Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T13:35:05.657Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Medicalization of Nordestinos: Public Health and Regional Identity in Northeastern Brazil, 1889-1930*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  11 December 2015

Stanley S. Blake*
Affiliation:
The University of Chicago, Chicago, Illinois

Extract

In his 1927 annual report to the Pernambucan state legislature, Governor Estacio de Albuquerque Coimbra wrote that “the economic, intellectual, moral and civic value of the Nation and the State is shaped, with the expression of human activity, in the excellence of physical and moral robustness of its population.” He believed that government was responsible for improving the condition of its citizens, and that “man, healthy or sick, … ought to fall under the knowing gaze of the Governments, preserving or restoring him to health, to benefit the Nation.” Under Coimbra's administrations, the Pernambucan government inaugurated public health, public assistance, and education programs designed to improve the material and physical well-being of Pernambucan citizens. This was not an easy task; regional economic underdevelopment and perennial budget crises threatened government-sponsored social programs. While public health programs could be implemented and administered with relative ease in the state's capital of Recife, transportation problems and low population density made the extension of such services to the residents of the state's interior almost impossible. Despite these obstacles, public health programs and the physical well-being of the state's populations had become the single most important concern of the Pernambucan government by the mid 1920s, and the expectation of future economic development and social progress was tied to the development of effective public health programs.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © Academy of American Franciscan History 2003

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

An earlier version of this essay was presented at the Latin American Studies Association meeting held in Miami in March 2000. I would like to thank David Sowell, Heather McCrea, Daisy Delogu and the anonymous TAM reviewer for their suggestions and comments.

References

1 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem apresentada ao Congresso Legislativo na abertura da 4.a sessão da 12.a legislatura pelo Governador do Estado Dr. Estado de Albuquerque Coimbra, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 8, Arquivo Público Estadual Jordâo Emerenciano, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil (hereafter APEJE), pp. 2324.Google Scholar

2 See Skidmore, , Black into White: Race and Nationality in Brazilian Thought (Durham: Duke University Press, 1993), pp. 174–75;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and de Castro-Santos, Luis A.Power, Ideology, and Public Health in Brazil, 1889–1930” (Ph.D. diss., Harvard Univ., 1986), pp. 121–31.Google Scholar

3 See Williams, Steven C.Nationalism and Public Health: The Convergence of Rockefeller Foundation Technique and Brazilian Federal Authority during the Time of Yellow Fever, 1925–1930,” in Cueto, Marcos ed. Missionaries of Science: The Rockefeller Foundation and Latin America (Bloomington: Indiana University Press, 1994), pp. 2351.Google Scholar

4 In the 1910s and 1920s, these positive assessments of nordestinos’ moral and racial qualities derived in, in large part, from da Cunha's, Euclydes Os sertões, 38th ed. (Rio de Janeiro: Francisco Alves, 1997).Google Scholar The faculty of the Recife Law School problematized rather than embraced Brazilians’ mixed racial heritage, as Schwarcz, Lilia Moritz argues in O espetáculo das raças: dentistas, institutiçôes e questâo racial no Brasil—1870–1930 (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1993), pp. 143–72.Google Scholar

5 Studies of public health in Brazil that make comparisons between less developed regional public health services and more “advanced” national and foreign organizations include Castro-Santos, “Power”; and Stepan, Nancy, Beginnings of Brazilian Science: Oswaldo Cruz Medical Research and Policy, 1890–1920 (New York: Science History Publications, 1976).Google Scholar

6 General histories of Brazilian public health in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries include Chalhoub, Sidney, Cidade febril: cortiços e epidemias na Corte imperial (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1996);Google Scholar Hochman, Gilberto, A era do saneamento: As bases da política de saúde pública no Brasil (São Paulo: Editora Hucitec, 1998);Google Scholar Luz, Madel T., Medicina e ordem política brasileira: políticas e institutições de saúde (1850–1930) (Rio de Janeiro: Edições Graal, 1982);Google Scholar and Merhy, Emerson Elias, A saúde pública como política: um estudo de formuladores de políticas (São Paulo, Editora Hucitec, 1992).Google Scholar

7 On public health in northeastern Brazil see Castro-Santos, , “Power”; Peard, Julyan G., Race, Place, and Medicine: The Idea of the Tropics in Nineteenth-Century Brazilian Medicine (Durham: Duke University Press, 1999);Google Scholar Peard, Julyan G., “Tropical Disorders and the Forging of a Brazilian Medical Identity, 1860–1890,” Hispanic American Historical Review 77:1 (Feb. 1997), pp. 144;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Costa, Veloso, Medicina, Pernambuco e tempo (Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, 1978).Google Scholar

8 On differing regional and national understandings of tropical medicine, see Anderson, Warwick, “Where Is the Postcolonial History of Medicine,” Bulletin of the History of Medicine 72:3 (1998), pp. 522–30.CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed

9 See Stepan, Beginnings; Peard, Race, Place, and Medicine; and Schwarcz, O espetáculo, on Brazilian medical research of the late-nineteenth and early twentieth centuries.

10 On concerns about the redundancy of federal, state, and municipal public health services, see de Pernambuco, Estado Publica, Hygiene Relatorio apresentado á S. Exc. o Sr. Governador do Estado Conselheiro Joaquim Correla de Araujo pelo Dr. Rodolpho Galvão inspector Geral de Hygiene de Pernambuco (Recife: Typographia de Manoel Figueiroa de Faria e Filhos, 1898),Google Scholar Relatórios Diversos, 18561910, APEJE, p. 4.

11 See de Freitas, José Octavio, O clima e a mortalidade da cidade do Recife (Recife: Imprensa Industrial, 1905);Google Scholar and Béringer, Emilio, Estudos sobre o clima e a mortalidade da capital de Pernambuco (Brazil) (Pernambuco: Typographia Commercial, 1891).Google Scholar

12 de Pernambuco, Estado, Hygiene Publica, Relatorio 1898, p. 37.Google Scholar

13 Ibid., p. 3.

14 Ibid., p. 72.

15 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1916, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 2, APEJE, pp. 56.Google Scholar

16 On the connection between climate and disease in the region see Peard, , Race, Place, and Medicine, pp. 81108.Google Scholar

17 de Pernambuco, Estado, Relatório que apresentou ao Exm. Sr. Presidente da Provincia em 27 de Novembro de 1878 o Inspector de Saude Publica Dr. Pedro de Attahyde Lobo Moscoso (Pernambuco: Typographia de Manoel Figueiroa de Faria e Filhos, 1879), Relatónos Diversos, 1856–1910, APEJE, pp. 1011.Google Scholar

18 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1919, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 5, APEJE, pp. 4748.Google Scholar

19 Pernambuco, Estado de, Mensagem 1920, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 5, APEJE, pp. 20.Google Scholar

20 See Ministerio da Industria, Viação e Obras Publicas, Relatorio apresentado ao Vice-Presidente da Republica dos Estados Unidos do Brazil pelo Ministro de Estado dos Negocios da Industria, Viação e Obras Publicas Engenheiro Antonio Francisco de Paula Souza no anno de 1893 5.o da Republica (Rio de Janeiro: Imprensa Nacional, 1893), Ministerio da Industria, Viação e Obras Públicas, Relatónos, cx. 1, APEJE, p. 12; and de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1925, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Men-sagens, cx. 6, APEJE, pp. 7172.Google Scholar

21 Chalhoub, Sidney, “The Politics of Disease Control: Yellow Fever and Race in Nineteenth Century Rio de Janeiro,” Journal of Latin American Studies 25:3 (1993), p. 443.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

22 Estimates of the racial composition of Brazil's population vary considerably, although historians and demographers agree that there was a higher percentage of pardos and pretos in the Northeast than in the South. See Skidmore, , Black, into White, p. 45 Google Scholar and Andrews, George Reid, “Racial Inequality in Brazil and the United States: A Statistical Comparison,” Journal of Social History 26 (Winter 1992), pp. 229–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

23 See, for example, Amorim's, João discussion of mocambos in “Saneamento das habitações da cidade do Recife,” Archivos de Hygiene Publica e Medicina Tropical 1:1 (June 1915),Google Scholar Biblioteca Pública Estadual Castelo Branco, Recife, Pernambuco, Brazil (hereafter BPECB), pp. 49–62. On the connection between ideas of race and medicine see Anderson, Warwick, “Disease, Race, and EmpireBulletin of the History of Medicine 70 (1996), pp. 667;CrossRefGoogle ScholarPubMed Skidmore, , Black into White, pp. 179–85;Google Scholar and Peard, “Tropical Disorders.”

24 See Skidmore, Black into White. George Reid Andrews refutes Florestan Fernandes’ argument that slavery produced an Afro-Brazilian work force that was not up to the rigors of modern economic production. Employers in the Northeast embraced this idea, despite the fact that there was no alternative to native Brazilian workers. See Blacks and Whites in São Paulo, Brazil, 1888–1988 (Madison: University of Wisconsin Press, 1991), pp. 54–89.

25 Only in the 1930s did a Pernambucan public health official undertake an empirical study of the con-nections between race and disease. See Pernambucano, Ulysses, “As doenças mentaes entre os negros de Pernambuco,” in Estudos afro-brasileiros: trabalhos apresentados ao l.o Congresso afro-brasileiro reunido no Recife em 1934, ed. Roquette-Pinto, Edgar (Rio de Janeiro: Ariel Editora, Ltda., 1935), pp. 9398.Google Scholar

26 Deaths from smallpox epidemics averaged 2,000 deaths per year in 1890 and 1896. See de Freitas, José Octavio, Os trabalhos de hygiene em Pernambuco: relatório apresentado ao secretario gérai do Estado (Recife: Officinas Graphicas da Imprensa Official, 1919), p. 83.Google Scholar

27 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1897, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 1, APEJE, p. 42.Google Scholar

28 On the Revolta da Vacina see Meade, Teresa, “‘Civilizing Rio de Janeiro’: The Public Health Campaign and the Riot of 1904,” Journal of Social History (December 1986), pp. 301–22;CrossRefGoogle Scholar de Carvalho, José Murilo, Os bestializados: o Rio de Janeiro e a república que não foi (São Paulo: Companhia das Letras, 1987), pp. 91139;Google Scholar and Sevcenko, Nicolau, A revolta da vacina: mentes insanas em corpos rebeldes (São Paulo: Editora Scipione, 1993).Google Scholar On plans for a mandatory smallpox vaccination campaign see Estado de Pernambuco Mensagem 1904, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 1, APEJE.

29 Freitas, De, Os trabalhos, pp. 83.Google Scholar

30 On disinfection in the U.S. see Tomes, Nancy, The Gospel of Germs: Men, Women, and the Microbe in American Life (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1998);Google Scholar and Kraut, Alan M., Silent Travelers: Germs, Genes, and the “Immigrant Menace” (New York: Basic Books, 1994).Google Scholar

31 de Pernambuco, Estado, Hygiene Publica, Relatorio 1898, p. 22.Google Scholar

32 de Pernambuco, Estado, Relatorio apresentado ao Exm. Sr. Dr. Herculano Bandeira de Mello Governador do Estado pelo Secretario Geral do Estado Bacharel José Osario de Cerqueira em 31 de janeiro de 1910 (Recife: Typographia do Diario de Pernambuco, 1910), Secretario Geral, Relatórios, cx. 1, APEJE, p. 89.Google Scholar

33 In 1917 99 houses were incinerated by the service in six rural municipios. See de Freitas, , Os trabalhos, pp. 2935.Google Scholar

34 Ibid., p. 22.

35 Williams, , “Nationalism,” p. 25.Google Scholar

36 de Pernambuco, Estado, Regulamento para o serviço de hygiene publica do estado de Pernambuco (Recife: Imprensa Industrial, 1905), Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Exposiçào, APEJE, p. 13.Google Scholar

37 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1914, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 4, APEJE, pp. 1112.Google Scholar

38 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1909, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 2, APEJE, p. 5.Google Scholar

39 On the founding of the Faculdade de Medicina do Recife see Kelner, Salomào, et al. Historia da Faculdade de Medicina do Recife 1915–1985 (Recife: Universidade Federal de Pernambuco, Centro de Ciências da Saúde, 1985);Google Scholar and de Freitas, José Otávio, Historia da Faculdade de Medicina do Recife, 1895 a 1943 (Recife: Imprensa Oficial, 1944).Google Scholar

40 Kelner, , História, p. 28.Google Scholar

41 Aitino, EdgarLição de abertura do curso de medicina publica pelo Professor Dr. Edgar Aitino,” Revista Académica da Faculdade de Direito do Recife 26 (1918), pp. 7180,Google Scholar quote p.80.

42 Regional themes became more common in the theses written in late 1920s and 1930s.

43 See Costa, Veloso and de Sá Pessôa, Ida Brandâo, “Periódicos médicos de Pernambuco,” in Kelner, , Historia, pp. 191204,Google Scholar for a listing of medical journals published in Pernambuco.

44 Directoría de Hygiene de Pernambuco, “Editorial,” Archivos de Hygiene Publica e Medicina Tropical 1:1 (June 1915), BPECB, p. 2.

45 Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagem 1917, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 2, APEJE, p. 27.

46 Freitas, De, O clima, p. 52,Google Scholar emphasis in the original; de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1912, Governo de Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 4, APEJE, p. 7.Google Scholar

47 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1914, p. 3.Google Scholar

48 See Castro-Santos, “Power” Skidmore, Black into White; and Lima and Hochman, “Descobrindo a nação.”

49 Neiva, Arthur and Penna, Belisario, “Viagem cientifica pelo norte da Bahia, sudoeste de Pernambuco, sul do Piauhí e de norte a sul de Goiaz,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 8:3 (1916), pp. 74224;CrossRefGoogle Scholar and Lutz, Adolpho and Machado, Astrogildo, “Viagem pelo rio S. Francisco e por alguns dos seus afluentes entre Pirapora e Joazeiro,” Memorias do Instituto Oswaldo Cruz 7:1–2 (1915), pp. 550.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

50 These diseases included “entalação” (literally, to be put in a difficult situation) and “vexame do coraçào” (vexation of the heart). Physicians theorized that these were psychological disorders which resulted from the periodic droughts that affected the region. See Neiva, and Penna, , “Viagem cientifica,” pp. 132–42.Google Scholar

51 Neiva, and Penna, , “Viagem cientifica,” p. 222.Google Scholar

52 Ibid., p. 167.

53 Lutz, and Machado, , “Viagem pelo rio S. Francisco,” pp. 89.Google Scholar

54 Neiva, and Penna, , “Viagem cientifica,” p. 167.Google Scholar

55 Ibid., pp. 172–73.

56 The Oswaldo Cruz Institute physicians believed that sertanejos descended from African slaves while Northeastern politicians and intellectuals argued for Indian and Portuguese descent.

57 Neiva, and Penna, , “Viagem cientifica,” p. 175.Google Scholar

58 Skidmore, , Black into White, pp. 6469.Google Scholar

59 Neiva, and Penna, , “Viagem cientifica,” p. 181.Google Scholar

60 Ibid., p. 221.

61 On Penna's later rejection, of racial determinism, see Penna, Belisario, Saneamento do Brasil: sanear o Brasil é povoal-o; é enriquecel-o; é moralisal-o (Rio de Janeiro: Typographia Revista dos Tribunaes, 1918).Google Scholar

62 Skidmore, , Black into White, p. 183,Google Scholar and Castro-Santos, , “Power,” pp. 126–49.Google Scholar See also Lima, Nísia Trindade and Britto, NaraSalud y nacíon: Propusta para el saneamiento rural: Un estudio de la revista Saúde (1918–1919),” in Salud, cultura y sociedad en América Latina, Cueto, Marcos ed. (Lima: IEP/Organización Panamericana de la Salud, 1996), pp. 147–56.Google Scholar

63 Freitas, De, Os trabalhos, p. 54.Google Scholar

64 Castro-Santos, , “Power,” pp. 58,Google Scholar 61–66.

65 Penna, , Saneamento, pp. 150–51.Google Scholar

66 Historians disagree about the impact of the Rockefeller Foundation on public health programs in Northeastern Brazil. Luiz A. de Castro-Santos argues that the Foundation played an important role in “promoting rural sanitation programs in Brazil,” but concludes that “the contribution of the Rockefeller Foundation—though having an early and direct impart on public health—should not be overestimated.” See Castro-Santos, , “Power,” pp. 135–36.Google Scholar Others place more importance on the Foundation's activities; see Cueto, Missionaries of Science.

67 On nineteenth-century understandings and treatments of ancylostomiasis see Peard, , Race, Place, and Medicine, pp. 6478.Google Scholar

68 Hackett, L.W.Report on Hookworm Infection Survey of the State of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil from November 22, 1916 to March 31, 1917,” Rockefeller Foundation Archives (hereafter RFA), r.g. 5, s. 2, bx. 23, f. 135, Rockefeller Archive Center, Tarrytown, New York (hereafter RAC), p. 31.Google Scholar

69 See Ettling, John, The Germ of Laziness: Rockefeller Philanthropy and Public Health in the New South (Cambridge: Harvard University Press, 1981).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

70 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1918, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, ex. 2, APEJE, p. 19.Google Scholar

71 Ibid., p. 3.

72 See Paes de Azevedo “Medical Inspection of the State of Bahia May 21, 1921,” RFA, r.g. 5, s. 2, bx. 25, f. 150, RAC; and Fred L. Soper “Hookworm Infection Survey of the State of Pernambuco, Brazil May 17th, 1920 to August 31st, 1920,” RFA, r.g. 5, s. 2, bx. 25, f. 150, RAC.

73 Wickliffe Rose “Public Health Situation and Work of the International Health Board in Brazil” RFA, r.g. 5, s. 2, bx. 25, f. 153, RAC, p. 8.

74 Castro-Santos, , “Power,” pp. 146147 Google Scholar; de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1924, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, ex. 5, APEJE, p. 14.Google Scholar

75 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1920, p. 12.Google Scholar

76 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1921, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, ex. 5, APEJE, p. 5;Google Scholar and de Barros, Gouveia, Programma sanitario em Pernambuco (Recife: Imprensa Industrial, 1921), Coleçôes Especiáis, BPECB, p. 20.Google Scholar

77 Pimenta, Joaquim, “Saúde e riqueza (Conferencia que, por motivo de molestia, deixou de pronunciar o autor na sessão inaugural da Sociedade de Medicina e Hygiene Tropical, realizado no dia 2 de julho de 1919),” RAFDR 27 (1919), pp. 4461,Google Scholar quote p. 57.

78 Ibid, p. 60.

79 Rockefeller Foundation officials realized that ancylostomiasis could not be completely eliminated. See Löwy, , “Representação e intervenção em saúde pública: vírus, mosquitos e especialistas da Fundação Rockefeller no Brasil,” Historia, Ciências, Saúde 5:3 (November 1998/February 1999), p. 5.Google Scholar

80 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1924, p. 14.Google Scholar On the Rockefeller Foundation's attempts to eradicate yellow fever in Brazil see Löwy, , “Representação,” pp. 647–77;Google Scholar and Benchimol, Jaime Larry, ed., Febre amarela: a doença e a vacina, urna história inacabada (Rio de Janeiro: Editora Fiocruz, 2001).CrossRefGoogle Scholar

81 Williams, , “Nationalism,” pp. 2425.Google Scholar

82 Connor, M.E., “Summary of Activities of the Commissão de Febre Amarella in Brazil in 1927,” RFA, r.g. 5, s. 3, bx. 114, RAC, p. 11.Google Scholar

83 Crawford, Porter J., “Annual Report 1928 Recife—Pernambuco Station, Yellow Fever Commission of Brazil, The International Health Division, The Rockefeller Commission,” RFA,Google Scholar r.g. 5, s. 3, bx. 100, RAC.

84 “Yellow Fever,” A noite, cited in Burke, Alexander W., “Bahia, Brazil Station Journal, Monthly Statistical Reports 1928,” August 30, 1928,Google Scholar RFA, r.g. 5, s. 3, bx. 128, RAC. Pernambucan public health officials recorded an average of 8.6 deaths per year from yellow fever between 1897 and 1918. See Freitas, de, Os trabalhos, pp. 25,Google Scholar 28–29.

