Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-q99xh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-25T02:38:20.130Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Accommodating a Twin Pregnancy: Maternal Processes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

J. E. Van der Zalm
J. E. Van der Zalm*
Affiliation:
Faculty of Nursing, University of Alberta Edmonton, Alberta, Canada
*
RN, MN, Faculty of Nursing, Clinical Sciences Building, 3rd Floor, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, CanadaT6G 2G3

Abstract

Core share and HTML view are not available for this content. However, as you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.

The object of this study was to develop a theory of the relationship between a mother and her unborn twins using a qualitative grounded theory methodology. Ten women participated in interviews during the last trimester of a twin pregnancy and again during the early postpartum period. Data provided by these women was analysed using the constant comparative method. Two additional informants were sampled in order to formulate and verify the tentative theory. For women in this study, the findings indicate that mothers form a relationship with their unborn twins within the wider context of accommodating the twin pregnancy in their lives. A woman accomplishes this process by immediately seeking information about twin pregnancy, by making room, in all senses, for two babies instead of one in her life, and by appraising her own pregnancy risk. A mother engages in self-protective behaviors and in behaviors designed to protect the health of her unborn twins as a method of coping with the perceived risk of the twin pregnancy and with the twin pregnancy itself. As the twin pregnancy progresses, women move toward accepting the idea of being pregnant with twins. For women pregnant with twins, the birth of two infants confirms the reality of the pregnancy.

Keywords

TwinsPregnancyMaternal processesMaternal-fetal relationship
Type
Research Article
Information
Acta geneticae medicae et gemellologiae: twin research , Volume 44 , Issue 2 , April 1995 , pp. 117 - 133
Copyright
Copyright © The International Society for Twin Studies 1995

