Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-f46jp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-05T12:48:57.494Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Socialist Threat? Radical Party Entry, Electoral Alliances, and the Introduction of Proportional Representation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  18 November 2020

ANDRÉ WALTER Open the ORCID record for ANDRÉ WALTER [Opens in a new window]
ANDRÉ WALTER*
Affiliation:
University of St. Gallen
*
André Walter, Postdoctoral Researcher, Department of Political Science, University of St. Gallen, [email protected].
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

A substantial body of research shows that the entry of socialist parties to the electoral arena is linked to major political and economic reforms at the beginning of the twentieth century. However, how socialist parties have affected electoral competition and coordination has never been investigated in detail. Drawing on the debate of the adoption of proportional representation, I employ a regression discontinuity design to estimate the casual effect of socialist entry to the electoral arena on the formation of electoral alliances and the support of established parties. To do so, I use newly collected data for Imperial Germany 1890–1912. I show that established parties facing strong socialist competitors received more endorsement by other non-socialist parties and, as a result, a higher voter share. The findings suggest that established parties were able to mitigate coordination problems within the institutional setting of majoritarian electoral systems.

Type
Letter
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 115 , Issue 2 , May 2021 , pp. 701 - 708
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2020. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I thank Patrick Emmenegger and the anonymous reviewers for their excellent comments. An earlier version of this paper has been presented at the meeting of the Political Economy Research Group at the University of St. Gallen, the Department Seminar of the Institute of Political Science at the University of Tübingen, the ECPR General Conference in Hamburg, and the German Political Science Association General Conference in Frankfurt. I thank all participants for the feedback. All remaining errors are my responsibility. Replication materials are available at the American Political Science Review Dataverse: https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/383K6K.

References

Boix, Carles. 1999. “Setting the Rules of the Game: The Choice of Electoral Systems in Advanced Democracies.” American Political Science Review 93 (3): 609–624.10.2307/2585577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boix, Carles. 2010. “Electoral Markets, Party Strategies, and Proportional Representation.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 404–413.10.1017/S0003055410000146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Calvo, Ernesto. 2009. “The Competitive Road to Proportional Representation: Partisan Biases and Electoral Regime Change under Increasing Party Competition.” World Politics 61 (2): 254–295.10.1017/S0043887109000100CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cox, Gary, Fiva, Jon H., and Smith, Daniel M.. 2019. “Parties, Legislators, and the Origins of Proportional Representation.” Comparative Political Studies 52 (1): 102–132.10.1177/0010414018762369CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cusack, Thomas, Iversen, Torben, and Soskice, David. 2007. “Economic Interests and the Origins of Electoral Systems.” American Political Science Review 101 (3): 373–391.10.1017/S0003055407070384CrossRefGoogle Scholar
De la Cuesta, Brandon, and Imai, Kosuke. 2016. “Misunderstandings about the Regression Discontinuity Design in the Study of Close Elections.” Annual Review of Political Science 19 (1): 375–396.10.1146/annurev-polisci-032015-010115CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Eggers, Andrew C., Fowler, Anthony, Hainmueller, Jens, Hall, Andrew B., and Snyder, James M. Jr. 2015. “On the Validity of the Regression Discontinuity Design for Estimating Electoral Effects: New Evidence from Over 40,000 Close Races.” American Journal of Political Science 59 (1): 259–274.10.1111/ajps.12127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huber, Ernst Rudolf. 1978. Deutsche Verfassungsgeschichte Seit 1789. Weltkrieg, Revolution Und Reichserneuerung 1914-1919. Stuttgart: Kohlhammer.Google Scholar
Indridason, Indridi. 2008. “Competition & Turnout: The Majority Run-Off as a Natural Experiment.” Electoral Studies 27 (4): 699–710.10.1016/j.electstud.2008.05.006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kreuzer, Marcus. 2010. “Historical Knowledge and Quantitative Analysis: The Case of the Origins of Proportional Representation.” American Political Science Review 104 (2): 369–392.10.1017/S0003055410000122CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leemann, Lucas, and Mares, Isabela. 2014. “The Adoption of Proportional Representation.” Journal of Politics 76 (2): 461–478.10.1017/S0022381613001394CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackie, Thomas T., and Rose, Richard. 1982. The International Almanac of Electoral History. London: MacMillan.10.1007/978-1-349-06321-5CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Reibel, Carl-Wilhelm. 2007. Handbuch der Reichstagswahlen 1890-1918. Bündnisse, Ergebnisse, Kandidaten. Erster Halbband. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Rokkan, Stein. 1970. Citizens, Elections, Parties. Approaches to the Comparative Study of the Processes of Development Colchester: ECPR.Google Scholar
Schanbacher, Eberhard. 1982. Parlamentarische Wahlen und Wahlsystem in der Weimarer Republik. Düsseldorf: Droste.Google Scholar
Schröder, Valentin, and Manow, Philip. 2020. “An Intra-Party Account of Electoral System Choice.” Political Science Research and Methods 8 (2): 251–267.10.1017/psrm.2018.58CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Supplementary material: Link

Walter Dataset

Dataset

https://doi.org/10.7910/DVN/383K6K
Link
Supplementary material: PDF

Walter supplementary material

Walter supplementary material

Download Walter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 561.8 KB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.