Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-dlnhk Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:07:13.453Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

POLI: An Expert System Model of U.S. Foreign Policy Belief Systems

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Charles S. Taber
Charles S. Taber
Affiliation:
State University of New York, Stony Brook
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

One of the more fruitful systematic approaches to the study of foreign policy views nations as information processors and explains foreign policy as a function of information and processing thereon. Much of such processing depends on the prior beliefs of decision makers, but for a variety of reasons these systems of prior beliefs are very difficult to analyze using “standard” empirical and modeling techniques. Computational modeling, including expert system technology, provides an alternative methodology that allows such analysis. I present Policy Arguer (POLI), an expert system model of U.S. foreign policy making in Asia. Poli has been very successful in reproducing actual U.S. responses to events in Asia from the 1950s. More important, POLI recreates policy debate in the form of the arguments and counterarguments used to justify policy alternatives. The model explains foreign policy outputs in terms of a complete process from foreign policy beliefs, through debate, to choice.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 86 , Issue 4 , December 1992 , pp. 888 - 904
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1992

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, Hayward R. Jr., 1984. “Historical Argumentation and Statistical Inference: Towards More Appropriate Logics for Historical Research.” Historical Methods 17:164–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., 1988. “The Dialectical Logic of Thucydides' Melian Dialogue.” American Political Science Review 82:805–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr.,, Bennett, James, and Mefford, Dwain. 1980. “Generalized Precedent Logics for Resolving Insecurity Dilemmas.” International Interactions 7:165–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., and Christensen, Cheryl. 1972. “From Causal Modeling to Artifidal Intelligence: The Evolution of a UN Peace-making Simulation.” In Experimentation and Simulation in Political Science, ed. LaPonce, J. A. and Smoker, Paul. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., and Greenberg, William J.. 1971. “The UN Charter: Alternative Pasts and Alternative Futures.” In The United Nations: Problems and Prospects, ed. Fedder, E. H.. St. Louis: University of Missouri Press.Google Scholar
Alker, Hayward R. Jr., and Greenberg, William J.. 1977. “On Simulating Collective Security Regime Alternatives.” In Thought and Action in Foreign Policy: Proceedings of the London Conference on Cognitive Process Models of Foreign Policy, March 1973, ed. Bonham, G. Matthew and Shapiro, Michael J.. Basel, West Germany: Birkhauser Verlag.Google Scholar
Allison, Graham T. 1971. Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Axelrod, Robert, ed. 1976. Structure of Decision: The Cognitive Maps of Political Elite. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Azar, Edward. 1972. Probe for Peace: Small State Hostilities. Minneapolis, MN: Burgess.Google Scholar
Bardes, Barbara, and Oldendick, Robert. 1978. “Beyond Internationalism: A Case for Multiple Dimensions in the Structure of Foreign Policy Attitudes.” Social Science Quarterly 13:127–46.Google Scholar
Benfer, Robert A., Brent, Edward E. Jr., and Furbee, Louanna. 1991. Expert Systems. Quantitative Applications in the Sodal Sdences, no. 77. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bennett, James P., and Alker, Hayward R. Jr., 1977. “When National Security Polides Breed Collective Insecurity: The War of the Padfic in a World Politics Simulation.” In Problems of World Modeling, ed. Deutsch, K. Fritsch, Jaguaribe, H., and Markovits, A.. Cambridge, MA: Ballinger.Google Scholar
Bennett, W. Lance. 1981. “Perception and Cognition: An Information Processing Framework for Politics.” In The Handbook of Political Behavior, vol. 1, ed. Long, Samuel L.. New York: Plenum.Google Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1956. The Image: Knowledge in Life and Society. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boulding, Kenneth E. 1959. “National Images and International Systems.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 3:120–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Boynton, G. Robert. 1987. “Historical Experience As a Source of Ideas in Committee Law Making: Incrementalism, Learning, and Planning.” Presented at the annual meeting of the Midwest Political Sdence Assoriation, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
Boynton, G. Robert. 1991. “When Senators and Publics Meet at the Environmental Protection Subcommittee.” Discourse and Society 3:131–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carbonell, Jaime G. Jr., 1978. “Politics: Automated Ideological Reasoning.” Cognitive Science 2:27–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carrico, Michael A., Girard, John E., and Jones, Jennifer P.. 1989. Building Knowledge Systems: Developing and Managing Rule-based Applications. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Cioffi-Revilla, Claudio. 1981. “Fuzzy Sets and Models of International Relations.” American Journal of Political Science 25:129–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Collins, Allan, and Smith, Edward E., eds. 1988. Readings in Cognitive Science: A Perspective from Psychology and Artificial Intelligence. San Mateo, CA: Morgan Kaufmann.Google Scholar
Cottam, Martha L. 1986. Foreign Policy Decision Making: The Influence of Cognition. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Crick, Frands. 1988. What Mad Pursuit: A Personal View of Scientific Discovery. New York: Basic.Google Scholar
Fitzsimmons, Barbara, Hoggard, Gary, McClelland, Charles, Martin, Wayne, and Young, Robert. 1969. World Event/Interaction Survey Handbook and Codebook. University of Southern California. Mimeo.Google Scholar
Foster, H. Schuyler. 1983. Activism Replaces Isolationism: U.S. Public Attitudes, 1940–1975. Washington: Foxhall.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1969. “The ‘Operational Code’: A Neglected Approach to the Study of Political Leaders and Dedsion-Making.” International Studies Quarterly 13:190–222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
George, Alexander L. 1979. “The Causal Nexus between Cognitive Beliefs and Dedsion-making Behavior:The ‘Operational Code' Belief System.” In Psychological Models of International Politics, ed. Falkowski, Lawrence S.. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
George, Alexander L., and Smoke, Richard. 1974. Deterrence in American Foreign Policy: Theory and Practice. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Glad, Betty. 1983. “Black-and-White Thinking: Ronald Reagan's Approach to Foreign Policy.” Political Psychology 4:33–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Glad, Betty, and Taber, Charles S.. 1991. “Images and Learning: The Dedsion To Use Force and the Domino Theory of the United States.” In Psychological Dimensions of War, ed. Glad, Betty. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Harrison, Selig S. 1978. The Widening Gulf: Asian Nationalism and American Policy. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Hermann, Charles F., and Coate, Roger A.. 1982. “Substantive Problem Areas.” In Describing Foreign Policy Behavior, ed. Callahan, Patrick, Brady, L. P., and Hermann, M. G.. Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1962. “The Belief System and National Images.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 16:244–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1967. “Cognitive Dynamics and Images of the Enemy: Dulles and Russia.” In Enemies in Politics, ed. Finlay, David, Holsti, Ole, and Fagan, Richard. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1977. “Foreign Policy Dedsion-Makers Viewed Psychologically: ‘Cognitive Process’ Models. In Thought and Action in Foreign Policy: Proceedings of the London Conference on Cognitive Process Models of Foreign Policy, March 1973, ed. Bonham, G. Mathew and Shapiro, Michael J.. Basel, West Germany: Birkhäuser Verlag.Google Scholar
Holsti, Ole R. 1979. “The Three Headed Eagle: The United States and System Change.” International Studies Quarterly 23:339–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hudson, Valerie. 1991. Artificial Intelligence and International Politics. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Janis, Irving L., and Mann, Leon. 1977. Decision-Making: A Psychological Analysis of Conflict, Choice, and Commitment. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1970. The Logic of Images in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Job, Brian L., and Johnson, Douglas. 1991. “Unclesam: The Application of a Rule-based Model of U.S. Foreign Policy Making.” In Artificial Intelligence and International Politics, ed. Hudson, Valerie M.. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
LaFeber, Walter. 1972. America, Russia, and the Cold War. 2d ed. New York: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
Leites, Nathan. 1951. The Operational Code of the Politburo. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Majeski, Stephen J. 1987. “A Recommendation Model of War Initiation: The Plausibility and Generalizability of General Cultural Rules.” In Artificial Intelligence and National Security, ed. Cimbala, Stephen. Lexington: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Martin, James, and Oxman, Steven. 1988. Building Expert Systems: A Tutorial. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
Mefford, Dwain. 1985. “Changes in Foreign Policy across Time: The Logical Analysis of a Succession of Decision Problems Using Logic Programming.” In Dynamic Models of International Conflict, ed. Luterbacher, Urs and Ward, Michael D.. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Mefford, Dwain. 1987. “Analogical Reasoning and the Definition of the Situation: Back to Snyder for Concepts and Forward to Artificial Intelligence for Method.” In New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, ed. Hermann, Charles F., Kegley, Charles W. Jr.,, and Rosenau, James N.. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Modigliani, André. 1972. “Hawks and Doves, Isolationism, and Political Distrust: An Analysis of Public Opinion on Military Policy.” American Political Science Review 66:960–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nathan, James A., and Oliver, James K.. 1985. United States Foreign Policy and World Order. 3d ed. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Negoita, Constantin V., and Ralescu, Dan. 1987. Simulation, Knowledge-based Computing, and Fuzzy Statistics. New York: Van Nostrand Reinhold.Google Scholar
