Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dsjbd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T19:10:11.352Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Some Reflections on the Sociological Character of Political Parties

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Roberto Michels
Roberto Michels
Affiliation:
Universities of Basle and Turin
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The political party, etymologically and logically, can embrace only a part of the citizenry, politically organized. The party is a fraction; it is pars pro toto. Let us endeavor briefly to analyze its causal origin and its behavior.

According to Max Weber, the political party has a dual teleology. It is a spontaneous society of propaganda and of agitation seeking to acquire power, in order to procure thereby for its active militant adherents chances, ideal and material, for the realization either of objective aims or of personal advantages, or of both. Consequently, the general orientation of the political party, whether in its personal or impersonal aspect, is that of Machtstreben (striving to power).

In the personal aspect, parties are often based on the protection accorded inferiors by a strong man. In the Prussian diet of 1855, which was composed of a large number of political groups, each was given the name of its leader.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 21 , Issue 4 , November 1927 , pp. 753 - 772
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Weber, Max, Wirtschaft und Gesellschaft. Grundriss der Sorialökonomik, III. (2nd ed., Tübingen, 1925), pp. 167, 639Google Scholar.

2 Naumann, Friedrich, Die politischen Parteien (Berlin 1910), p. 8Google Scholar.

3 Charney, Maurice, Les Allemanistes (Paris, 1912), p. 25Google Scholar.

4 Yves-Guyot, , La Comédie socialiste (Paris, 1897), p. 111Google Scholar.

5 Michels, Robert, Political Parties (London, 1917), p. 67 ff.Google Scholar

6 Rappoport, Charles, Jean Jaurès; L'Homme—Le Penseur—Le Socialiste (2nd ed., Paris, 1916), p. 366Google Scholar.

7 Cf., for America, Merriam, C. E., The American Party System, p. 5Google Scholar.

8 Introduction to Political Parties and Practical Politics (3rd ed.), p. 5Google Scholar.

9 Mancini, Pasquale Stanislao, “Delia nazionalità come fondamento del diritto delle genti”, in Diritto internazionale; Prelezioni (Naples, 1873)Google Scholar; Mamiani, Terenzio, D'un nuovo diritto europeo (Turin, 1860)Google Scholar; Carle, G., Pasquale Stanislao Mancini e la teoria psicologica del sentimento nazionale. Discorso letto alia R. Accademia dei Lincei (Rome, 1890)Google Scholar; Palma, Luigi, Del principio di nazionalità (Milan, 1863)Google Scholar.

10 Georges Sorel, Lettre à Halévy, M. Daniel, dans Le Mouvement Socialiste, 9ème année no. 189, tome 190, 16 août et 15 septembre, 1907, pp. 142–143Google Scholar.

11 Political Parties (New York, 1915, and London, 1917)Google Scholar.

12 Jean-Jacques Rousseau, Contrat Social.

13 Cf. Michels, Robert, in the Verhandlungen des Kongresses des deutschen Institutes für Soziologie, Vienna, September 27, 1926 (Tubingen, 1927)Google Scholar.

14 Philosophiae moralis institutio compendiaria (Glasgow, 1742)Google Scholar, Bk III, Chap. viii.

15 Pareto, Vilfredo, Trattato di Sociologia generale (Florence, 1916), Vol. II, p. 248Google Scholar.

16 La logique sociale (Paris), p. 297Google Scholar.

17 “Une campagne royaliste”, Figaro, Aug., 1901–Jan. 1902, p. 32Google Scholar.

18 Latter Day Pamphlets, No. 5: Stump Orator, p. 167 (Works of Thomas Carlyle, Standard Edition, Vol. Ill, London, 1906).

19 Michels, , “Psychologie der antikapitalistischen Massenbewegung”, Grundriss der Sozialökonomik, Vol. IX, No. 1 (1926), p. 326Google Scholar.

20 Naumann, Friedrich, Demokratie und Kaisertum (Berlin, 1904), p. 92Google Scholar.

21 Jouvenel, Robert de, La République des Camarades (Paris, 1924), p. 69Google Scholar.

22 Stern, Daniel (Comtesse d'Agoult), Histoire de la Révolution de 1848 (Paris, 1887), Vol. II, p. 318Google Scholar.

23 Spahn, Martin, Das deutsche Zentrum (Mayence), pp. 62–63Google Scholar.

24 Giornale d'Italia, April 13, 1923.

25 De Jouvenel, p. 66.

26 Pareto, Vol. II, p. 638.

27 Elementi di seienza politica (Turin, 1923), p. 462Google Scholar

28 Raumer, Friedrich von, Briefe aus Paris und Frankreich im Jahre 1830 (Leipzig, 1831), p. 26Google Scholar.

29 Maurois, André, Dialogues sur le commandement (Paris, 1925), p. 170Google Scholar.

30 The rise and development of the élite receives chief attention in my course given in the department of political science in the University of Rome and published in 1926 under the title Corso d'Sodohgia Politica (Milan, De Marsico)Google Scholar.

31 Aulard, A., Le patriotisme française de la Renaissance à la Revolution (Paris 1921), pp. 93, 85Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.