Hostname: page-component-78c5997874-s2hrs Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-07T23:08:23.214Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Management Problems in Soviet Public Enterprise as Indicated by Arbitration Awards

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  25 January 2017

George I. Krynski
George I. Krynski*
Affiliation:
Russian Institute, Columbia University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The year 1931 was marked in Soviet economic legislation by a somersault and fundamental change of line. On March fourth of that year the Central Executive Committee and the Council of People's Commissars of the Union decreed the abolition of government agencies called “Arbitration Commissions” (Boards). This was done in order to foster the “strengthening of the unification of the judicial system” as well as “to develop economic discipline and to raise the responsibility of the economic units for their work.” Cases which had come under the jurisdiction of these boards were now placed under that of the civil courts

But on May third of the same year the Government reversed its policy in this respect, and decreed the re-creation of Government Arbitration in order to resolve all disputes arising between public, industrial, and commercial enterprises “with the aim of strengthening the discipline of contracts and plans as well as the settling of accounts among these enterprises.” This decree provides that the Arbitration Boards shall have jurisdiction over all disputes arising from contracts and deals among state-owned enterprises.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Slavic and East European Review , Volume 12 , Issue 2 , April 1953 , pp. 175 - 187
Copyright
Copyright © Association for Slavic, East European, and Eurasian Studies 1953

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Decree of March 4, 1931, No. 57/90, Sobranie zakonov i rasporjaženii (USSR) 1931, No. 14, text 1935, p. 205.

2 Decree of May 3, 1931, No. 5/298, Sobranie zakonov i rasporjaženii (USSR) l9ilt No. 26, text 203, p. 360.

3 Decree of December 8, 1931, No. 1085, Sobranie zakonov i rasporjaZenii (USSR) 1931, No. 69, text 470, p. 796.

4 Decree of June u, 1932, No. 853, Sobranie zakonov i rasporjazenii (USSR) 1932, No. 45, text 269, p. 419.

5 Decree of December 19, 1933, No. 2710, Sobranie zakonov i rasporjazenii (USSR) 1933, No. 73, text 445, p. 796.

6 Ibid.

7 Arbitral, No. 3, 1937, p. 20.

8 Arbitral, No. 4, 1937, p. 27.

9 Arbitral, No. 11, 1939, p. 28.

10 Arbitral, No. 1, 1938, p. 31.

11 Arbitral, No. 18, 1937, p. 30.

12 Arbitral, No. 9/10, 1938, p. 43.

13 Arbitral, No. 13, 1937, p. 17.

14 Arbitral, No. 9, 1939, p. 26.

15 Arbitral, No. 9, 1937, p. 28.

16 Arbitral, No. 5, 1937, p. 28.

17 Arbitral, No. 17, 1937, p. 24.

18 Arbitral, No. 6, 1937, p. 12.

19 Arbitral, No. 9, 1939, p. 28.

20 Arbitral, No. n/12, 1938, p. 39.

21 Arbitral, No. 9, 1937, p. 30.

22 Arbitral, No. 15, 1937, p. 22.

23 Arbitral, No. n/12, 1938, p. 30.

24 Arbitral, No. 13, 1937, p. 2.