Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-gb8f7 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T20:08:16.544Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

State Morality in International Relations

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Bruce Williams*
Affiliation:
University of Virginia

Extract

Much has recently been said concerning the moral obligations of the state. It is not infrequently asserted that it is the moral duty of a state to assume some function in the interest of international society. The reaction against the philosophy which considered all state action as moral and which posited the realization of national aims as a paramount ethical end, has been followed by an increasing emphasis on the ethical liability of the state to interests in addition to its own.

In attributing moral obligations to the state, the ethical standards of the individual are frequently invoked as applicable to state conduct, and upon this analogy judgment is often pronounced on problems of international right and wrong. The question, however, defies settlement by this simple identification of two moral entities essentially dissimilar in their nature. The ascription of ethical duties to the state, wholesome as it is readily conceded to be, requires considerable analysis lest an undue inference be drawn from the mere fact of its admission. To concede the state as a moral entity does not of itself suffice. The manner of its response to moral questions; its distinctive position in a society which yet lacks many of the elemental requisites for moral progress; the forces limiting the movement of international ethics to a higher level—an inquiry into problems such as these would seem more profitable than the constant reiteration of a principle which probably few persons would longer be disposed to deny.

Type
Research Article
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1923

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 See the analysis of “The Juristic Conception of the State,” by Willoughby 12 American Political Science Review, No. 2, May, 1918.

2 Dewey, German Philosophy and Politics.

3 Willoughby, , Prussian Political Philosophy, p. 58.Google Scholar See also an article by ProfessorTufts, James H. on “Ethics and International Relations,” 28 International Journal of Ethics, p. 299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

4 Sorley, W. R.The Theory of the State; Oxford University Press, p. 36Google Scholar, Cf. also Vaughan, C. E., The Political Writings of Rousseau, II, p. 518–19.Google Scholar

5 Politics, I, p. 85; Trans. Dugdale and Torben De Bille.

6 Ibid. p. 81.

7 Ibid. p. 94.

8 Willoughby, , The Nature of the State, p. 4.Google Scholar

9 See the exposition of this idea with especial reference to the ethics of intervention, in an article by Lovejoy, Arthur O. entitled “Ethics and International Relations,” Bulletin of Washington University Association, April, 1904.Google Scholar

10 An interesting analysis of the negative character of international morality is given by Senior, in an essay reviewing Wheaton's, History of the Progress of the Law of Nations, 77 Edinburgh Review, p. 303, April, 1843.Google Scholar

11 From an essay on “Public Morality,” p. 45, published under the title of “National and International Right and Wrong.” London, 1918.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.