Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-4rdpn Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-04T18:52:07.220Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Agénésie Sacrococcygienne et Syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich Étude Génétique et Chromosomique

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

I. Emerit ,
J. de Grouchy ,
P. Corone ,
P. Vernant  and
M. Laval-Jeantet
I. Emerit
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie (Professeur P. Soulié), Hôpital Broussais et Clinique de Génétique Médicale (Professeur Maurice Lamy), Hôpital des Enfants-Malades et Service Central de Radiologie de l'Hôpital Broussais-Paris, (France)
J. de Grouchy
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie (Professeur P. Soulié), Hôpital Broussais et Clinique de Génétique Médicale (Professeur Maurice Lamy), Hôpital des Enfants-Malades et Service Central de Radiologie de l'Hôpital Broussais-Paris, (France)
P. Corone
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie (Professeur P. Soulié), Hôpital Broussais et Clinique de Génétique Médicale (Professeur Maurice Lamy), Hôpital des Enfants-Malades et Service Central de Radiologie de l'Hôpital Broussais-Paris, (France)
P. Vernant
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie (Professeur P. Soulié), Hôpital Broussais et Clinique de Génétique Médicale (Professeur Maurice Lamy), Hôpital des Enfants-Malades et Service Central de Radiologie de l'Hôpital Broussais-Paris, (France)
M. Laval-Jeantet
Affiliation:
Chaire de Cardiologie (Professeur P. Soulié), Hôpital Broussais et Clinique de Génétique Médicale (Professeur Maurice Lamy), Hôpital des Enfants-Malades et Service Central de Radiologie de l'Hôpital Broussais-Paris, (France)

Summary

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

A child, aged 11, with female phenotype, associating a sacrococcygeal agenesis to Bonnevie-Ullrich's syndrome, without gonadal dysgenesis, is described. The patient's caryotype is a normal female one (44 A, XX). No similar cases could be found in the literature.

This association of two syndromes of undetermined origin is probably fortuitous. A genetic study of 65 pedigrees from the literature did not reveal a mendelian type of inheritance. The possibility of external factors having occurred during embryonic life is discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 13 , Issue 1 , January 1964 , pp. 69 - 89
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1964

References

Bibliographie

1. Achard, Ch., Foix, Ch. et Mouzon, J.: Syndromes de réduction numérique des vertèbres sacrococcygiennes. Revue neurologique, 1924, 1: 270.Google Scholar
2. Addison, J.: Sacrococcygeal agenesis. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med., 1955, 48: 163.Google Scholar
3. Albrecht, : Über kongenitalen Defekt der 3 letzten Sacral- und sämtlicher Steisswirbel. Deutsche med. Wschr., 1885, 11: 413.Google Scholar
4. Albeaux-Fernet, M. et Deribereux, J.: Les dysgénésies ovariennes. Sem. Hôp. Paris, 1955, 31: 3135.Google Scholar
5. Baldwin, W. M.: The action of ultra-violet rays upon the frog's egg. Artificial production of spina bifida. Anat. Rec., 1915, 9: 365.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
6. Ben Youssef, N.: Étude du syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich. Thèse, Paris 1961, n° 816.Google Scholar
7. Berman, W.: Congenital absence of the sacrum and coccyx complicating pregnancy. Am. J. Obstr. Gyn., 1945, 50: 447.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
8. Bieber, G.: Sindrome di Bonnevie-Ullrich associata a cardiopatia congenita. Rivista de Clinica pediatrica, 1960, 65: 148.Google Scholar
9. Bloom, C. J., Stone, R. E. et Henriques, A.: Three unusual cases of congenital origin. Arch. Pediatr., 1917, 34: 512.Google Scholar
10. Blumel, J., Evans, E. A. et Eggers, G. W. N.: Sacrococcygeal agenesis. J. Bone and Joint. Surg, 1959, 41: 497.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
11. Brack, E.: Über das Kreuzbein. Virchow's Archiv f. Path. Anat., 1929, 272: 295.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
12. Brailsford, J. F.: Deformity of the lumbo-sacral region of the spine. British Surgery, 1929, 16: 568.Google Scholar
13. Bradburn, W. R.: Interesting case of infected bladder and kidneys due to malformation of sacrum. New Orleans med. and surg. Journal, 1922, 74: 633.Google Scholar
14. Caflisch, A.: Le pterygium. Thèse, Zürich 1952.Google Scholar
15. Charlier, A. et Santy, P.: Spina bifida géant. Revue d'orthop. 1913, 4: 257.Google Scholar
16. Christiaens, L., Laude, M. et Fontaine, G.: Du status de Bonnevie-Ullrich au syndrome de Turner-Albright. Annales de Pédiatrie 1961, 37: 1681.Google Scholar
17. Danforth, C. H.: Artificial and hereditary suppression of sacral vertebrae in the fowl. Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol., 1932, 30: 143.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18. Decourt, J., Michard, J. P. et Delzant, E.: Syndrome de Turner avec caryotype féminin normal. Rev. fr. End. Clin. 1960, 1/4: 321.Google Scholar
19. Del Duca, V., Davis, E. V. et Barrowony, J. N.: Congenital absence of the sacrum. J. Bone and Joint Surg. l95l, 33A: 248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
20. Desfosses, P. et Mouchet, A.: Absence du sacrum et des deux dernières vertèbres lombaires. Rev. d'Orthop., 1924, 11: 61.Google Scholar
21. Doborovolskaia-Zavadskaia, : Terminaison suspelvienne de la colonne vertébrale chez les souris adultes sans queue. C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 1932, 109: 346 et C. R. Soc. Biol. Paris, 1932, 109: 420.Google Scholar
22. Drehmann, : Über angeborene Wirkeldefekte. Brun's Beiträge, 1927, 139.Google Scholar
23. Duhamel, B.: Malformations anorectales et anomalies vertébrales. Arch. fr. Péd., 1959, 16: 534.Google Scholar
24. Dunn, L. C. et coll.: A new mutation in the mouse affecting spinal column and urogenital system. J. Hered., 1940, 31: 343.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
25. Dunn, L. G. et Glucksoiin-Schonheimer, S.: A new complexe of hereditary abnormalities in the house mouse. J. exp. Zool., 1947, 104: 25.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
26. Duraiswami, P. K.: Insulin-induced skeletal abnormalities in developing chicken. Brit. Med. J., 1950, 2: 384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
27. Edwards, J. H., Harnden, D. G., Cameron, A. H., Crosse, V. M. et Wolff, O. H.: A new trisomie syndrome. Lancet, 1960, 1: 787.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
28. Elmslie, H. C.: Case of congenital absence of sacrum. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1921, 15: 8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
29. Feller, A. et Sternberg, H.: Zur Kenntnis der Fehlbildungen der Wirbelsäule. Ztschr. f. Anat. und Entw. Geschichte, 1938, 108: 283.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30. Ferrier, P., Shepard, T. H., Garther, S. et Burt, B.: Chromatin-positive gonadal dysgenesis and mosaicism. Lancet, 1961, 2: 1170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
31. Fitch, R. R.: Congenital absence of vertebrae below the first sacral and malformation of the lower cervical and upper dorsal vertebrae. Am. J. Orthop. Surg., 1909, 7: 540.Google Scholar
32. Foix, Ch. et Hillemand, P.: Dystrophie cruro-vesico-fessière par agénésie sacro-coccygienne. Revue neural., 1924, 40: 450.Google Scholar
33. Ford, C. E., Jones, K. W., Polani, P. E., Almeida, J. C. de, Briggs, J. H.: A sex chromosomal anomaly in a case of gonadal dysgenesis. Lancet, 1959, 1: 711.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
