Hostname: page-component-5cf477f64f-r2nwp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-04-05T22:55:11.985Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Spatial Bargaining Theory of Government Formation in Parliamentary Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

David P. Baron
David P. Baron*
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A theory of government formation in parliamentary systems is developed from a model incorporating policy-oriented parties with spatial preferences and a formation process in which parties are selected in sequence to attempt to form a government. A government is formed when the policy proposed by the party selected is sustained on a vote of confidence. The equilibria identify the government and the policy it will implement and depend on the configuration of preferences and on the government formation process. For example, in a political system with two large parties and one small party and in which one of the two large parties will be selected to attempt to form a government, the government will be formed by a large party with the support of the small party. The policy will reflect the preferences of the small party but will be closer to the ideal point of the large party.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 85 , Issue 1 , March 1991 , pp. 137 - 164
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1991 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aumann, Robert J., and Maschler, M.. 1964. “The Bargaining Set for Cooperative Games.” In Advances in Game Theory, ed. Drescher, Melvin. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1988. “Elections, Coalitions, and Legislative Outcomes.” American Political Science Review 82:405–22.Google Scholar
Austen-Smith, David, and Banks, Jeffrey. 1990. “Stable Governments and the Allocation of Policy Portfolios.” American Political Science Review 84:891–906.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert. 1970. Conflict of Interest. Chicago: Markham.Google Scholar
Baron, David P. 1989. “A Noncooperative Theory of Legislative Coalitions.” American Journal of Political Science 33:1048–84.Google Scholar
Baron, David P., and Ferejohn, John A.. 1989. “Bargaining in Legislatures.” American Political Science Review 83:1181–1206.Google Scholar
Black, Duncan. 1958. The Theory of Committees and Elections. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, and Hearl, Derek, eds. 1987. Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change: Spatial Analyses of Post-War Election Programmes in Nineteen Democracies. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Daalder, Hans. 1986. “Changing Procedures and Changing Strategies in Dutch Coalition Formation.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:507–31.Google Scholar
de Swaan, Abram. 1973. Coalition Theories and Cabinet Formations. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
Dodd, Laurence C. 1976. Coalitions in Parliamentary Government. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Horner, F. 1987. “Austria: 1945–1978.” In Ideology, Strategy, and Party Change, ed. Budge, Ian, Robertson, David, and Hearl, Derek. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and N.d., Ian Budge. Party Policy and Coalition Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Schofield, Norman. 1990. Multiparty Government: The Politics of Coalition in Europe. Oxford: Oxford University Press. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1990. “Coalitions and Cabinet Government.” American Political Science Review 84:873–90.Google Scholar
Laver, Michael, and Shepsle, Kenneth. 1989. “Government Coalitions and Intraparty Politics.” Harvard University. Typescript.Google Scholar
McKelvey, Richard D., Ordeshook, Peter C., and Weiner, M.. 1978. “The Competitive Solution for n-Person Games without Transferable Utility with an Application to Committee Games.” American Political Science Review 72:599–615.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, Peter C. 1986. Game Theory and Political Theory: An Introduction. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Riker, William. 1962. The Theory of Political Coalitions. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Robertson, J. D. 1986. “Economic Polarization and Cabinet Formation in Western Europe.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:533–49.Google Scholar
Schofield, Norman. 1989. “Strategy of Party Competition.” Washington University. Typescript.Google Scholar
Schofield, Norman, Grofman, Bernard, and Feld, S. L.. 1988. “The Core and the Stability of Group Choice in Spatial Voting Games.” American Political Science Review 82:195–211.Google Scholar
Strom, Kaare. 1986. “Deferred Gratification and Minority Governments in Scandinavia.” Legislative Studies Quarterly 11:583–605.Google Scholar
Strom, Kaare. 1990. Minority Government and Majority Rule. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.