Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
The principal aim of this paper is to relate the normative structure of international law to the underlying patterns of political behavior that have characterized the modern state system. The political constraint upon the normative structure of the law is only one of many; there are also economic, social, and ethical constraints, among others. Nonetheless, it provides many insights into the changing substantive content of the law and also illustrates the way in which theory helps to provide an understanding of subject matter.
A systematic study of the structure of the international society has been attempted elsewhere by one of the authors. Two different models of international systems delineated there have particular relevance to the present topic. These are the “balance of power” system, a model of the international politics of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries, and the “loose bipolar” system, a model of present-day international politics. The two models, though no doubt less complex than the actual patterns of action, suffice to demonstrate important differences in system structure and behavior that can be related to normative standards.
1 See Kaplan, Morton A., System and Process in International Politics, John Wiley and Sons, 1957Google Scholar.
2 This story has been told in detail in Reitzel, William, Kaplan, Morton A., and Coblenz, Constance G., United States Foreign Policy: 1945–1955, Washington, The Brookings Institution, 1956Google Scholar.
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.