Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-j5c6p Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-03T17:16:03.489Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

What is “Right” in Hegel's Philosophy of Right?

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Steven B. Smith
Steven B. Smith
Affiliation:
Yale University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

I provide a thematic reconstruction of Hegel's positive concept of right. Against those who charge that Hegel denies any role to substantive political evaluation, I argue that the Philosophy of Right articulates a notion of the right to recognition (Anerkennung) as the central feature of the modern state. The concept of recognition, I contend, requires not just toleration of others but a more robust notion of respect for the “free personality” that is the philosophical ground of right. The right to recognition is, furthermore, intended to provide the foundation for a new form of ethical life (Sittlichkeit), Hegel's modern analogue to classical conceptions of civic virtue. In conclusion I examine briefly two objections that stand in the way of a contemporary rehabilitation of Hegelian political philosophy.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 83 , Issue 1 , March 1989 , pp. 3 - 18
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1989

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aristotle, . 1975. Nicomachean Ethics. Trans. Rackham, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aristotle, . 1977. Politics. Trans. Rackman, H.. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Aron, Raymond. 1957. The Opium of the Intellectuals. Trans. Kilmartin, Terence. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel. 1967. “Liberalism and the National Idea.” In Left, Right, and Center, ed. Goldwin, Robert. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Beer, Samuel. 1982. “The Idea of the Nation.” New Republic, 19/26 July.Google Scholar
Bell, Daniel. 1960. The End of Ideology: On the Exhaustion of Political Ideas in the Fifties. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Bernstein, J. M. 1984. “From Self-Consciousness to Community: Act and Recognition in the Master-Slave Relationship.” In The State and Civil Society, ed. Pelczynski, Z. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Michael B. 1935. The Political Philosophies of Plato and Hegel. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Frankfurt, Harry. 1971. “Freedom of the Will and the Concept of a Person.” Journal of Philosophy 67:5–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grice, H. P. 1957. “Meaning.” Philosophical Review 66:377–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Habermas, Jürgen. 1977. “Review of Gadamer's Truth and Method.” In Understanding and Social Inquiry, ed. Dallmayr, Fred R. and McCarthy, Thomas A.. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
Hart, H. L. A. 1979. “Between Rights and Utility.” In The Idea of Freedom, ed. Ryan, Alan. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hartz, Louis. 1955. The Liberal Tradition in America. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.Google Scholar
Haym, Rudolph. 1962. Hegel und seine Zeit. Hildesheim: Olms.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1956. Philosophy of History. Trans. Sibree, J.. New York: Dover.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1966. Phenomenology of Mind. Trans. Bailie, J. B.. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1971a. Philosophy of Mind: Being Part Three of the “Encyclopedia of the Philosophical Sciences.” Trans. Wallace, William and Miller, A. V.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1971b. Werke in zwanzig Bänden. Ed. Moldenhauer, Eva and Michel, Karl M.. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1972. Philosophy of Right. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Hegel, G. W. F. 1975. Natural Law. Trans. Knox, T. M.. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.Google Scholar
Hinchman, Lewis. 1984. “The Origins of Human Rights: A Hegelian Perspective.” Western Political Quarterly 37:7–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1962. Leviathan. Ed. Oakeshott, Michael. London: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Kelly, George A. 1978. Hegel's Retreat from Eleusis. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kojève, Alexandre. 1947. Introduction à la lecture de Hegel. Ed. Queneau, Raymond. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Koselleck, Rejnhart. 1985. Futures Past: On the Semantics of Historical Time. Trans. Tribe, Keith. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1959. Political Man. New York: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Marx, Karl. 1978. “Economic and Philosophic Manuscripts of 1844.” In Marx-Engels Reader, ed. Tucker, Robert. New York: W. W. Norton.Google Scholar
Mulgan, R. G. 1977. Aristotle's Political Theory. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Nisbet, Robert. 1966. The Sociological Tradition. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Oakeshott, Michael. 1975. On Human Conduct. Oxford: Clarendon.Google Scholar
Oppenheim, Felix. 1957. “The Natural Law Thesis: Affirmation or Denial?” American Political Science Review 51:41–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Popper, Karl. 1963. The Open Society and Its Enemies. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred. 1969. Studien zu Hegel's Rechtsphilosophie. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Riedel, Manfred, ed. 1975. Materialien zu Hegels Rechtsphilosophie. Vol. 1. Frankfurt: Suhrkamp.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. 1964. The First and Second Discourses. Trans. Roger, D. and Masters, Judith R.. New York: Saint Martin's.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith. 1971. “Hegel's Phenomenology: An Elegy for Hellas.” In Hegel's Political Philosophy, ed. Pelczynski, Z. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Smith, Steven B. 1986. “Hegel's Critique of Liberalism.” American Political Science Review 80:121–39.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Steiner, George. 1986. Antigones. Oxford: Clarendon.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Stillman, Peter. 1974. “Hegel's Critique of Liberal Theories of Rights.” American Political Science Review 68:1086–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taylor, Charles. 1979. Hegel and Modern Society. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Toews, John E. 1980. Hegelianism: The Path Toward Dialectical Humanism, 1805–1841. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Walsh, W. H. 1971. “Principle and Prejudice in Hegel's Philosophy of History.” In Hegel's Political Philosophy, ed. Pelczynski, Z. A.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Weber, Max. 1949. The Methodology of the Social Science. Trans. Shils, Edward and Finch, Henry. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.