Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-tf8b9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:54:51.642Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

State Governmental Organization, Proposed Reforms in

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

W. F. Dodd
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Notes on Current Legislation
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 4 , Issue 2 , May 1910 , pp. 243 - 251
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1910

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

page 249 note 1 State Boards and Commissions. Political Science Quarterly, xviii, 631, 654.

page 249 note 2 New York State Library Review of Legislation, 1905, p. 151.Google Scholar For general reviews of this subject see ProfessorMerriam, in New York State Library Reviews of Legislation, 1901–1906Google Scholar, and the Indexes of Legislation 1907–1908. See also Sparling, , State Boards of Control, Annals American Academy of Political and Social Science, xvii, 74Google Scholar; and Blue, Recent Tendencies in State Administration, ibid, xviii, 434.

page 250 note 1 Governor Hughes statements in 1909 may be conveniently found in Beard's, Readings in American Government and Politics. 436–438.Google Scholar

page 251 note 1 This note was originally written for the February number of this Review. Since it was written another pamphlet has been received which was published by the Oregon reformers in January, 1910. In this later pamphlet some changes are made in the plan outlined above. “Because of strong opposition the provisions requiring initiative measures to be submitted to the legislature before being voted on by the people, and also the limitation on the number of measures that may be submitted by the legislature, are stricken out.” Active steps are being taken to have the Oregon proposals submitted to the people by initative petition at the November election.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.