Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-23T21:30:21.378Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Perceived Representativess and Voting: An Assessment of the Impact of “Choices” vs. “Echoes”

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 March 1985

John F. Zipp
John F. Zipp*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Extract

The persistent decline in voting in presidential elections since 1960 has resulted in serious scholarly attention being given to nonvoting. Despite the quality of these studies, however, the ratio of what we know about nonvoting to what we do not know is rather low. In the hopes of improving this situation, I advance the hypothesis that one reason that individuals do not vote is that their interests are not represented by any of the major candidates. To test this hypothesis, I used the SRC election studies (1968-1980) to construct measures of individuals' perceived distance from the major candidates on a variety of issues. Net of an extensive set of factors usually invoked to explain participation, increased distance from candidates significantly decreases the probability of voting. The implications of these results are discussed.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 79 , Issue 1 , March 1985 , pp. 50 - 61
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1985

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abramson, P. R., & Aldrich, J. H. The decline of electoral participation in America. American Political Science Review, 1982, 76, 502–521.10.1017/S0003055400188379CrossRefGoogle Scholar
American Political Science Association. Toward a more responsible two party system. New York: Rinehart, 1950.Google Scholar
Boyd, R. W. Decline of U.S. voter turnout: Structural explanations. American Politics Quarterly, 1981, 9, 133–159.10.1177/1532673X8100900201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brehm, J. W. Post-decisional changes in desirability of alternatives. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 1956, 52, 348–389.10.1037/h0041006CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brody, R. A. The puzzle of political participation in America. In King, A. (Ed.). The new American political system. Washington, D.C.: American Enterprise Institute, 1978.Google Scholar
Brody, R. A., & Page, B. I. Indifference, alienation, and rational decisions. Public Choice, 1973, 15, 1–17.10.1007/BF01718840CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Burnham, W. D. Party systems and the political process. In Chambers, W. N. & Burnham, W. D. (Eds.). The American party systems. New York: Oxford University Press, 1967.Google Scholar
Campbell, A. The passive citizen. Acta Sociologica, 1962, 1–2, 9–21.10.1177/000169936200600102CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A. Surge and decline: A study of electoral change. Public Opinion Quarterly, 1960, 24, 397–418.10.1086/266960CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. The American voter. New York: Wiley, 1960.Google Scholar
Cassel, C. A., & Hill, D. B. Explanations of voter decline: A multivariate test. American Politics Quarterly, 1981, 9, 181–195.10.1177/1532673X8100900203CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cavanagh, T. E. Changes in American voter turnout, 1946-1976. Political Science Quarterly, 1981, 96, 53–65.10.2307/2149676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Converse, P. E. The concept of a normal vote. In Converse, P. E., Campbell, A., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E.. Elections and the public order. New York: Wiley, 1966.Google Scholar
Converse, P. E. Non-voting among young adults in the United States. In Crotty, W. J., Freeman, D. M., & Gatlin, D. S. (Eds.). Political parties and political behavior. Boston: Allyn & Bacon, 1971.Google Scholar
Crawford, T. J. Theories of attitude changes. In Seidenberg, B. & Snadowsky, A. (Eds.). Social psychology. New York: Free Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Davis, O., Hinich, M., & Ordeshook, P. An expository development of a mathematical model of the electoral process. American Political Science Review, 1970, 64, 426–428.10.2307/1953842CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Downs, A. An economic theory of democracy. New York: Harper & Row, 1957.Google Scholar
Dwyer, J. H. Statistical models of the social and behavioral sciences. New York: Oxford University Press, 1983.Google Scholar
Hadley, A. T. The empty polling booth. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice-Hall, 1978.Google Scholar
Hamilton, R. F. Class and politics in the United States. New York: Wiley, 1972.Google Scholar
Hanushek, E. A., & Jackson, J. A. Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press, 1977.Google Scholar
Katosh, J. P., & Traugott, M. W. Costs and values in the calculus of voting. American Journal of Political Science, 1982, 2–6, 361–376.10.2307/2111044CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kelley, S. Jr., & Mirer, T. The simple act of voting. American Political Science Review, 1974, 68, 572–591.10.1017/S000305540011740XCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kimball, P. The disconnected. New York: Columbia University Press, 1972.Google Scholar
Ladd, E. C. Jr. Where have all the voters gone? New York: W. W. Norton, 1978.Google Scholar
Milbrath, L., & Goel, M. L. Political participation (2nd ed.). Chicago: Rand McNally, 1977.Google Scholar
Ordeshook, P. C. Extensions to a model of the electoral process and implications for the theory of responsible parties. Midwest Journal of Political Science, 1970, 14, 43–70.10.2307/2110392CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Page, B. I. Choices and echoes in presidential elections. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Parenti, M. Democracy for the few (3rd ed.). New York: St. Martin's Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Reiter, H. L. Why is turnout down? Public Opinion Quarterly, 1979, 43, 297–311.10.1086/268523CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Rokkan, S., & Valen, H. Parties, elections and political behavior in the northern countries. In Stammer, O. (Ed.), Politische Forschung. Koln-Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag, 1960.Google Scholar
Rosenstone, S. J., & Wolfinger, R. The effect of registration laws on voter turnout. American Political Science Review, 1978, 72, 22–45.10.2307/1953597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schaffer, S. D. A multivariate explanation of decreasing turnout in presidential elections, 1960-1976. American Journal of Political Science, 1981, 25, 68–95.10.2307/2110913CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarrance, L. The vanishing voter: A look at non-voting as a purposive act. In Moore, J. & Pierce, A. C. (Eds.). Voters, primaries and parties. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard Institute of Politics, 1976.Google Scholar
Verba, S., & Nie, N. H. Participation in America. New York: Harper & Row, 1972.Google Scholar
Verba, S., Nie, N. H., & Kim, J. Participation and political equality. New York: Cambridge University Press, 1976.Google Scholar
Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. J. Who votes? New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Zipp, J. F. Left-right dimensions of Canadian federal party identification: a discriminant analysis. Canadian Journal of Political Science, 1978, 251–277.10.1017/S0008423900041093CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipp, J. F., Landerman, R., & Luebke, P. Political parties and political participation: a reexamination of the “standard socioeconomic model.” Social Forces, 1982, 50, 1140–1153.10.2307/2577882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zipp, J. F., & Smith, J. A structural analysis of class voting. Social Forces, 1982, 60, 738–759.10.2307/2578390CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.