Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:22:56.819Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Case of Successful Twin Pregnancy Placed in Separate Horns of Bicornuate, Unicollis Uterus

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

A. W. Kuczynski ,
W. Szcześniak  and
A. Szczygielski
A. W. Kuczynski*
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital in Drezdenko
W. Szcześniak
Affiliation:
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital in Drezdenko
A. Szczygielski
Affiliation:
Institute of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Pomeranian Medical Academy, Szczecin, Poland
*
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Regional Hospital in Drezdenko, U1. Marszałkowska 3, 66-530 Drezdenko, Poland

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

We described a case of pregnancy, delivery and peurperium of 28 years old multipara with twins pregnancy in bicornuate, unicollis uterus. Each fetus was placed in separate horn of uterus. Biological mature pregnancy was delivered by cesarean section. During the peurperium the involution disturbances of one of the uterus horns were observed. The case was discussed in context of other similar anomalies.

Keywords

Bicornuate (uterus)Cesarean sectionInfertilityPregnancyTwinsUterus (abnormalities)
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 47 , Issue 3-4 , October 1998 , pp. 201 - 204
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1998

References

REFERENCES

1. Arredondo-Soberon, F et al. (1997): Uterine arteriovenous malformation in a patient with recurrent pregnancy loss and a bicornuate uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med 42 (4): 239–43.Google Scholar
2. Barmet, LJ et al. (1996): Twin gestation occupying separate horns of a bicornuate uterus after in-vitro fertilization and embryo-transfer. Hum Reprod 11 (10): 2316–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
3. Check, JH et al. (1992): Successful delivery of twins in a woman with a unicornuate uterus. Gynecol Obstet Invest 34 (2): 124–5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4. Chang, WF et al. (1994): Ultrasound diagnosis of rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy in fourteen weeks of gestation: a case report. Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol 20 (3): 279–82.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
5. Colacurci, N et al. (1996): Reproductive outcome after hysteroscopic metroplasty. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol 66 (2): 147–50.Google Scholar
6. Gerbie, MV (1980): General gynecological problems in pregnancy. Obstetrical practice. Aldajem, Sylvio (Ed, the CV Mosby Company, St Luis – Toronto-London) 715–725.Google Scholar
7. Ginsberg, NA et al (1997): Management of a triplet gestation complicated by uterus didelphys. Fetal Diagn Ther 12 (1): 59–60.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
8. Heinonen, PK (1997): Reproductive performance of woman with uterine anomalies after abdominal or hysteroscopic metroplasty or no surgical treatment. J Am Assoc Gynecol Laparosc 4 (3): 311–7.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
9. Homsi, RI et al. (1994): Uterus didelphys and unilateral lower limb amelia in a discordant monozygotic twin. A case report. J Reprod Med 39 (6): 481–4.Google Scholar
10. Maneschi, F et al. (1995): Hysteroscopically detected asymptomatic Müllerian anomalies. Prevalence and reproductive implications. J Reprod Med 40 (10): 684–8.Google Scholar
11. Martinez-Frias, et al. (1998): Congenital anomalies in the offspring of mothers with a bicornuate uterus. Pediatrics 101 (4): E10.Google Scholar
12. Nahra-Lynch, M et al. (1997): Multiple gestation in a unicornuate uterus. A case report. J Reprod Med. 42 (7): 451–4.Google Scholar
13. Nahum, GG (1997): Rudimentary uterine horn pregnancy. A case report on surviving twins delivered eight days apart. J Reprod Med 42 (8): 525–32.Google Scholar
14. Pelosi, MA (1996): Laparoscopic-assisted transvaginal metroplasty for the treatment of bicornuate uterus: A case study. Fertil Steril 65 (4): 886–90.Google Scholar
15. Raga, F et al. (1997): Reproductive impact of congenital Müllerian anomalies. Human Reprod 12 (10): 2277–81.Google Scholar