Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t8hqh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-03T20:43:26.007Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Nazi Vote: A National Ecological Study

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 June 1982

Courtney Brown
Courtney Brown*
Affiliation:
Washington University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Two models of voting are often used to explain the Nazi vote in the Weimar Republic. The first model states that the Nazis' electoral successes resulted from Protestant petty bourgeois and peasant support for fascism. The second model argues that the Nazis gained the bulk of their support from newly mobilized voters. Previous analyses of these models are plagued with serious problems due to their limited data base. This study reassesses these models with the use of an unusually complete data set for all of Germany and concludes that much of the previous work examining the Nazi vote wrongly identifies the Protestant petty bourgeoisie as the major contributor to the Nazi vote. The Nazis received important levels of support from Protestant peasants, new voters, and Catholic petty bourgeoisie.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 2 , June 1982 , pp. 285 - 302
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alker, Hayward R. Jr. 1974. A typology of ecological fallacies. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokkan, Stein (eds.). Social ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Allardt, Erik. 1974. Aggregate analysis: the problem of its informative value. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokken, Stein (eds.). Social ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Blalock, Hubert M. Jr. 1964. Causal inferences in nonexperimental research. New York: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Boyd, Lawrence H. Jr. and Iversen, Gudmund R. 1979. Contextual analysis: concepts and statistical techniques. Belmont, Calif.: Wadsworth.Google Scholar
Farquaharson, J. E. 1976. The plough and the swastika: The NSDAP and the agriculture in Germany 1928–1945. Beverly Hills, Calif.: Sage.Google Scholar
Friedrich, Carl Joachim. 1937. The agricultural basis of emotional nationalism. The Public Opinion Quarterly. 1:50–61.10.1086/265061CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Goodman, Leo A. 1959. Some alternatives to ecological correlation. American Journal of Sociology. 64:610–25.10.1086/222597CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grunberger, Richard. 1971. A social history of the Third Reich. London: Weidenfeld and Nicolson.Google Scholar
Hanushek, Eric A. and Jackson, John E. 1977. Statistical methods for social scientists. New York: Academic Press.Google Scholar
Heberle, Rudolf. 1945. From democracy to Nazism: a regional case study on political parties in Germany. New York: Grosset and Dunlap.Google Scholar
Hitler, Adolf. 1943. Mein Kampf. Translated by Ralph Mannheim. Boston: Houghton Mifflin Co.Google Scholar
Kosok, Paul. 1933. Modern Germany: a study of conflicting loyalties. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Lepsius, M. Rainer. 1978. From fragmented party democracy to government by emergency decree and national socialist takeover. In Linz, Juan J., and Stepan, Alfred (eds.). The breakdown of democratic regimes: Europe. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
Linz, Juan J. 1978. Some notes toward a comparative study of fascism in sociological historical perspective. In Laqueur, Walter (ed.). Fascism: a reader's guide. Berkeley, Calif.: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Lipset, Seymour Martin. 1963. Political man: the social bases of politics. New York: Anchor.Google Scholar
Loomis, Charles P., and Beegle, J. Allan. 1946. The spread of German Nazism in rural areas. American Sociological Review. 2:724–34.10.2307/2087068CrossRefGoogle Scholar
McKibbin, R. I. 1969. The myth of the unemployed: who did vote for the Nazis? Australian Journal of Politics and History. 15:25–40.10.1111/j.1467-8497.1969.tb00946.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
O'Lessker, Karl. 1968. Who voted for Hitler? a new look at the class bases of Nazism. American Journal of Sociology. 74:63–9.10.1086/224585CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Pratt, Samuel. The social basis of Nazism and communism in urban Germany. Masters' thesis, Michigan State College, 1948.Google Scholar
Robinson, William S. 1950. Ecological correlations and the behavior of individuals. American Sociological Review. 15:351–57.10.2307/2087176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scheele, Godfrey. 1946. The Weimar Republic: overture to the Third Reich. London: Faber and Faber.Google Scholar
Shively, W. Phillips. 1972. Voting sensibility and the nature of party attachments in the Weimar Republic. American Political Science Review. 66:1203–25.10.2307/1957174CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Theil, H. 1970. On the estimation of relationships involving qualitative variables. American Journal of Sociology. 76:103–154.10.1086/224909CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Valkonen, Tapani. 1969. Individual and structural effects in ecological research. In Dogan, Mattei and Rokken, Stein (eds.). Social ecology. Cambridge, Mass.: M.I.T. Press.Google Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. Jr. 1976. Linear models for evaluating conditional relationships. American Journal of Political Science. 20:349–373.10.2307/2110649CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.