Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-rdxmf Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-30T15:08:07.580Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Organizing Political Life: What Administrative Reorganization Tells Us about Government

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James G. March  and
Johan P. Olson
James G. March
Affiliation:
Stanford University
Johan P. Olson
Affiliation:
University of Bergen, Norway
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

We examine the political history of twelve twentieth-century efforts at comprehensive administrative reorganization in the United States. These efforts account for only a small fraction of administrative changes and do not seem to have had a major impact on administrative costs, efficiency, or control. They have been a source of frustration for presidents and others and have become regular and unlamented casualties of experience. Nevertheless, the idea of comprehensive administrative reorganization has been persistently resurrected by the political system. The history of comprehensive reorganization suggests that short-run outcomes are heavily influenced by the problematics of attention; that influence over long-run administrative development involves affecting gradually evolving systems of meaning; and that reorganization rhetoric and ritual affirm an interpretation of life at least as much as they are bases for short-run political decisions. We suggest some implications of such conclusions for a more general understanding of the organization of political life.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 77 , Issue 2 , June 1983 , pp. 281 - 296
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1983

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Aikin, C., & Koenig, L. W.Introduction to Hoover Commission: a symposium. American Political Science Review, 1949, 43, 933–940.Google Scholar
Argyrades, D. C.Some aspects of civil service reorganization in Greece. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 1965, 31, 297–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. E.Reorganization and politics: a reflection on the adequacy of administration theory. Public Administration Review, 1914, 34, 205–211.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Arnold, P. E.The first Hoover Commission and the managerial presidency. Journal of Politics, 1976, 38, 46–70.Google Scholar
Arnold, P. E., & Roos, L. J.Toward a theory of congressional-executive relations. Review of Politics, 1974, 26, 410–429.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Beam, D. R.Public administration is alive and well and living in the White House. Public Administration Review, 1978, 38, 72–77.Google Scholar
Berg, C. L.Lapse of reorganization authority. Public Administration Review, 1975, 35, 195–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brademas, J.Federal reorganization and its likely impact on state and local government. Publius, 1978, 8, 25–37.Google Scholar
Brown, D. S.Reforming the bureaucracy: some suggestions for the new president. Public Administration Review, 1977, 37, 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brown, R. G.Reorganizing the national health service: a case study in administrative change. Oxford: Blackwell/Robertson, 1979.Google Scholar
Buck, A. E.The reorganization of state governments in the United States. New York: Columbia University Press, 1938.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Califano, J. A. Jr.Governing America: an insider's report from the White House and the cabinet. New York: Simon and Schuster, 1981.Google Scholar
Chapman, R. A., & Greenaway, J. R.The dynamics of administrative reform. London: Croom Helm, 1980.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.Religious revivalism and the administrative centralization movement. Administration and Society, 1977, 9, 219–232.Google Scholar
Cohen, M.D., & March, J. G.Leadership and ambiguity: the American college president. New York: McGraw-Hill, 1974.Google Scholar
Cohen, M. D., March, J. G., & Olsen, J. P.A garbage can model of organizational choice. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1972, 17, 1–25.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Coker, F. W.Dogmas of administrative reform as exemplified in the recent reorganization in Ohio. American Political Science Review, 1922, 16, 399–411.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Council of State Governments. Reorganizing state government. Chicago: Council of State Governments, 1950.Google Scholar
Coy, W.Basic problems. In Federal executive reorganization re-examined: a symposium. American Political Science Review, 1946, 40, 1124–1137.Google Scholar
Dahl, R. A.Introduction. In Jersey, J., Aspects of the presidency. New York: Ticknor and Fields, 1980.Google Scholar
Dempsey, J. R.Carter reorganization: a midterm appraisal. Public Administration Review, 1979, 39, 74–78.Google Scholar
Destler, A. M.Implementing reorganization. In Szanton, P. (Ed.), Federal reorganization: what have we: learned? Chatham, N.J.: Chatham House, 1981.Google Scholar
Dimock, M. E.The objectives of governmental reorganization. Public Administration Review, 1951, 11, 233–241.Google Scholar
Durham, G. H.An appraisal of the Hoover Commission approach to administrative reorganization in the national government. Western Political Quarterly, 1949, 2, 615–623.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Edelman, M.The symbolic uses of politics. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1964.Google Scholar
Emmerich, H.Federal organization and administrative management. University: University of Alabama Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Executive Office of the President (Nixon). Office of Management and Budget. Papers relating to the President's departmental reorganization program: a reference compilation. Revised 02 1972. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office.Google Scholar
Fain, T. G. (Ed.). Federal reorganization: the executive branch. New York: Bowker, 1977.Google Scholar
Fesler, J. W.Administrative literature and the second Hoover Commission reports. American Political Science Review, 1951, 51, 135–157.Google Scholar
Fesler, J. W.Public administration and the social sciences: 1946 to 1960. In Mosher, F. C. (Ed.), American public administration: past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Finer, H.The Hoover Commission reports. Political Science Quarterly, 1949, 64, Part I, pp. 405–419; Part II, pp. 579–595.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Fox, D. M. (Ed.). President Nixon's proposals for executive reorganization. Public Administration Review, 1974, 34, 487–495.Google Scholar
Garnett, J. L.Reorganizing state government: the executive branch. Boulder, Colo.: Westview Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Garnett, J. L., & Levine, C. H.State executive branch reorganization: patterns and perspectives. Administration and Society, 1980, 12, 227–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gorvine, A.Administrative reform: function of political and economic change. In Birkhead, G. S. (Ed.), Administrative problems in Pakistan. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Grafton, C.The reorganization of federal agencies. Administration and Society, 1979, 10, 437–464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Graham, G. A.Reorganization—a question of executive institutions. American Political Science Review, 1938, 32, 708–718.Google Scholar
Graves, W. B.Reorganization of the executive branch of the government of the United States: a compilation of basic information and significant documents, 1912-1948. Public Affairs Bulletin No. 66. Washington, D.C.: Library of Congress Legislative Reference Service, 1949.Google Scholar
Groves, R. T.Administrative reform and the politics of reform: the case of Venezuela. Public Administration Review, 1967, 27, 436–445.Google Scholar
Gulick, L.Science, values and public administration. In Gulick, L. and Urwick, L. (Eds.), Papers on the Science of Administration. New York: Institute of Public Administration, 1937.Google Scholar
Haider, D.Presidential management initiatives: a Ford legacy to executive management improvement. Public Administration Review, 1979, 39, 248–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hamilton, A., Jay, J., & Madison, J.The federalist papers. New York: Pocket Books, 1964 ed.Google Scholar
Harding, W. G.Business in government and the problem of governmental reorganization for greater efficiency. Academy of Political Science Proceedings, 1921, 9, 430–431.Google Scholar
Harris, J. P.The progress of administrative reorganization in the seventy-fifth Congress. American Political Science Review, 1937, 31, 862–870.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hart, J.The American presidency in action. New York: Macmillan, 1948.Google Scholar
Hawkins, R. B. Jr.Government reorganization: a federal interest. Publius, 1978, 8, 3–12.Google Scholar
Heady, F.A new approach to federal executive reorganization. American Political Science Review, 1947, 41, 1118–1126.Google Scholar
Heady, F.The reports of the Hoover Commission. Review of Politics, 1949a, 11, 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, F.The Reorganization Act of 1949. Public Administration Review, 1949b, 9, 165–174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heady, F.The operation of a mixed commission. American Political Science Review, 1949c, 43, 940–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Heineman, B. W. Jr., & Hessler, C. A.Memorandum for the president. New York: Random House, 1980.Google Scholar
Herring, E. P.Social forces and the reorganization of the federal bureaucracy. Southwestern Social Science Quarterly, 1934, 15, 185–200.Google Scholar
Hess, S.Organizing the presidency. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1976.Google Scholar
Hobbs, E. H.Executive reorganization in the national government. Oxford: University of Mississippi Press, 1953.Google Scholar
Holcombe, A. N.Administrative reorganization in the federal government. Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 1921, 95, 242–251.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hurt, P.Who should reorganize the national administration? American Political Science Review, 1932, 26, 1082–1098.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hyneman, C. S.Administrative reorganization. Journal of Politics, 1939, 1, 62–75.Google Scholar
Hyneman, C. S.Bureaucracy in a democracy. New York: Harper, 1950.Google Scholar
Johnson, N.Recent administrative reform in Britain. In Leemans, A. F. (Ed.), The management of change in government. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.Google Scholar
Joint Committee, U.S. Congress. House. Joint Committee on Reorganization of the Administrative Branch of the government. Report of the Joint Committee on Reorganization. 68th Congress, 1st session: Doc. no. 356. Washington, D.C.: Government Printing Office, 1924.Google Scholar
Karl, B. D.Executive reorganization and reform in the New Deal: the genesis of administrative management, 1900-1939. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1963.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H.Emerging conflicts in the doctrine of American public administration. American Political Science Review, 1956, 50, 1057–1073.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H.Politics and policies in state and local governments. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: PrenticeHall, Inc., 1963.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H.The limits of organizational change. University: University of Alabama Press, 1971.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H.Are government organizations immortal? Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1976.Google Scholar
Kaufman, H.Reflections on administrative reorganization. In Pechman, J. A. (Ed.), Setting national priorities: the 1978 budget. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1977.Google Scholar
Kingdon, J. W.An idea whose time has come: agendas, alternatives, and public policies. Boston: Little, Brown, 1983.Google Scholar
Kraines, O.Congress and the challenge of big government. New York: Bookman, 1958.Google Scholar
Kraines, O.The president versus Congress: the Keep Commission, 1905-1909, first comprehensive presidential inquiry into administration. Western Political Science Quarterly, 1970, 23, 5–54.Google Scholar
Laegereid, P. & Olsen, J. P.The storting—a last stronghold of the political amateur. Unpublished ms., University of Bergen, 1981.Google Scholar
La Follette, R. M. Jr.Systematizing congressional control. In Federal executive reorganization reexamined: a symposium, II. American Political Science Review, 1947, 41, 58–68.Google Scholar
Lance, B. Foreword in Fain, T. G. (Ed.), Federal reorganization: the executive branch. New York: Bowker, 1977.Google Scholar
Leemans, A. F. (Ed.). The management of change in government. The Hague: Martinus Nijhoff, 1976.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leibfried, S.The bureaucracy of the “statist reserve”: the case of the U.S.A. Ithaca, N.Y.: Cornell University, Western Societies Program: Occasional Papers No. 12, 1979.Google Scholar
Leiserson, A.Political limitations on executive reorganization. In Federal executive reorganization reexamined: a symposium, II. American Political Science Review, 1947, 41, 68–84.Google Scholar
Long, N.The local community as an ecology of games. American Journal of Sociology, 1958, 44, 251–261.Google Scholar
MacNeil, N. & Metz, H. W.The Hoover Report 1953-1955: what it means to you as a citizen and taxpayer. New York: Macmillan, 1956.Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. C.Federal executive reorganization: thirty years of experience. Public Administration Review, 1969, 29, 332–345.Google Scholar
Mansfield, H. C.Reorganizing the federai executive branch: limits of institutionalization. Law and Contemporary Problems, 1970, 35, 461–495.Google Scholar
March, J. G.How we talk and how we act: administrative theory and administrative life. Urbana, Ill.: Seventh David D. Henry Lecture, 1980.Google Scholar
March, J. G.Decisions in organizations and theories of choice. In de Ven, A. Van & Joyce, W. (Eds.), Perspectives on organization design and behavior. New York: Wiley, 1981a.Google Scholar
March, J. G.Footnotes to organizational change. Administrative Science Quarterly, 1981b, 17, 563–577.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P.Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Romelaer, P.Position and presence in the drift of decisions. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.). Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Sevon, G.Gossip, information and decision making. In Sproull, L. S. & Larkey, P. D. (Eds.), Advances in information processing in organizations, vol. 1. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI, 1983.Google Scholar
March, J. G. & Simon, H. A.Organizations. New York: Wiley, 1958.Google Scholar
Mayntz, R., & Scharpf, F.Policy-making in the German federal bureaucracy. Amsterdam: Elsevier, 1975.Google Scholar
Meier, K. J.Executive reorganization of government: impact on employment and expenditures. American Journal of Political Science, 1980, 24, 396–412.Google Scholar
Meriam, L., & Schmekebier, L. F.Reorganization of the national government: what does it involve? Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1939.Google Scholar
Meyer, J. W. & Rowan, B.Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 1977, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
Miles, R. E. Jr.Considerations for a president bent on reorganization. Public Administration Review, 1977, 37, 155–162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mill, J. S.Considerations on representative government. South Bend, Ind.: Gateway Editions, 1861 (1962).Google Scholar
Millett, J. D.Departmental management. American Political Science Review, 1949, 43, 959–966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Millett, J. D. & Rogers, L.The legislative veto and the Reorganization Act of 1939. Public Administration Review, 1941, 1, 176–189.Google Scholar
Moe, R. C.Executive branch reorganization: an over-view. Senate Committee on Governmental Affairs, Committee Print, 03, 1978.Google Scholar
Morgan, D. R. & Pelissero, J. P.Urban policy: does political structure matter? American Political Science Review, 1980, 74, 999–1006.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C.Some notes on reorganizations in public agencies. In Martin, R. C. (Ed.), Public administration and democracy. Syracuse, N.Y.: Syracuse University Press, 1965.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C. (Ed.). Government reorganization: cases and commentary. Indianapolis: Bobbs-Merrill, 1967.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C. (Ed.). American public administration: past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Mosher, F. C.et al.Watergate: implications for responsible government. New York: Basic Books, 1974.Google Scholar
Musicus, M.Reappraising reorganization. Public Administration Review, 1964, 24, 107–112.Google Scholar
Nathan, R. P.The plot that failed: Nixon and the administrative presidency. New York: Wiley, 1975.Google Scholar
Nathan, R. P.The administrative presidency. Public Interest, 1976, 44, 40–54.Google Scholar
Noll, R. G.Reforming regulation: an evaluation of the Ash Council proposals, a staff paper. Washington, D.C.: Brookings, 1971.Google Scholar
Olsen, J. P.Reorganization as a garbage can. In March, J. G. & Olsen, J. P. (Eds.), Ambiguity and choice in organizations. Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1976.Google Scholar
Ostrom, V.The intellectual crisis in American public administration. University: University of Alabama Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Pemberton, W. E.Bureaucratic politics: executive reorganization during the Truman administration. Columbia: University of Missouri Press, 1979.Google Scholar
Peters, T. J.Symbols, patterns and settings: an optimistic case for getting things done. Organizational Dynamics, 1978, 7, 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pfeffer, J.Management as symbolic action: the creation and maintenance of organizational paradigms. In Cummings, L. L. & Staw, B. M. (Eds.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 3. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI, 1981.Google Scholar
Pinkett, H. T.The Keep Commission, 1905-1909: A Rooseveltian effort for administrative reform. Journal of American History, 1965, 52, 297–312.Google Scholar
Polenberg, R.Reorganizing Roosevelt's government: the controversy over executive reorganization 1936-39. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1966.Google Scholar
Pondy, L. R.Leadership is a language game. In McCall, M. W. Jr., & Lombardo, M. M. (Eds.), Leadership. Durham, N. C.: Duke University Press, 1978.Google Scholar
President's Advisory Committee on Management. Improvement of management in the federal government. 1952 Reprinted in Public Administration Review, 1953, 13, 38–49.Google Scholar
President's Committee on Administrative Management (Brownlow Commission). Report of the President's Committee: Administrative management in the government of the United States. Washington, D.C.: U.S. Government Printing Office, 1937.Google Scholar
Price, D. K.1984 and beyond: social engineering or political values? In Mosher, F. C. (Ed.), American public administration: past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Redford, E. S.The value of the Hoover Commission reports to the educator. American Political Science Review, 1950, 44, 283–298.Google Scholar
Redford, E. S. & Blisset, M.Organizing the executive branch. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1981.Google Scholar
Roberts, C. (Ed.). Has the president too much power? New York: Harper's Magazine Press, 1973.Google Scholar
Rogers, L.Reorganization: post mortem notes. Political Science Quarterly, 1938, 53, 161–172.Google Scholar
Roness, P.Reorganisering av departementa. Eit politisk styringsmiddel? Bergen: Universitetsforlaget, 1979.Google Scholar
Rourke, F. E.The politics of administrative organization: a case history. Journal of Politics, 1957, 19, 461–478.Google Scholar
Sait, E. M.Political institutions—a preface. New York: Appleton-Century-Crofts, 1938.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M.The goals of reorganization. Administration and Society, 1981a, 12, 471–500.Google Scholar
Salamon, L. M.The question of goals. In Szanton, P. (Ed.), Federal reorganization: what have we learned? Chatham, N.J.: Chatham, 1981b.Google Scholar
Scher, S.The politics of agency organization. Western Political Quarterly, 1962, 15, 328–344.Google Scholar
Schick, A.The trauma of politics: public administration in the sixties. In Mosher, F. C. (Ed.), American public administration: past, present, future. University: University of Alabama Press, 1975.Google Scholar
Scott, W. R.Organizations: rational, natural, and open systems. Englewood Cliffs, N.J.: Prentice Hall, 1981.Google Scholar
Seidman, H. Remarks. In Fox, D. M. (Ed.), President Nixon's proposals for executive reorganization. Public Administration Review, 1974, 34, 487–495.Google Scholar
Seidman, H.Politics, position and power: the dynamics of federal organization, 3d ed. New York: Oxford University Press, 1980.Google Scholar
Short, L. M.The development of national administrative organization in the United States. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Short, L. M.Adjusting the departmental system. In Federal executive reorganization re-examined: a symposium, II. American Political Science Review, 1947, 41, 48–58.Google Scholar
Siegel, G. B. & Kleber, N.Formalism in Brazilian administrative reform. International Review of Administrative Sciences, 1965, 31, 175–184.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A.Administrative behavior: a study of decision-making processes in administrative organization. New York: Macmillan, 1957.Google Scholar
Simon, H. A., Smithburg, D. W., & Thompson, V. A.Public administration. New York: Alfred A. Knopf, 1950.Google Scholar
Sproull, L.Weiner, S., & Wolf, D.Organizing an anarchy. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1978.Google Scholar
Szanton, P. (Ed.). Federal reorganization: what have we learned? Chatham, N.J.: Chatham, 1981.Google Scholar
U.S. Commission on the Organization of the Executive Branch of the Government (Hoover Commission). Hoover Commission Report on the organization of the executive branch of the government. Reprint of the 1949 edition. Westport, Conn.: Greenwood, 1971.Google Scholar
Vickers, G.The art of judgment. New York: Basic Books, 1965.Google Scholar
Waldo, D.Organization theory: an elephantine problem. Public Administration Review, 1961, 21, 210–225.Google Scholar
Weber, G. A.Organized efforts for the improvement of methods of administration in the United States. New York: D. Appleton, 1919.Google Scholar
Weick, K. E.Cognitive processes in organization. In Staw, B. M. (Ed.), Research in organizational behavior, vol. 1. Greenwich, Conn.: JAI, 1979.Google Scholar
Weinberger, C. W.Government reorganization and public purpose. Publius, 1978, 8, 39–48.Google Scholar
White, L. D.The republican era. New York: Macmillan, 1958.Google Scholar
Willoughby, W. F.The reorganization of the administrative branch of the national government. Baltimore, Md.: Johns Hopkins Press, 1923.Google Scholar
Wolin, S.Politics and vision: continuity and innovation in western political thought. Boston: Little, Brown, 1960.Google Scholar
Woods, E. C.A proposed reorganization of the executive branch of the federal government. American Political Science Review, 1943, 37, 476–490.Google Scholar
Zink, H.Government reform in the United States of America. Political Quarterly, 1950, 21, 69–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zoffer, H. J.Introduction. In Kilman, R. H., Pondy, L. R., & Slevin, D.P.. The management of organizational design. Amsterdam: North Holland, 1976.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.