34. Ford, F. R.: Diseases of the nervous system in infancy and childhood. Charles C. Thomas Publisher, Springfield U.S.A. 1946.Google Scholar
35. Fraccaro, M., Ikkos, D., Lindsten, J., Luft, R. et Kaijser, K.: A new type of chromosomal abnormality in gonadal dysgenesis. Lancet, 1960, 39: 1144.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
36. Freedman, B.: Congenital absence of the sacrum and coccyx. Brit. J. Surg. 1950, 57: 299.Google Scholar
37. Friedl, G.: Defekt der Wirbelsäule vom 10. BW abwärts bei einem Neugeborenen. Archiv Klin. Chir. 1910, 93: 944.Google Scholar
38. Froehlich, M.: Absence congénitale d'une moitié du sacrum. Rev. méd. de l'Est Nancy 1905, 37: 308.Google Scholar
39. Girard, P. M.: Congenital absence of the sacrum. J. Bone and Joint Surg. 1935, 17: 1062.Google Scholar
40. Giroud, A., Tuchmann-Duplessis, H.: Malformations congénitales. Rôle des facteurs exogènes. Pathol. Biologie 1962, 10: 119.Google Scholar
41. Glucksohn-Schonheimer, S. et Dunn, L. C.: A hereditary syndrome of abnormalities of spine, urogenital system and intestine in mice. Anat. Rec. 1942, 84: 484.Google Scholar
42. Glucksohn-Schonheimer, S. et Dunn, L. C.: Sirens, aprosopi and intestinal abnormalities in the house-mouse. Anat. Rec., 1945, 92: 201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
43. Grassin, R.: Contribution à l'étude des agénésies sacro-coccygiennes. Thèse, Paris 1962 n° 834.Google Scholar
44. Grossman, E.: Pituitary gonadotropins in gonadal dysgenesis. Pediatrics, 1960, 25: 298.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
45. Grouchy, J. de, Lamy, M., Frezal, J., et Ribier, J.: XX/XO mosaics in Turner's syndrome. Lancet 1961, 1: 1369.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
46. Grouchy, J. de, Josso, N., Gennes, J. L. de, Hennequet, F., Ribier, J., Frezal, J. et Lamy, M.: Mosaïques intéressant le chromosome X dans le syndrome de Turner. Annales de Péd. 04 1963.Google Scholar
47. Grouchy, J. de, Lamy, M. et Roubin, M.: Étude du caryotype à partir d'une culture de leucocytes. Annales de Péd., 1963, 23: 800.Google Scholar
48. Gruneberg, H.: The genetics of the mouse. Martinus Nijhoff éditeurs, Den Haag 1952.Google Scholar
49. Guilleminet, M.: Agénésie subtotale du sacrum et du coccyx. Lyon Chir., 1938 35: 369.Google Scholar
50. Haddad, H. M. et Wilkins, L.: Congenital anomalies associated with gonadal aplasia. Pediatrics, 1959, 23: 885.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
51. Hamerton, J. L.: Chromosomes in medicine. The National Spastic Society-Medical Education and Information Unit. In association with William Heinemann Medical Books Ltd. London.Google Scholar
52. Hamsa, W. R.: Congenital absence of the sacrum. Arch. Surg., 1935, 30: 657.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
53. Harnden, D. G., Stewart, J. S.: The chromosomes in a case of pure gonadal dysgenesis. Brit. Med. J. 1959: 1288.Google Scholar
54. Higgs, S. L.: Specimen of congenital absence of the sacrum. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1924, 17: 39.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
55. Hilgenreiner, H.: Ein Fall von Anchypodie. Beitrag zum vollständigen Kreuzbeindefekt. Zeitschr. Orthop., 1937, 66: 224.Google Scholar
56. Hohl, A. P.: Zur Pathologie des Beckens. Wilhelm-Engelmann-Verlag, Leipzig 1852.Google Scholar
57. Jacobs, P. A. et Keay, A. J.: Somatic chromosomes in a child with Bonnevie-Ullrich syndrome. Lancet 1959, 2: 723.Google Scholar
58. Jacobs, P. A., Harnden, D. G., Buckton, K. A., Court Brown, W. M., King, M., McBride, J. A., Mc Gregor, T. N. et Maclean, N.: Cytogenetic studies in primary amenorrhea. Lancet, 1961, 1: 1183.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
59. Josso, N., Grouchy, J. de, Frezal, J. et Lamy, M.: Le syndrome de Turner familial. Annales de Pédiatrie, 1963, 23: 775.Google Scholar
60. Katz, J. F.: Congenital absence of the sacrum and coccyx. J. Bone andjoint Surg. 1953, 35A: 398.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
61. Keay, A. J. et Lewis, I. C.: The Bonnevie-Ullrich syndrome. Arch. Dis. Childhood 1954, 29: 424.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
62. Kratochvil, L. et Zderkovic, A.: Kasuistischer Beitrag zur Myelodysplasie mit sacrococcygealer Agenesie. Zentralblatt f. Chir. 1956, 81: 2346.Google Scholar
63. Lamy, M., Frezal, J. et Thiriez, H.: Le syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich et ses rapports avec le syndrome de Turner. In Gedda, L.: Genetica délia Tubercolosi e dei Tumori, Analecta Genetica, Roma 1958.Google Scholar
64. Lamy, M., Grouchy, J. de et Schweisguth, O.: Genetic and nongenetic factors in the etiology of congenital heart disease. Am. J. Hum. Genetics 1957, 9: N. 1.Google ScholarPubMed
65. Landauer, W.: Rumplessness of chicken embryos produced by the injection of insuline and other chemicals. J. Exp. Zool. 1945, 98: 65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
66. Lehmann, F. E.: Die Entwicklung von Ruckenmark, Spinalganglien und Wirbelanlagen in chordalosen Korperregionen von Tretowlarven. Rev. Suisse Zool. 1935, 42: 405.Google Scholar
67. Leri, A. et Linossier, A.: Absence du sacrum. Bull, et mem. soc. méd. hôp. Paris 1925, 49: 12.Google Scholar
68. Liarakos, S.: Manifestations cardiaques au cours du syndrome de Turner. Thèse, Paris 1959.Google Scholar
69. Lichter, A.: Sacral agenesis. Report of a case. Arch. Surg., 1947, 54: 430.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
70. Lipschutz, A.: Les rapports du syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich avec le syndrome de Turner. Thèse, Paris. 1959.Google Scholar
71. Litzmann, : Ein durch mangelhafte Entwicklung des Kreuzbeins querverengtes Becken. Arch. f. Gyn. 1855, 25: 31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
72. Lust, M.: Trois cas de syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich. Sem. Hôp. Paris 1956, 32: 3573.Google ScholarPubMed
73. Mally, : Syndrome de Little chez un enfant présentant une absence congénitale du sacrum et du coccyx. Bull. Soc. anat., mars 1903.Google Scholar
74. Michard, J. P.: Le syndrome de Turner. Rev. Patricien, 1958, 8: 2163.Google Scholar
75. Muller, J. H.: Ein Fall von Aplasie des Sacrum. Rontgenpraxis, 1936, 8: 105.Google Scholar
76. Paez-Rios, J.: Agenesia sacro-coxigea subtotal. Minerva urologica, 1952, 8: 4.Google Scholar
77. Paris, J. et Christiaens, L.: Megarectum par sténose congénitale de l'anus associée à une agénésie partielle du sacrum. Pédiatrie, Lyon 1957, 12: 458.Google ScholarPubMed
78. Perrault, M., Klotz, B. et Housset, E.: Deux cas de syndrome de Turner avec surdi-mutité dans une même fratrie. Bull, et mém. Soc. Méd. Hôp. Paris 1951, 67: 79.Google Scholar
79. Pirkey, E. et Purcell, J.: Agenesis of lumbosacral vertebrae. Radiology 1957, 69: 727.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
80. Polani, P. E., Hunter, W. F. et Lennox, B.: Chromosomal sex in Turner's syndrome with coarctation of the aorta. Lancet 1954, 2: 120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
81. Polani, P. E., Hunter, W. F. et Lennox, B.: Turner's syndrome and allied conditions. Clinical features and chromosome abnormalities. Brit. med. Bull., 1961, 17: 200.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
82. Polani, P. E., Hunter, W. F. et Lennox, B.: in Hamerton, Chromosomes in Medicine. Medical Books Ltd. London.Google Scholar
83. Pouzet, F.: Les anomalies du développement du sacrum. Lyon Chir., 1938, 35: 371.Google Scholar
84. Rendu, A. et Verrier, H.: Absence partielle du sacrum avec malformations multiples. Rev. orthop., 1913, 4: 311.Google Scholar
85. Rossi, E. et Caflisch, A.: Le syndrome du pterygium. Helv. paed, acta, 1951, 6: 119.Google ScholarPubMed
86. Silver, H. K. et Kempe, C. H.: Ovarian agenesis in children. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1953, 85: 523.Google ScholarPubMed
87. Silver, H. K. et Dodd, S. G.: Gonadal dysgenesis. Bonnevie-Ullrich-Turner syndrome with elevated gonadotropins in a nine year old child. Am. J. Dis. Child. 1957, 94: 207.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
88. Sinclair, J. G. et coll.: Congenital lumbosacral defect. Arch. Surg. 1941, 43: 473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
89. Soothill, J. F.: Congenital absence of the sacrum and coccyx. Guy's Hosp. Rep. 1954, 103: 87.Google ScholarPubMed
90. Stewart, J. S. S.: Gonadal dysgenesis: the genetic significance of unusual variants. Acta End. 1960, 33: 89.Google ScholarPubMed
91. Storm-Mathison, A.: Myelodysplasia with absence of the sacrum. Acta psych, neurol. Scand. 1954, 103: 145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
92. Touraine, A.: L'hérédité en médecine. Éd. Masson et Cie 1955 p. 667.Google Scholar
93. Turner, H. H.: A syndrome of infantilism, congenital webbed neck and cubitus valgus. Endrocrinology 1938, 23: 566.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
94. Ullrich, O.: Über typische Kombinationsbilder multipler Abartungen. Z. Kinderheilkunde 1930, 49: 271.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
95. Valegeas, A.: Malformation congénitale due à une agénésie de la colonne vertébrale. Mémoire C.E.S. Électro-Radiologie, Paris 1955.Google Scholar
96. Verger, P., Guignard, J. et Oyhenart, J.: Trois observations de syndrome de Turner-Albright. Arch. Ped. 1959, 16: 484.Google Scholar
97. Vinson, B.: Le syndrome de Bonnevie-Ullrich. Thèse, Paris 1952, n° 562.Google Scholar
98. Wertheim, O. C.: Fehlen von Kreuz-und Steissbein bei einem Neugeborenen. Mschr. Geburtshilfe u. Frauenkr. 1857, 9: 127.Google Scholar
99. White, C.: A fetus with congenital absence of the sacrum. Proc. Roy. Soc. Med. 1911, 4: 279.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
100. Zeligs, M.: Congenital absence of the sacrum. Arch. Surg. 1940, 41: 1220.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
101. Zilva, S. S., Golding, J., Drummond, J. C. et Coward, K. H.: The relation of the fat-soluble factor to rickets and growth in pigs. Biochem. J. 1921, 15: 427.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed