Medical Genetics, University of Oslo, P.O. Box 1036. Blindern, Oslo 3, Norway

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

In an attempt to uncover the causes of variation in birth weight for 13,970 offspring of MZ and DZ twins, several models were tested. Mean squares from nested analysis of variance were analysed with respect to fetal and maternal effects on variation in birth weight. The major part of the total variation in birth weight was found to be due to effects of genes. The contribution of fetal genes was larger than the contribution of maternal genes. About 11% of the variation could be attributed to effects of interactions between fetal and maternal genes. However, in this data set, the interaction variance could not be distinguished from variance due to fetal dominance or to effects of common environment of sibs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1984

References

REFERENCES

1.Bjerkedal, T (1981): The medical birth registry of Norway. In Mednick, SA, Baert, SA, (eds): Prospective Longitudinal Research: An Empirical Basis for the Primary Prevention of Psychosocial Disorders. Published on behalf of the WHO Regional Office for Europe. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
2.Joreskog, KG, Sorbom, D (1978): LISREL, Analysis of linear structural relationships by the method of maximum likelihood. Version IV. Chicago: International Educational Services.Google Scholar
3.Magnus, P (1984): Causes of variation in birth weight. A study of offspring of twins. Clin Genet, 25:1524.Google Scholar
4.Magnus, P, Berg, K, Nance, WE (1983): Predicting zygosity in Norwegian twin pairs born 1915-1960. Clin Genet 24:103112.Google Scholar
5.Nance, WE, Corey, LA (1976): Genetic models for the analysis of data from the families of identical twins. Genetics 83:811826.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
6.Nance, WE, Corey, LA, Boughman, JA (1978): Monozygotic twin kinships: A new design for genetic and epidemiologic research. In Morton, NE, Chung, CS (eds): Genetic Epidemiology. New York: Academic Press, pp 87132.Google Scholar
7.Penrose, LS (1954): Some recent trends in human genetics. Caryologia (Suppl) 6:521530.Google Scholar
8.Robson, EB (1955): Birth weight in cousins. Ann Hum Genet 19:262268.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed