Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Much has been written on the origin, development, and characteristics of representative government; and in recent years there has been a revival of interest in this subject, and a further analysis of the evidence and criticism of views formerly accepted. In this extensive literature, considerable attention has been given to the nature of political representation and representative government, and to the relation between the representative and his constituents, with important differences in the definitions and meanings ascribed to these terms. Many writers have assumed that their views on these matters are the only correct statements; but some of the more recent writers have recognized, to some extent, the need for a closer analysis of the different senses in which these terms may be employed. An examination of different views may be of service in leading to a clearer understanding of the problems involved.
Etymologically, the literal meaning of represent is to “present again,” and from this it has come to mean to appear in place of another. In this secondary sense, a representative has been defined as “an agent, deputy, or substitute, who supplies the place of another or others.”
1 Beard, C. A., “The Teutonic Origins of Representative Government,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 26, pp. 28, 223 (1932)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; The Cambridge Ancient History; The Cambridge Medieval History; The Cambridge Modern History; Carlyle, R. W. and Carlyle, A. J., A History of Medieval Political Theory, V, Chap. 9Google Scholar; VI, Pt. II, Chap. 6; Chapot, V., The Roman World (1928), Chap. 10Google Scholar; Clarke, Maude V., Medieval Representation and Consent (1936)Google Scholar; Hardy, E. H., “The Provincial Concilia from Augustus to Diocletian,” in Studies in Roman History (1908)Google Scholar; Hefele, et Hergenrother, , Histoire des Conciles (1907 ff.)Google Scholar; Lapsley, Gaillard, “Some Recent Advances in English Constitutional History,” Cambridge Historical Journal, Vol. 5, p. 191 (1936)CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Larson, J. A. O., “Representative Government in the Pan-Hellenic Leagues,” Classical Philology, Vols. 20, 21, pp. 213, 52 (1925–1926)Google Scholar; Merriman, R. B., “The Cortes of the Spanish Kingdoms in the Later Middle Ages,” American Historical Review, Vol. 16, p. 495 Google Scholar; Percival, H. B., The Ecumenical Councils (1900)Google Scholar; Sait, E. M., Political Institutions (1938), Chap. 20Google Scholar; Tenney, Frank, “Representative Government in the Macedonian Republics,” Classical Philology, Vol. 9, p. 49 (1914)Google Scholar; “Representative Government in Ancient Polities,” Classical Journal, Vol. 14, p. 533 (1919); Weske, Dorothy B., Convocations of the Clergy (1937).Google Scholar
2 Treatises and case books on the law of agency; Judicial and Statutory Definitions of Words and Phrases; Luepp, F. E., “Do Our Representatives Represent?”, Atlantic Monthly, Vol. 114, p. 433 (1914)Google Scholar, noting differences in the position of attorneys, diplomatic envoys, guardians, and proxies.
3 Holden, Alice M., “Imperative Mandate in the Spanish Cortes of the Middle Ages,” American Political Science Review, Vol. 24, p. 886 (1930).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
4 Hallam, , Constitutional History of England (1865 ed.), I, p. 265.Google Scholar The act requiring local residence was not repealed until 1774. Anson, , Law and Custom of the Constitution (3rd ed., 1897), Pt. I, p. 90.Google Scholar
5 Quoted in Luce, R., Legislative Principles, p. 35.Google Scholar
6 Murray's Oxford Dictionary.
7 Gibbons, P. A., Ideas of Political Representation in Parliament, 1660–1882 (1914).Google Scholar
8 The Social Contract, Chap. 5. In his later and more specific proposals for the governments of Corsica, Geneva, and Poland, Rousseau provided for the election of representative agencies.
9 Works (1839 ed.), I, pp. 71, 334–5; II, p. 12; III, p. 521; IV, p. 372.
10 Constitutional Code, p. 44.
11 Considerations on the French Revolution, Pt. I, Chap. 17. Quoted in Bailey, The Rationale of Political Representation.
12 M. Farrand, Records of the Federal Convention, quoted in Carpenter, N. S., Democracy and Representation (1925), No. 2.Google Scholar
13 The Federalist, No. 35.
14 P. 143.
15 Use and Abuse of Political Terms (1832).
16 Political Philosophy, Pt. I, Chap. 2; Pt. III, Chaps. 6, 11; “ The British Constitution, Works, XI, p. 35 ff.Google Scholar
17 Representative Government in Europe, Pt. I, Lectures 6–8.
18 Representative Government, Chaps. 5, 12.
19 Allgemeines Staatsrecht, pp. 54–55.
20 Political Science (1886), I, pp. 294–295.
21 Works (1885–8), II, p. 170.
22 The Elements of Politics (1891, 1897), Chap. 20, pp. 371–378.
23 Ibid., pp. 616–617.
24 Introduction to Political Science (1896), p. 350.
25 Political Science Quarterly, Vol. 11, p. 640 (1886).
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.