Paige, Glenn. 1968. The Korean Decision. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Pool, Ithiel de Sola, and Kessler, Allen. 1969. “The Kaiser, the Tsar, and the Computer: Information Processing in a Crisis.” American Behavioral Scientist 8(9):31–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Charles A., Dyson, James W., and Purkitt, Helen E.. 1987. “Opening the ‘Black Box’: Cognitive Processing and Optimal Choice in Foreign Policy Decision Making.” In New Directions in the Study of Foreign Policy, ed. Hermann, Charles F., Kegley, Charles W. Jr.,, and Rosenau, James N.. Boston: Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Purkitt, Helen E., and Dyson, James W.. 1985. “Analyzing Global Systems: A Problem Solving Perspective and Some Suggested Applications.” Proceedings, Society for General Systems Research 1985:1077–85.Google Scholar
The Royal Institute of International Affairs. 1953–1977. Survey of International Affairs, 1950–1963. London: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Schank, Roger C., and Abelson, Robert P.. 1977. Scripts, Goals, Plans, and Understanding. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. 1985. “Adaptive Precedent-based Logic and Rational Choice: A Comparison of Two Approaches to the Modeling of International Behavior.” In Dynamic Models of International Conflict, ed. Luterbacher, Urs and Ward, Michael D.. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Schrodt, Philip A. 1991. “Artificial Intelligence and International Relations: An Overview.” In Artificial Intelligence and International Politics, ed. Hudson, Valerie M.. Boulder: Westview.Google Scholar
Seitz, Steven T. 1985. Methodology and the Social Sciences: Fuzzy Modelling for Comparative Social Inquiry. University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign. Typescript.Google Scholar
Seitz, Steven T. 1987. “AI Approaches to Superpower Rivalry: Bringing Intelligence Back In.” Presented at the annual meeting of the International Studies Association (Midwest), Lawrence, Kansas.Google Scholar
Shapiro, Stuart C., ed. 1990. Encyclopedia of Artificial Intelligence. New York: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
Sharpies, Mike, Hogg, David, Hutchison, Chris, Torrance, Steve, and Young, David. 1989. Computers and Thought: A Practical Introduction to Artificial Intelligence. Cambridge: Massachusetts Institute of Technology Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard C., Brack, H. W., and Sapin, Burton. 1962. Foreign Policy Decision-Making: An Approach to the Study of International Politics. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Richard C., and Paige, Glenn D.. 1962. “The United States Decision To Resist Aggression in Korea: The Application of an Analytical Scheme.” In Foreign Policy DecisionMaking: An Approach to the Study of International Politics, ed. Snyder, Richard C., Bruck, H. W., and Sapin, Burton. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Sylvan, Donald A., Goel, Ashok, and Chandrasekaran, B.. 1990. “Analyzing Political Decision Making from an Information Processing Perspective: Jesse.” American Journal of Political Science 34:1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Taber, Charles S. 1991. The Policy Arguer: A Computational Model of U.S. Foreign Policy Belief Systems in the 1950s. Ph.D. diss., University of Illinois, Urbana-Champaign.Google Scholar
Tanaka, Akihiko. 1984. “China, China Watching, and CHINA WATCHER.” In Foreign Policy Decision Making: Perception, Cognition, and Artificial Intelligence, ed. Sylvan, Donald A. and Chan, Steven. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Tetlock, Philip E. 1983. “Policy-makers' Images of International Conflict.” Journal of Social Issues 39:70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Thorson, Stuart J., and Sylvan, Donald A.. 1982. “Counterfactuals and the Cuban Missile Crisis.” International Studies Quarterly 26:539–71.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Truman, Harry S. 1956. Memoirs: Years of Trial and Hope. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Truman, Margaret. 1973. Harry S. Truman. New York: William Morrow.Google Scholar
Walker, Stephen G. 1983. “The Motivational Foundations of Political Belief Systems: A Re-analysis of the Operational Code Construct.” International Studies Quarterly 27:179–201.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whicker, Marcia Lynn, and Sigelman, Lee. 1991. Computer Simulation Applications: An Introduction. Applied Social Research Methods Series, vol. 25. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Zadeh, Lofti A. 1965. “Fuzzy Sets.” Information and Control 8:338–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.