References

REFERENCES

1.Anderson, A, Anderson, B (1990): Toward a substantive theory of mother-twin attachment. MCN 15: 373:377.Google Scholar
2.Bergum, V (1989): Woman to Mother: A Transformation. Granby, MA: Bergin & Harvey.Google Scholar
3.Campbell, IE, Field, PA (1989): Common psychological concerns experienced by parents during pregnancy Can Ment Health 37:2–5.Google Scholar
4.Coleman, AD, Coleman, LL (1971): Pregnancy: The Psychological Experience. New York: Herder & Herder.Google Scholar
5.Corbin, JM (1987): Women's perceptions and management of a pregnancy complicated by chronic illness Health Care Women Int 8:317–337.Google Scholar
6.Cranley, MS (1981): Development of a tool for the measurement of maternal attachment during pregnancy Nurs Res 30:281–284.Google Scholar
7.Field, PA, Marek, PB (1994): Uncertain Motherhood: Negotiating the Risks of the Childbearing Years. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage.Google Scholar
8.Frazer, EB (1977): The work of a multigravida in becoming the mother of twins Matern Child Nurs J 6:87–105.Google Scholar
9.Glaser, B, Strauss, A (1967): The Discovery of Grounded Theory: Strategies for Qualitative Research. New York: De Gruyter.Google Scholar
10.Grace, JT (1989): Development of maternal-fetal attachment during pregnancy Nurs Res 38: 228–232.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
11.Gromada, K (1981): Maternal-infants attachment: the first step toward individualizing twins Matern Child Nurs J 6:129–134.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
12.Harris, R (1994): The process of infertility. In Field, PA, Marek, PB (eds): Uncertain Motherhood: Negotiating the Risks of the Childbearing Years. Thousand Oaks CA: Sage, pp 15–81.Google Scholar
13.Heidrich, SM, Cranley, MS (1989): Effect of fetal movement, ultrasound scans, and amniocentesis on maternal-fetal attachment. Nurs Res 38:81–84.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
14.Lederman, RP (1984): Psychosocial Adaptation in Pregnancy. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
15.Leifer, M (1977): Psychological changes accompanying pregnancy and motherhood Genet Psychol Monogr 95:57–96.Google ScholarPubMed
16.Leonard, LG (1981): Postpartum depression and mothers of infant twins Matern Child Nurs J 10: 99–109.Google Scholar
17.Lerum, CW, LoBiondo-Wood, G (1989): The relationship of maternal age, quickening, and physical symptoms of pregnancy to the development of maternal-fetal attachment Birth 16: 13–17.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
18.Lever-Hense, EA (1994): Livebirth following stillbirth. In Field, PA, Marek, PB (eds): Uncertain Motherhood: Neogotiating the Risks of the Childbearing Years. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 163–194.Google Scholar
19.Lumley, J (1980): The image of the fetus in the first trimester Birth Fam J 7: 5–14.Google Scholar
20.Lumley, J (1982): Attitudes to the fetus among Primigravidae Aust Paediatr J 18: 106–109.Google Scholar
21.Malmstrom, PEM, Malmstrom, EJ (1988): Maternal recognition of twin pregnancy Acta Genet Med Gemellol 37: 187–192.Google Scholar
22.McGeary, K (1994): The influence of guarding on the developing mother-unborn child relationship. In Field, PA, Marek, PB (eds): Uncertain Motherhood: Negotiating the Risks of the Childbearing Years. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage, pp 139–162.Google Scholar
23.Miller, W, Wahera, S, Nimrod, C (1992): Multiple births: trends and patterns in Canada, 1974-1990 Health Rep 4: 223–250.Google Scholar
24.Mishel, MH (1988): Uncertainty in illness Image J Nurs Sch 20: 225–232.Google Scholar
25.Mishel, MH (1988): Finding meaning: antecedents of uncertainty in illness Nurs Res 37: 98–103.Google Scholar
26.Mishel, MH (1990): Reconceptualization of the uncertainty in illness theory Image J Nurs Sch 22: 256–262.Google Scholar
27.Muller, M (1992): A critical review of prenatal attachment research Sch Inq Nurs Prac 6: 5–22.Google ScholarPubMed
28.Penticuff, JH (1982): Psychological implications in high-risk pregnancy Nurs Clin North Am 17:69–78.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
29.Raphael-Leff, J (1982): Psychotherapeutic needs of mothers-to-be J Child Psychotherapy 8: 3–13.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
30.Raphael-Leff, J (1991): Psychological Processes of Childbearing. London: Chapman & Hall.Google Scholar
31.Reading, AE, Cox, DN, Sledmere, CM, Campbell, S (1984): Psychological changes over the course of pregnancy: a study of attitudes toward the fetus/neonate Health Psychol 3: 211–221.Google Scholar
32.Rubin, R (1970): Cognitive style in pregnancy Am J Nurs 70: 502–508.Google ScholarPubMed
33.Rubin, R (1975): Maternal tasks in pregnancy Matern Child Nurs J 4: 143–153.Google ScholarPubMed
34.Rubin, R (1977): Binding-in in the postpartum period Matern Child Nurs J 6: 67–75.Google ScholarPubMed
35.Rubin, R (1984): Maternal identity and the maternal experience. New York: Springer.Google Scholar
36.Snyder, DJ (1979): The high-risk mother viewed in relation to a holistic model of the childbearing experience JOGNN 8: 164–170.Google Scholar
37.Stainton, MC (1985): The fetus: a growing member of the family Fam Relat 34: 321–326.Google Scholar
38.Stainton, MC (1990): Parents' awareness of their unborn infant in the third trimester Birth 17: 92–96.Google Scholar
39.Strauss, A, Corbin, J (1990): Basics of qualitative research. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
40.Theroux, R (1989): Multiple birth: a unique parenting experience J Perinat Neonat Nurs 3: 35–45.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed
41.Tilden, V (1980): A developmental conceptual framework for the maturational crisis of pregnancy West J Nurs Res 2: 667–679.Google Scholar
42.Trad, PV (1991): Adaptation to developmental transformations during the various phases of motherhood J Am Acad Psychoanal 19: 403–421.Google Scholar
43.Valentine, D (1982): The experience of pregnancy: a developmental process Fam Relat 31: 243–248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar