Skip to main content Accessibility help

We use cookies to distinguish you from other users and to provide you with a better experience on our websites. Close this message to accept cookies or find out how to manage your cookie settings.

Close cookie message
×
  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. American Political Science Review
  4. Volume 61 Issue 2
Journal Home
Refine listing

Refine listing

Access:
Publication date:

Actions for selected content:

Select all | Deselect all
  • View selected items
  • Export citations
  • Download PDF (zip)
  • Save to Kindle
  • Save to Dropbox
  • Save to Google Drive

Save Search

You can save your searches here and later view and run them again in "My saved searches".

Please provide a title, maximum of 40 characters.
Cancel
×

Volume 61 - Issue 2 - June 1967

Contents

Page 1 of 6

Book Notes

International Politics, Law, and Organization

Reviews of Books

Book Notes

International Politics, Law, and Organization

Comparative Government and Politics

International Politics, Law, and Organization

Communications to the Editor

Book Notes

Political Theory, History of Political Thought and Methodology

Comparative Government and Politics

American Government and Politics

News and Notes

  • Other Activities

  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 August 2014, pp. 571-574
    • Article
      • You have access
    • PDF
    • Export citation

Reviews of Books

Book Notes

Comparative Government and Politics

International Politics, Law, and Organization

Comparative Government and Politics

International Politics, Law, and Organization

Research Article

  • Corruption and Political Development: A Cost-Benefit Analysis

  • J. S. Nye
  • Published online by Cambridge University Press:
    01 August 2014, pp. 417-427

  • “Private Vices by the dextrous Management of a skillful Politician may be turned into Publick Benefits.”

    —Bernard Mandeville, 1714

    Corruption, some say, is endemic in all governments. Yet it has received remarkably little attention from students of government. Not only is the study of corruption prone to moralism, but it involves one of those aspects of government in which the interests of the politician and the political scientist are likely to conflict. It would probably be rather difficult to obtain (by honest means) a visa to a developing country which is to be the subject of a corruption study.

    One of the first charges levelled at the previous regime by the leaders of the coup in the less developed country is “corruption.” And generally the charge is accurate. One type of reaction to this among observers is highly moralistic and tends to see corruption as evil. “Throughout the fabric of public life in newly independent States,” we are told in a recent work on the subject, “runs the scarlet thread of bribery and corruption …” which is like a weed suffocating better plants. Another description of new states informs us that “corruption and nepotism rot good intentions and retard progressive policies.”

    Others have reacted against this moralistic approach and warn us that we must beware of basing our beliefs about the cause of coups on post-coup rationalizations, and also of judging the social consequences of an act from the motives of the individuals performing it. Under some circumstances Mandeville is right that private vice can cause public benefit.

Reviews of Books

Book Notes

Comparative Government and Politics

American Government and Politics

Page 1 of 6