Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dk4vv Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:28:41.585Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Public Consequences of Private Inequality: Family Life and Citizen Participation

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Nancy Burns
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Kay Lehman Schlozman
Affiliation:
Boston College
Sidney Verba
Affiliation:
Harvard University

Abstract

This study uses regression analysis of data from a telephone survey of 380 married couples to subject to rare empirical test the contention that, because women are unequal at home, they cannot be equal in the polity. The argument is often made that wives' disadvantage in comparison to their husbands with respect to control over family income, availability of free time, power over decisions, or mutual respect dampens their ability to participate fully in politics. In fact, domestic inequalities do have implications for political activity, but these effects differ from what is usually posited by being stronger for husbands than for wives. For husbands, control over major financial decisions and autonomy in using small amounts of time enhance their ability to participate in politics beyond what would be expected on the basis of their other characteristics. In short, being boss at home is politically empowering to husbands.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Almond, Gabriel A., and Verba, Sidney. 1963. The Civic Culture. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Aquilino, William S. 1993. “Effects of Spouse Presence during the Interview on Survey Responses Concerning Marriage.” Public Opinion Quarterly 57 (Fall):358–76.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Morris, and Blood, Robert. [1955] 1974. Detroit Area Study, 1955: A Description of Urban Kinship Patterns and the Urban Family. [Computer file.] Conducted by University of Michigan, Department of Sociology. ICPSR study #7319. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [producer and distributor].Google Scholar
Beckwith, Karen. 1986. American Women and Political Participation. New York: Greenwood.Google Scholar
Bennett, Stephen Earl, and Bennett, Linda L. M.. 1986. “Political Participation.” In Annual Review of Political Science, ed. Long, Samuel. Norwood, NJ: Ablex Publishing.Google Scholar
Bird, Gloria W., Bird, Gerald A., and Scruggs, Marguerite. 1984. “Determinants of Family Task Sharing: A Study of Husbands and Wives.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 46 (05):345–55.Google Scholar
Blood, Robert O. Jr., and Wolfe, Donald M.. 1968. Husbands and Wives: The Dynamics of Married Living. New York: The Free Press.Google Scholar
Blumberg, Rae Lesser, and Coleman, Marion Tolbert. 1989. “A Theoretical Look at the Gender Balance of Power in the American Couple.” Journal of Family Issues 10 (06):225–50.Google Scholar
Blumstein, Philip, and Schwartz, Pepper. 1983. The American Couple: Money, Work, and Sex. New York: Morrow.Google Scholar
Bollen, Kenneth A. 1989. Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley.Google Scholar
Brady, Henry E., Verba, Sidney, and Schlozman, Kay Lehman. 1995. “Beyond SES: A Resource Model of Participation.” American Political Science Review 89 (06):271–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brines, Julie. 1994. “Economic Dependency, Gender, and the Division of Labor at Home.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (11):652–88.Google Scholar
Browning, Martin. 1992. “Children and Household Economic Behavior.” Journal of Economic Literature 30 (09):1434–75.Google Scholar
Burns, Nancy. 1995. “The Choices and Constraints of Gender.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Science Association, Chicago.Google Scholar
Conway, Margaret. 1991. Political Participation in the United States. 2d ed. Washington, DC: CQ Press.Google Scholar
Douhitt, Robin A. 1989. “The Division of Labor within the Home: Have Gender Roles Changed?Sex Roles 20 (06):693704.Google Scholar
Epstein, Cynthia Fuchs. 1988. Deceptive Distinctions: Sex, Gender, and the Social Order. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Goode, William J. 1971. “Force and Violence in the Family.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 33 (11):624–36.Google Scholar
Hochschild, Arlie. 1989. The Second Shift. New York: Viking.Google Scholar
Huston, Ted L., and Geis, Gilbert. 1993. “In What Ways Do Gender-Related Attributes and Beliefs Affect Marriage?Journal of Marriage and the Family 49 (Fall):87106.Google Scholar
Lennon, Mary Clare, and Rosenfeld, Sarah. 1994. “Relative Fairness and the Division of Housework: The Importance of Options.” American Journal of Sociology 100 (09):506–31.Google Scholar
Milbrath, Lester W., and Goel, M. L.. 1977. Political Participation. 2d ed. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Oakley, Ann. 1974. The Sociology of Housework. New York: Pantheon.Google Scholar
Okin, Susan Moller. 1989. Justice, Gender, and the Family. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Pahl, J. M. 1989. Money and Marriage. New York: St. Martin's.Google Scholar
Phillips, Anne. 1991. Engendering Democracy. Cambridge, UK: Polity.Google Scholar
Rubin, Lillian B. [1976] 1992. Worlds of Pain. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Sapiro, Virginia. 1983. The Political Integration of Women. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Scanzoni, John, and Fox, Greer Litton. 1980. “Sex Roles, Family and Society: The Seventies and Beyond.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 42 (11):743–58.Google Scholar
Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Burns, Nancy E., and Verba, Sidney. 1994. “Gender and the Pathways to Participation: The Role of Resources.” Journal of Politics 56 (05):963–90.Google Scholar
Schor, Juliet. 1992. The Overworked American: The Unexpected Decline of Leisure. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
South, Scott J., and Spitze, Glenna. 1994. “Housework in Marital and Nonmarital Households.” American Sociological Review 59 (06):327–47.Google Scholar
Starrels, Marjorie E. 1994. “Husbands' Involvement in Female Gender-Typed Household Chores.” Sex Roles 31 (10):473–91.Google Scholar
Stoker, Laura, and Jennings, M. Kent. 1995. “Life-Cycle Transitions and Political Participation: The Case of Marriage.” American Political Science Review 89 (06):421–33.Google Scholar
Thompson, Linda, and Walker, Alexis J.. 1989. “Gender in Families.” Journal of Marriage and the Family 51 (11):845–71.Google Scholar
Thornton, Arland, and Freedman, Deborah. 1979. “Changes in the Sex Role Attitudes of Women, 1962–1977: Evidence from a Panel Study.” American Sociological Review 44 (10):831–42.Google Scholar
Tolleson-Rinehart, Sue. 1992. Gender Consciousness and Politics. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, and Nie, Norman H.. 1972. Participation in America: Political Democracy and Social Equality. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, and Brady, Henry E.. 1995. Voice and Equality: Civic Voluntarism in American Politics. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Verba, Sidney, Schlozman, Kay Lehman, Brady, Henry E., and Nie, Norman. 1990. “American Citizen Participation Study” [Computer file]. ICPSR version. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago, National Opinion Research Center (NORC) [producer], 1995. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1995.Google Scholar
Vogler, Carolyn, and Pahl, Jan. 1994. “Money Power, and Inequality within Marriage.” Sociological Review 42 (05):263–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Weber, Max. 1958. “Class, Status, and Party.” In From Max Weber: Essays in Sociology, ed. Gerth, H. H. and Mills, C. Wright. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Welch, Susan. 1977. “Women as Political Animals? A Test of Some Explanations for Male-Female Political Participation Differences.” American Journal of Political Science 21 (11):711–31.Google Scholar
West, Candace, and Zimmerman, Don. 1987. “Doing Gender.” Gender and Society 1 (06):125–51.Google Scholar
Zick, Cathleen D., and McCullough, Jane L.. 1991. “Trends in Married Couples' Time Use: Evidence from 1977–78 and 1987–88.” Sex Roles 24 (04):459–87.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.