Hostname: page-component-745bb68f8f-5r2nc Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-01-12T01:46:50.013Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

A Legislative Council for Michigan

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Harold M. Dorr
Harold M. Dorr
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. Please use the Get access link above for information on how to access this content.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Legislative Notes and Reviews
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 28 , Issue 2 , April 1934 , pp. 270 - 275
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1934

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

1 Michigan Public Acts, 1933, No. 206; Enroll. No. 153, I. E. BUI No. 663.

2 Ibid., sec. 2.

3 Ibid., sec. 4.

4 Ibid., sec. 5.

5 Under this provision the council retains its official character during special sessions. Some ill-feeling was engendered when the council presumed to continue its activities during the first special session of the present legislature.

6 Still further sub-committees have been created to study basic problems in state government and are not expected to report to the present legislature.

7 Reports from several other committees have been accepted by the council and their recommendations were before the legislature for consideration in the second special session, called for February 19.

8 This procedure, including the drafting of bills, has been followed uniformly by sub-committees and the council in submitting recommendations.

9 Serious differences arose over the composition of the liquor control commission. The council and the administration clashed on the issues involved in the governor's “insurrection” bond proposal, and the unwillingness of either to give way to the other defeated the measure in the first special session.

10 Detroit Free Press, Dec. 17, 1933.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.