Hostname: page-component-7b9c58cd5d-wdhn8 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-03-14T21:24:46.443Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

[no title]

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Andrew Hacker
Andrew Hacker*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communication
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 57 , Issue 2 , June 1963 , pp. 431
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1963

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

* The exception ia Walter Berns, whose analysis of the voting studies shows a sophisticated understanding of this branch of research. Indeed, Berns deserves special commendation for ignoring the naive and irrelevant “theory of democracy” with which Berelson, Lazarsfeld, and McPhee ill-advisedly concluded Voting.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.