Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T14:40:46.483Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Ada W. Finifter
Affiliation:
Michigan State University
Ellen Mickiewicz
Affiliation:
Emory University and The Carter Center

Abstract

Using data from a national public opinion survey carried out in the Soviet Union during November and December 1989, we explore two attitudes relevant to the revolutionary changes there: (1) attitudes toward change and political democracy and (2) attitudes toward a core component of socialist ideology, the locus of responsibility for social well-being (the state or individuals?). These variables are unrelated, with the sample relatively evenly divided among the intersecting cells of a cross tabulation. While social conflict may be mitigated by the small sizes of absolutely opposing groups, consensus may also be hard to reach. Ethnicity, education, income, age, party membership, and life satisfaction have important effects on these attitudes. We discuss how attitude patterns in our data may be related to the disintegration of the Soviet Union and to problems faced by the independent successor states as they develop new institutions and foster new values.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Bahry, Donna. 1987. “Politics, Generations, and Change in the USSR.” In Politics, Work, and Daily Life in the USSR, ed. Millar, James R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bez raboty sredy morya raboty” [Without work in a sea of work]. 1989. Argumenty i fakty 45:4.Google Scholar
Bialer, Seweryn. 1986. The Soviet Paradox. New York: Knopf.Google Scholar
Breslauer, George. 1982. Khrushchev and Brezhnev as Leaders. London: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Brown, Thad A. 1981. “On Contextual Change and Partisan Attributes.” British Journal of Political Science 11:427–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, Thad A. 1988. Migration and Politics: The Impact of Population Mobility on American Voting Behavior. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
Carnaghan, Ellen, and Bahry, Donna. 1990. “Political Attitudes and the Gender Gap in the USSR.” Comparative Politics, July, pp. 379–99.Google Scholar
Eckstein, Harry. 1988. “A Culturalist Theory of Political Change.” American Political Science Review 82:789804.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finifter, Ada W., and Finifter, Bernard M.. 1989. “Party Identification and Political Adaptation of American Migrants in Australia.” Journal of Politics 51:599630.Google Scholar
Guboglo, M. N. 1990. “Natsionalny vopros: Predposylka perestroiki” [The nationality question: Assumption of perestroika]. In Sotsiologia perestroiki, ed. Yadov, V. A.. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Hewett, A. Ed 1988. Reforming the Soviet Economy: Equality Versus Efficiency. Washington: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
Hough, Jerry. 1988. Russia and the West: Gorbachev and the Politics of Reform. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
Inglehart, Ronald. 1990. Culture Shift in Advanced Industrial Society. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent. 1983. “Gender Roles and Inequalities in Political Participation: Results from an Eight-Nation Study.” Western Political Quarterly 36:364–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, et al. 1990. Continuities in Political Action. Berlin: de Gruyter.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jennings, M. Kent, and Niemi, Richard G.. 1981. Generations and Politics: A Panel Study of Young Adults and Their Parents. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karklins, Rasma. 1987. “Nationality Policy and Ethnic Relations in the USSR.” In Politics, Work, and Daily Life in the USSR, ed. Millar, James R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Lane, David. 1990. Soviet Society under Perestroika. Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Levada, I. A., and Sedov, A. A.. 1990. “Prichiny trudnostei i orientiry peremen” [Reasons for the difficulty in orienting change]. Obshchestvennoe mnenie v tsifrakh 6(13):913.Google Scholar
Lubin, Nancy. 1984. Labour and Nationality in Soviet Central Asia. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Mikhailova, L. 1989. “O problemakh mezhnatsionalnykh otnoshenii” [On problems of internationality relations]. Auditoria 10:310.Google Scholar
Novikova, L. G., Ovsyannikov, A. A., and Rotman, D. G.. 1989. “Stereotipy istoricheskogo samosoznania” [Stereotypes of historical self-consciousness]. Sotsiologicheskie issledovania 5:312.Google Scholar
Olcott, Martha Brill. 1987. The Kazakhs. Stanford: Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Olcott, Martha Brill. 1990. “Youth and Nationality in the USSR.” Journal of Soviet Nationalities 1:128–39.Google Scholar
Pochemu otstaet Partia?” [Why is the Party behind?] 1989. Argumenty i fakty 36:13.Google Scholar
Prozhitochny minimum” [The minimum standard of living]. 1990. Argumenty i fakty 14:2.Google Scholar
Radio Liberty. 1982. “Observations on ‘Affirmative Action’ in Kazakhstan.” Soviet Area Audience and Opinion Research. BGR #4-82.Google Scholar
Rumer, Boris. 1989. Soviet Central Asia: “A Tragic Experiment.” Boston: Unwin Hyman.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Robert Y., and Mahajan, Harpreet. 1986. “Gender Differences in Policy Preferences: A Summary of Trends from the 1960s to the 1980s.” Public Opinion Quarterly 50:4261.Google Scholar
Silver, Brian. 1987. “Political Beliefs of the Soviet Citizen: Sources of Support for Regime Norms.” In Politics, Work, and Daily life in the USSR, ed. Millar, James R.. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Suny, Ronald Grigor. 1988. The Making of the Georgian Nation. Bloomington and Stanford: Indiana University Press and Hoover Institution.Google Scholar
Toshchenko, Z. T. 1990. “Sostoyanie i protivorechia obshchestvennogo soznania k kontsu 1988 goda” [The condition and contradictions of public consciousness at the end of 1988]. In Sotsiologia perestroki, ed. Yadov, V. A.. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Zaslavskaya, T. I. 1990. “Perestroika kak sotsialnaya revolyutsia” [Perestroika as a social revolution]. In Sotsiologia perestroiki, ed. Yadov, V. A.. Moscow: Nauka.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.