Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T20:59:37.414Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Rational Choice and Rebellious Collective Action

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Edward N. Muller
Affiliation:
University of Arizona
Karl-Dieter Opp
Affiliation:
Universität Hamburg

Abstract

A basic problem for a rational choice theory of rebellious collective action is to explain why average citizens would participate in such behavior, since they have nothing to gain (they will receive benefits of successful rebellion, in terms of public goods, regardless of whether they take part or not), but much to lose (rebellious behavior may be quite costly). According to the conventional private interest or “by-product” theory, the incentive to participate must come from the expectation of receiving selective benefits; but since average citizens in a general case cannot expect substantial private material rewards, the relevant selective benefits must be psychological in nature. In contrast to the model of private interest theory, a public goods model is proposed, stipulating that the value of rebellion in terms of public goods can be a relevant incentive for participation. Using data from surveys conducted in New York City and Hamburg, West Germany, we investigate the relationship between participation in rebellious political behavior and measures of the incentives of public goods and private interest. The results do not support predictions of the private interest model in regard to nonmaterial selective incentives. Hypotheses of the public goods model are supported.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aldrich, John H. 1976. Some Problems in Testing Two Rational Models of Participation. American Journal of Political Science, 20:713–33.Google Scholar
Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bandura, Albert. 1973. Aggression: A Social Learning Analysis. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Barry, Brian. 1978. Sociologists, Economists and Democracy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Easton, David. 1965. A Systems Analysis of Political Life. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Hardin, Russell. 1978. Groups in the Regulation of Collective Bads. Presented at the annual meeting of the Public Choice Society, New Orleans, La.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political Man. Garden City, NY: Doubleday, Anchor Books.Google Scholar
Mason, David. 1984. Individual Participation in Collective Racial Violence: A Rational Choice Perspective. American Political Science Review, 78:1040–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mueller, Dennis. 1979. Public Choice. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N. 1979. Aggressive Political Participation. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., Jukam, Thomas O., and Seligson, Mitchell A.. 1982. Diffuse Political Support and Antisystem Political Behavior: A Comparative Analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 26:240–64.Google Scholar
Olson, Mancur. 1971. The Logic of Collective Action. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1986. Soft Incentives and Collective Action. British Journal of Political Science, 16:87112.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, Buro-Auffarth, Käte, Hartmann, Peter, von Witzleben, Thomazine, Pöhls, Volker, and Spitzley, Thomas. 1984. Soziale Problems und Protestverhalten [Social problems and protest behavior]. Wiesbaden: Westdeutscher Verlag.Google Scholar
Salert, Barbara. 1976. Revolutions and Revolutionaries: Four Theories. New York: Elsevier.Google Scholar
Silver, Morris. 1974. Political Revolution and Repression: An Economic Approach. Public Choice, 17:6371.Google Scholar
Tullock, Gordon. 1971. The Paradox of Revolution. Public Choice, 11:8999.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.