Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T22:26:46.029Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Psychological Nature of Political Structure

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Floyd H. Allport*
Affiliation:
Syracuse University

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Other
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1927

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 A more comprehensive outline of the relation between psychology and political science will be presented by the writer as a chapter in “The Inter-relations of the Social Sciences,” edited by W. F. Ogburn and A. Goldenweiser.

2 The entire situation necessary to render this act a “political” stimulus might be regarded, in terms of the modern Gestaltpsychologie as a “pattern” or “structure” which is necessary before any of its parts can have significance, and which is therefore in a sense more real than any of its parts. The behavioristic analysis which follows shows another way out of the difficulty.

3 The word “with” is here used in the sense with which we say a man lifts a stone “with” his hand.

4 The militaristic consequences of this fallacy have been discussed by the writer in an article entitled The Psychology of Nationalism”, Harper's Magazine, August, 1927 Google Scholar.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.