85 Barros, De, Programma sanitario, p. 5.Google Scholar

86 de Medeiros, Amaury, Saude e assistencia: doutrina, experiencias e realisações 1923–1926 (Recife: n.p., [1926]), APEJE, p. 43.Google Scholar

87 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1923, p. 12.Google Scholar

88 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1926, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 6, p. 46.Google Scholar

89 Freitas, De, Os trabalhos, p. 6.Google Scholar

90 See de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1926, p. 48;Google Scholar and Medeiros, De, Saude e assistència, p. 2.Google Scholar

91 Medeiros, De, Saude e assistencia, p. 155.Google Scholar

92 See Stepan, Nancy Leys, “The Hour of Eugenics” : Race, Gender and Nation in Latin America (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1991), p. 126.Google Scholar

93 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1928, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 8, APEJE, p. 35.Google Scholar

94 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1929, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 9, APEJE, p. 36 Google Scholar; de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1930, Governo do Estado de Pernambuco, Mensagens, cx. 10, APEJE, p. 40.Google Scholar

95 Medeiros, De, Saude e assistència, pp. 155–56.Google Scholar

96 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1927, p. 24.Google Scholar

97 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1924, p. 11.Google Scholar

98 Medeiros, De, Saude e assistència, p. 321.Google Scholar

99 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1928, p. 37;Google Scholar and de Andrade, Geraldo, “Anthropometria das classes domesticas de Pernambuco,” Jornal de Medicina de Pernambuco 24:8 (August 1928): pp. 121–33,Google Scholar quote pp. 121–22.

100 de Pernambuco, Estado, Mensagem 1928, p. 37.Google Scholar

101 de Andrade, Geraldo, “Verificaçôes biometricas em Pernambuco,” Jornal de Medicina de Pernambuco 24:9 (September 1928): pp. 151–56,Google Scholar quote p. 155.

102 On the founding of the Institute, see de Pernambuco, Estado, Regulamento do Instituto de Selecção e Orientação Profissional (Recife: Imprensa Official, 1929),Google Scholar Coleção Especial, Anos 1926 a 1930; 1928 a 1929, Relatórios Diversos 1926–1930, APEJE, p. 3.

103 de Pernambuco, Estado, Organização da educação no Estado de Pernambuco (Recife: Inprensa Official, 1929),Google Scholar Coleção Especial, Anos 1925, 1926 a 1927, APEJE, p. 29.

104 Pernambucan reformers followed the lead of industrialists in São Paulo and abroad who sought to modernize their workers through training programs and rationalization of the workplace. See Weinstein, Barbara, For Social Peace in Brazil: Industrialists and the Remaking of the Working Class in São Paulo, 1920–1964 (Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press, 1996).Google Scholar

105 See, for example, de Medeiros, Amaury, “A proposito da peste branca,” Jornal de Medicina de Pernambuco 21:12 (December 1925), pp. 26;Google Scholar and Clementino, Francisco, “A lucta contra a lepra e as doenças venéreas em Pernambuco, Jornal de Medicina de Pernambuco 24:6 (1928), pp. 8798.Google Scholar

106 e Silva, Augusto Lins, “Cinco Chagas,” RAFDR 37 (1929), pp. 335–46.Google Scholar

107 Ibid., pp. 345–46.

108 Alcir Lenharo argues that diseases and the body were used as political metaphors during the Estado Novo (1937–1945) in Sacralização da Política (Campinas: Papirus, 1986).

109 e Silva, LinsCinco Chagas,” p. 335.Google Scholar

110 See Lima, and Britto, , “Salud y nación,” p. 158,Google Scholar and Corrêa, MarizaAs ilusões da liberdade: a escola Nina Rodrigues e a antropologia no Brasil” (Ph.D. diss., University of São Paulo, 1982), p. 244.Google Scholar

111 Barros, Souza, A década 20 em Pernambuco (uma interpretção), 2nd. ed. (Recife: Fundação de Cultura Cidade do Recife, 1985), p. 197.Google Scholar See Aitino, , “Lição”;Google Scholar and e Silva, Augusto LinsLiçào inaugural de abertura de curso pelo livre-docente de medicina publica,” RAFDR 26 (1918), pp. 123–32.Google Scholar