Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-hc48f Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T08:06:40.641Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Mass Opposition to the Soviet Putsch of August 1991: Collective Action, Rational Choice, and Democratic Values in the Former Soviet Union

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

James L. Gibson
James L. Gibson*
Affiliation:
University of Houston
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

The attempted coup in August 1991 provides an acid test of whether a democratic political culture is emerging in the former Soviet Union. This paper considers the hypothesis that active resistance to the coup was partly a function of attachments to democracy. Relying heavily on earlier models of collective action, and based on a 1992 survey of mass opinion in all the republics, this hypothesis is tested within a broader theory of rational choice and expectancy theory. Generally, it seems that reactions to the coup were not based on strictly rational calculations and that basic commitments to the collective good of democracy motivated resistance. My general conclusion is that a mass culture has emerged in Russia that nurtures democracy. The 1991 coup demonstrates that for many people in the former Soviet states there is little alternative to democratic politics.

Type
Research Note
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 91 , Issue 3 , September 1997 , pp. 671 - 684
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1997

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Barnes, Samuel H., and Kaase, Max, et al. 1979. Political Action: Mass Participation in Five Western Democracies. Beverly Hills, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1971. Polyarchy. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dahl, Robert A. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Dalton, Russell J. 1994. “Communists and Democrats: Democratic Attitudes in the Two Germanies.” British-Journal of Political Science 24(10):469–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dobson, Richard B., and Grant, Steven A.. 1992. “Public Opinion and the Transformation of the Soviet Union.” International Journal of Public Opinion Research 4(Winter):302–20.Google Scholar
Dunlop, John B. 1993. The Rise of Russia and the Fall of the Soviet Empire. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Finifter, Ada W., and Mickiewicz, Ellen. 1992. “Redefining the Political System of the USSR: Mass Support for Political Change.” American Political Science Review 86(12):857–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Finkel, Steven E., Muller, Edward N., and Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1989. “Personal Influence, Collective Rationality, and Mass Political Action.” American Political Science Review 83(09):885–903.Google Scholar
Fleron, Frederic J. Jr. 1996. “Post-Soviet Political Culture in Russia: An Assessment of Recent Empirical Investigations.” Europe-Asia Studies 48(03):225–60.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1993a. “Political Freedom, Social Networks, and Atomization in the Contemporary (Former) Soviet Union.” Presented at the Annual Meeting of the Western Political Science Association, 03, 1993, Pasadena, California.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1993b. “Perceived Political Freedom in the Soviet Union.” Journal of Politics 55:(11):936–74.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1995. “The Resilience of Mass Support for Democratic Institutions and Processes in the Nascent Russian and Ukrainian Democracies.” In Political Culture and Civil Society in Russia and the New States of Eurasia, ed. Tismaneanu, Vladimir. Armonk, NY: M. E. Sharp, 1995. Pp. 53–111.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1996. “‘A Mile Wide But an Inch Deep’ (?): The Structure of Democratic Commitments in the Former USSR.” American Journal of Political Science 40(05):396–420.Google Scholar
Gibson, James L. 1997. “The Struggle between Order and Liberty in Contemporary Russian Political Culture.” Australian Journal of Political Science 32(07):forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gibson, James L., and Duch, Raymond M.. 1990. Survey of Soviet Values, 1990 [computer file]. Institute of Sociology, USSR Academy of Sciences [producer], 1990. Ann Arbor, MI: Inter-university Consortium for Political and Social Research [distributor], 1994.Google Scholar
Gorbachev, Mikhail. 1991. The August Coup: The Truth and Lessons. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
Greenfeld, Liah. 1992. Nationalisms: Five Roads to Modernity. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Grey, Robert D., Miller, William L., White, Stephen, and Heywood, Paul. 1995. “The Structure of Russian Public Opinion.” Coexistence 32(09):183–215.Google Scholar
Hellie, Richard. 1991. “Russia Before, During, and After the ‘Keystone Coup.’” Russian History/Histoire Russe 18(3):255–315.Google Scholar
Kaase, Max. 1989. “Mass Participation.” In Continuities in Political Action: A Longitudinal Study of Political Orientations in Three Western Democracies, ed. Jennings, M. Kent, van Deth, Jan W., et al.Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.Google Scholar
Klandermans, Bert. 1984. “Mobilization and Participation: Social-Psychological Expansions of Resource Mobilization Theory.” American Sociological Review 49(10):583–600.Google Scholar
Knoke, David. 1990. “Networks of Political Action: Toward Theory Construction.” Social Forces 68(06):1041–63.Google Scholar
Lapidus, Gail W. 1989. “State and Society: Toward the Emergence of Civil Society in the Soviet Union.” In Politics, Society, and Nationality Inside Gorbachev's Russia, ed. Bialer, Seweryn. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.Google Scholar
Muller, Edward N., Dietz, Henry A., and Finkel, Steven E.. 1991. “Discontent and the Expected Utility of Rebellion: The Case of Peru.” American Political Science Review 85(12):1261–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Obolonsky, A. V. 1995. “Russian Politics in the Time of Troubles: Some Basic Antinomies.” In Russia in Search of its Future, ed. Saikal, Amin and Maley, William. New York: Cambridge University Press. Pp. 13–27.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1990. “Postmaterialism, Collective Action, and Political Protest.” American Journal of Political Science 34(02):212–35.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter. 1994. “Repression and Revolutionary Action: East Germany in 1985.” Rationality and Society 6(01):101–38.Google Scholar
Opp, Karl-Dieter, and Gern, Christiane. 1993. “Dissident Groups, Personal Networks, and Spontaneous Cooperation: The East German Revolution of 1989.” American Sociological Review 58 (10):659–80.Google Scholar
Remnick, David. 1993. Lenin's Tomb: The Last Days of the Soviet Empire. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Sergeyev, Victor, and Biryukov, Nikolai. 1993. Russia's Road to Democracy: Parliament, Communism and Traditional Culture. Brookfield, VT: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
Sivacek, John, and Crano, William D.. 1982. “Vested Interest as a Moderator of Attitude-Behavior Consistency.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 43(08):210–21.Google Scholar
Snow, David A., Zurcher, Louis A. Jr., and Ekland-Olson, Sheldon. 1980. “Social Networks and Social Movements: A Microstructural Approach to Differential Recruitment.” American Sociological Review 45(10):787–801.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Walsh, Edward J., and Warland, Rex H.. 1983. “Social Movement Involvement in the Wake of a Nuclear Accident: Activists and Free Riders in the TMI Area.” American Sociological Review 48 (12):764–80.Google Scholar
Whitefield, Stephen, and Evans, Geoffrey. 1994. “The Russian Election of 1993: Public Opinion and the Transition Experience.” Post-Soviet Affairs 10(01-March):38–60.Google Scholar
Wyman, Matthew. 1994. “Russian Political Culture: Evidence from Public Opinion Surveys.” The Journal of Communist Studies and Transition Politics 10(03):25–54.Google Scholar
Yeltsin, Boris. 1994. The Struggle for Russia. Trans. Fitzpatrick, Catherine A.. New York: Times Books.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.