Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T03:00:47.026Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Cleidocranial dysostosis in a family with twins*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. Spital
Affiliation:
Universitäts-Kinderklinik Münster (Westf.) Humangenetisches Institut der Universität Münster (Westf.)
G. Schellong
Affiliation:
Universitäts-Kinderklinik Münster (Westf.) Humangenetisches Institut der Universität Münster (Westf.)
W. Scholz
Affiliation:
Universitäts-Kinderklinik Münster (Westf.) Humangenetisches Institut der Universität Münster (Westf.)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A family is reported in which 5 individuals out of 2 generations were found to suffer from dysostosis cleidocranialis. In that kindred twins occurred twice, one twin pair being DZ and suffering from the disease, the other pair MZ and healthy. The number of affected family members is in agreement with the autosomal dominance of the trait as indicated by numerous earlier observations. The characteristics found were: reduced growth, macrocephalus with late fontanel occlusion, protrusive frontal bone, hypertelorism, dysplasia of the clavicles and the pelvis, retarded development of hand skeleton. There was a certain variability in the expression of the traits in both DZ twin sisters, particularly concerning the malformation of clavicles and pelvis. Their children showed rather uniform alterations concerning head and hand skeleton, clavicles and pelvis.

Blood group tests performed did not reveal linked inheritance of the pathological trait and any of the used serological markers.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1967

Footnotes

*

Herrn Prof. Dr. O. Frh. v. Verschuer zum 70. Geburtstag in Verehrung gewidmet.

References

Literaturverzeichnis

Degenhardt, K. H. (1964). Mißbildungen des Kopfes und der Wirbelsäule. In: Humangenetik hrsg. von P. E. Becker, II, Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Forland, M. (1962). Cleidocranial dysostosis. A review of the syndrome and report of a sporadic case, with hereditary transmission. Amer. J. Med., 33: 792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Herndon, C. N. (1951). Cleidialdysostosis. Amer. J. Hum. Genet., 3: 314.Google Scholar
Hesse, G. (1925). Dysostosis cleidocranialis unter besonderer Berücksichtigung des Gebisses. Vjschr. Zahnk., 41: 161.Google Scholar
Jackson, W. P. V. (1951). Osteo-dental dysplasia. Acta Med. Scand., 139: 292.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Kahler, O. A. (1939). Beitrag zur Erbpathologie der Dysostosis cleidocranialis. Z. Menschl. Vererb. Konstit. Lehre, 23: 216.Google Scholar
Ladewig, P. (1933). Anatomische Untersuchungen eines Falles von Dysostosis cleidocranialis. Virchows Arch. Path. Anat., 231: 540.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Lasker, G. W. (1946). The inheritance of cleidocranial dysostosis. Hum. Biol., 18: 103.Google ScholarPubMed
Liebenam, L. (1939). Zwillingspathologische Untersuchungen aus dem Gebiet der Anomalien der Körperform. Z. Menschl. Vererb. Konstit. Lehre, 22: 373.Google Scholar
Rubin, P. (1964). Dynamic Classification of Bone Dysplasias. Year Book Medical Publishers, Chicago.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
Schulze, Chr. (1964). Anomalien, Mißbildungen und Krankheiten der Zähne, des Mundes und der Kiefer. In: Humangenetik, hrsg. von P. E. Becker, II, Thieme, Stuttgart.Google Scholar
Verschuer, O. v. (1959). Genetik des Menschen. Urban & Schwarzenberg, Berlin/München.Google Scholar
Witkop-Oostenrijk, G. A. (1957). Contribution to the study of the inheritance of dysostosis cleidocranialis. Acta Genet., 7: 223.Google Scholar