Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:44:03.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Strategic Politicians and Unresponsive Voters

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Richard Born*
Affiliation:
Vassar College

Abstract

To resolve the paradoxical finding that economic conditions and presidential popularity powerfully relate to quadrennial movement in the House vote, but explain little individual voting variation, Jacobson and Kernell have advanced their “strategic politicians” model of midterm elections. Purportedly, the early-year political environment helps determine how many of a party's strong potential contenders risk challenging incumbents; voters in turn respond to the quality of candidates before them in November, and thus indirectly reward the party favored by this early-year environment. Despite its current prominence, however, the theory does not stand up to empirical investigation. A time-series equation of midterm outcomes regressed on early-year national conditions does not fare particularly well when contrasted with comparable equations assuming direct-effects voting. Furthermore, challenger quality has only a weak influence on individual voters—subordinate, in fact, to the effects of economic attitudes and presidential evaluations.

Type
Research Notes
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramowitz, Alan I. 1984. National Issues, Strategic Politicians, and Voting Behavior in the 1980 and 1982 Congressional Elections. American Journal of Political Science, 28:710–21.Google Scholar
Abramson, Paul R., Aldrich, John H., and Rohde, David W.. 1983. Change and Continuity in the 1980 Elections, rev. ed. Washington, D.C.: Congressional Quarterly Press.Google Scholar
Bianco, William T. 1984. Strategic Decisions on Candidacy in U.S. Congressional Districts. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 9:351–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bonafede, Dom. October 30, 1982. Some Things Don't Change—Cost of 1982 Congressional Races Higher than Ever. National Journal, pp. 1832–36.Google Scholar
Bond, Jon R., Covington, Cary, and Fleisher, Richard. 1985. Explaining Challenger Quality in Congressional Elections. Journal of Politics, 47:510–29.Google Scholar
Brace, Paul. 1985. A Probabilistic Approach to Retirement from the U.S. Congress. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 10:107–23.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. January 9, 1982a. Congress: Control at Stake. National Journal, pp. 5969.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. September 4, 1982b. Keep the Bums In. National Journal, p. 1519.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. April 2, 1983a. 1982 Post Mortem. National Journal, p. 712.Google Scholar
Cohen, Richard E. October 1, 1983b. Covering Congress. National Journal, p. 2018.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1966. Eastern States Roundup. 30 September, 2264–93.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1966. Southern States Roundup. 7 October, 2348–85.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1966. Western States Roundup. 14 October, 2432–61.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1966. Midwestern States Roundup. 21 October, 2508–41.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1970. Election 1970: The East. 2 October, 2359–87.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1970. Election 1970: The Midwest. 9 October, 2507–35.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1970. Election 1970: The South. 16 October, 2587–607.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1970. Election 1970: The West. 23 October, 2435–55.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1974. The 1974 Election Report. 12 October, 2715–815.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1978. The 1978 Elections. 14 October, 2797–914.Google Scholar
Congressional Quarterly Weekly Report. 1982. The 1982 Elections. 9 October, 2481–610.Google Scholar
Fowler, Linda L. 1976. The Cycle of Defeat: Recruitment of Congressional Candidates. Ph.D. diss., University of Rochester.Google Scholar
The Gallup Opinion Index. 1980. The Presidency. October–November, 339.Google Scholar
The Gallup Report. 1983. President Reagan Ends 1983 with Highest Approval Rating in Two Years. December, 1429.Google Scholar
Huckshorn, Robert J., and Spencer, Robert C.. 1971. The Politics of Defeat: Campaigning for Congress. Amherst: University of Massachusetts Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1981. Strategic Politicians and Congressional Elections, 1946–1980. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, New York.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1983a. The Politics of Congressional Elections. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1983b. Reagan, Reaganomics, and Strategic Politics in 1982: A Test of Alternative Theories of Midterm Congressional Elections. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1981. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections. 2d ed. 1983. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1982. Strategy and Choice in the 1982 Congressional Elections. PS, 15:423–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kiewiet, D. Roderick. 1983. Macroeconomics and Micropolitics: The Electoral Effects of Economic Issues. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Kramer, Gerald H. 1983. The Electoral Fallacy Revisited: Aggregate Versus Individual-Level Findings on Economics and Elections, and Sociotropic Voting. American Political Science Review, 77:94111.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Maisel, Louis S. 1982. From Obscurity to Oblivion: Running in the Congressional Primary. Knoxville: The University of Tennessee Press.Google Scholar
Mann, Thomas E. 1977. Unsafe at Any Margin: Interpreting Congressional Elections. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute.Google Scholar
Nelson, Candice. 19781979. The Effects of Incumbency on Voting in Congressional Elections. Political Science Quarterly, 93:665–78.Google Scholar
Norpoth, Helmut, and Yantek, Thorn. 1983. Macroeconomic Conditions and Fluctuations of Presidential Popularity: The Question of Lagged Effects. American Journal of Political Science, 27:785807.Google Scholar
Robeck, Bruce W. 1982. State Legislator Candidacies for the U.S. House: Prospects for Success. Legislative Studies Quarterly, 7:507–14.Google Scholar
Tufte, Edward R. 1978. Political Control of the Economy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1981. The National Income and Product Accounts of the United States, 1929–76, Statistical Tables. Washington, D.C., SeptemberGoogle Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1982. Survey of Current Business, vol. 62, no. 7.Google Scholar
U.S. Department of Commerce, Bureau of Economic Analysis. 1984. Survey of Current Business, vol. 64, no. 7.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.