Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rcrh6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-04T09:37:48.523Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

The Origin of the Counter-Enlightenment: Rousseau and the New Religion of Sincerity

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Arthur M. Melzer*
Affiliation:
Michigan State University

Abstract

Rousseau inaugurated the counter-Enlightenment—that attack on secular rationalism and quest for “re-enchantment” that has, in one form or another, been with us ever since (and which, if the postmodern age has really arrived, now enjoys its heyday). The crowning expression of this event was Rousseau's effort to revive (while transforming) Christianity. Yet, paradoxically, it is also in Rousseau that the polemical core of the Enlightenment—the critique of Christianity—reached its fullest development. This strange co-presence of Enlightenment and counter-Enlightenment suggests an unsuspected continuity between the two. Rousseau, by pursuing more radically the underlying goal of the Enlightenment critique of Christianity—the restoration of human wholeness—was led to extend that very critique to Enlightenment rationalism itself and thence to propose a return to religion, but to one that, rooted in sincerity, would not only avoid the dangers of traditional Christianity but also better fulfill the Enlightenment's own humanistic goal.

Type
Articles
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1996

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Arendt, Hannah. 1963. On Revolution. New York: Viking Press.Google Scholar
Arkush, Allan. 1993. “Voltaire on Judaism and Christianity.” AJS Review 18 (2):223–43.Google Scholar
Barth, Karl. 1959. From Rousseau to Ritschl, trans. Cozens, Brian. London: SCM Press.Google Scholar
Bayle, Pierre. 1984. Pensées Diverses sur la Comète. Paris: Librairie Nizet.Google Scholar
Bréhier, Emile. 1938. “Les lectures malebranchistes de Jean-Jacques Rousseau.” Revue internationale de philosophie 1 (October):98142.Google Scholar
Burgelin, Pierre. 1962. Jean-Jacques Rousseau et la religion de Genève. Geneva: Editions Labor et Fides.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1954. The Question of Jean-Jacques Rousseau, trans. Gay, Peter. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Cassirer, Ernst. 1963. Rousseau, Kant, and Goethe, trans. Gutmann, J., Kristeller, P., and Randall, J. Jr.New York: Harper & Row.Google Scholar
Cotta, Sergio. 1965. “Théorie religieuse et théorie politique chez Rousseau.” In Rousseau et la philosophic politique. Paris: Presses Universitaires de France.Google Scholar
Derathé, R. 1948. “Jean-Jacques Rousseau et le Christianisme.” Revue de Métaphysique et de Morale 53:379414.Google Scholar
Gouhier, H. 1962. “Ce que le Vicaire doit à Descartes.” Annales de la Société Jean-Jacques Rousseau 35:139–54.Google Scholar
Grimsley, Ronald. 1968. Rousseau and the Religious Quest. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Groethuysen, Bernard. 1949. J.-J. Rousseau. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Helvétius, . 1989. De l'homme. Paris: Fayard.Google Scholar
Hendel, Charles. 1934. Jean-Jacques Rousseau: Moralist. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill.Google Scholar
Henrich, Dieter. 1992. Aesthetic Judgement and the Moral Image of the World. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1841. Behemoth. Vol. 6 of The English Works of Thomas Hobbes of Malmesbury, ed. Molesworth, William. London: John Bohn.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1962. Leviathan; or the Matter, Forme, and Power of a Commonwealth Ecclesiasticall and Civil, ed. Oakeshott, Michael. London: Collier-Macmillan.Google Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1972. De Cive. In Man and Citizen, ed. Gert, Bernard. Garden City, NY: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Holbach, Baron d'. 1971. “Le Christianisme dévoilé.” In Premières oeuvres. Paris: Editions Sociales.Google Scholar
Hulliung, Mark. 1994. The Autocritique of Enlightenment. Rousseau and the Philosophes. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Kraynak, Robert P. 1980. “John Locke: From Absolutism to Toleration.” American Political Science Review 74 (March):5369.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1876. “An Essay on Toleration.” In The Life of John Locke, ed. Bourne, H.R. Fox. London: Henry S. King.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1954. “Error,” “Sacerdos,” “Defence of Nonconformity.” In The Life and Letters of John Locke with extracts from his Journals and Common-place books, ed. King, Lord Peter. New York: Burt Franklin.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1967. Two Tracts on Government, ed. Abrams, Philip. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1983. A Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. Tully, James. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Löwith, Karl. 1964. From Hegel to Nietzsche: The Revolution in Nineteenth Century Thought, trans. Green, David E.. Garden City, NJ: Doubleday.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolo. 1950. The Discourses, trans. Walker, Leslie J.. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Maritain, Jacques. 1929. Three Reformers: Luther, Descartes, Rousseau. New York: Charles Scribner.Google Scholar
Marsilius of Padua. 1956. The Defender of Peace, trans. Gewirth, Alan. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Masson, P.-M. 1916. La Religion de J.-J. Rousseau. 3 vols. Paris: Librairie Hachette.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. 1968. The Political Philosophy of Rousseau. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Masters, Roger D. 1969. “Rousseau and the ‘Ilustrious Clarke.’” In Jean-Jacques Rousseau et son temps, ed. Launay, Michel. Paris: A.-G. Nizet.Google Scholar
Melzer, Arthur M. 1990. The Natural Goodness of Man: On the System of Rousseau's Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Joshua. 1993. Not By Reason Alone: Religion, History, and Identity in Early Modern Political Thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Montesquieu, . 1966. The Spirit of the Laws, trans. Cohler, Anne, Miller, Basia and Stone, Harold. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Nietzsche, Fredrich. 1966. Beyond Good and Evil, trans. Kaufmann, Walter. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Les Confessions de Jean-Jacques Rousseau. 19591969. In vol. 1 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Correspondance complète, ed. Leigh, R. A.. 1969. Geneva: Institut et Musée Voltaire.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Emile; or, On Education, trans. Bloom, Allan. 1979. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The First and Second Discourses, trans. Masters, Roger D. and Masters, Judith R.. 1964. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Jean-Jacques Rousseau Citoyen de Genève à Christophe de Beaumont, Archêveque de Paris. 19591969. In vol. 4 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Julie, Ou La Nouvelle Héloïse. 19591969. In vol. 2 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Letter to M. d'Alembert on the Theatre. 1969. In Politics and the Arts, trans. Bloom, Allan. Ithaca: Cornell University Press, Agora Editions.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettre à M. de Franquières. 19591969. In vol. 4 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Letter to Voltaire. 19901993. In vol. 3 of The Collected Writings of Rousseau, trans. Bush, Judith R., Kelly, Christopher and Masters, Roger. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Lettres Écrites de la Montagne. 19591969. In vol. 3 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Observations de J.-J. Rousseau, sur la Réponse à son Discours. 19591969. In vol. 3 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Oeuvres complètes. 19591969. 4 vols. Ed. Gagnebin, Bernard and Raymond, Marcel. Paris: Gallimard, Bibliothèque de la Pléïade.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. On the Social Contract with Geneva Manuscript and Political Economy, trans. Masters, Judith R., ed. Masters, Roger D.. 1978. New York: St. Martin's Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. The Reveries of the Solitary Walker, trans. Butterworth, Charles E.. 1979. New York: New York University Press.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. Rousseau Juge de Jean-Jacques. Dialogues. 19591969. In vol. 1 of Oeuvres complètes.Google Scholar
Rousseau, Jean-Jacques. “Three Fragments from Early Versions of the Discourse on Inequality.” 19901993. In vol. 3 of The Collected Writings of Rousseau, trans. Bush, Judith R., Kelly, Christopher and Masters, Roger. Hanover, NH: University Press of New England.Google Scholar
Schwartz, Joel. 1984. The Sexual Politics of Jean-Jacques Rousseau. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Scott, John. 1992. “The Theodicy of the Second Discourse: The ‘Pure State of Nature’ and Rousseau's Political Thought.” American Political Science Review 86 (September):696711.Google Scholar
Shklar, Judith N. 1969. Men and Citizens: A Study of Rousseau's Social Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Spink, J. S. 1960. French Free-Thought from Gassendi to Voltaire. London: Athlone Press.Google Scholar
Thomas, Jacques-François. 1956. Le Pélagianisme de J.J. Rousseau. Paris: Nizet.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . 1880. Histoire de l'établissement du christianisme. In vol. 31 of Oeuvres complètes. Paris: Garnier.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . 1962. Philosophical Dictionary, trans. Gay, Peter. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Voltaire, . 1980. Correspondence, ed. Besterman, Theodore. Paris: Gallimard.Google Scholar
Wade, Ira O. 1938. The Clandestine Organization and Diffusion of Philosophic Ideas in France from 1700 to 1750. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.