Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-2brh9 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-02T19:17:21.156Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Interpreting the 1974 Congressional Election

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Eric M. Uslaner ,
M. Margaret Conway ,
Gary C. Jacobson  and
Samuel Kernell
Eric M. Uslaner
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
M. Margaret Conway
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park
Gary C. Jacobson
Affiliation:
University of California, San Diego
Samuel Kernell
Affiliation:
The Brookings Institution, Washington, D.C.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

What factors best account for the 1974 congressional election results? Were the Democratic party gains in House seats due mainly to the behavior of “strategic politicians” who sought or accepted candidacies and raised effective campaign war chests? Or were the Democratic gains due more to the impact of Watergate and the economy on voters' choices? In this Controversy, Gary C. Jacobson and Samuel Kernell defend the “strategic politicians” thesis, while Eric Uslaner and Margaret Conway stand by their more conventional accounting of the 1974 election outcome.

Type
Controversy
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 80 , Issue 2 , June 1986 , pp. 591 - 595
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1986

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Brody, Richard A. 1977. Stability and Change in Party Identification. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1985a. Money and Votes Reconsidered: Congressional Elections, 1972–1982. Public Choice, 47:7–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C. 1985b. Enough is Too Much: Money and Competition in House Elections, 1972–1984. Presented at the Thomas P. O'Neill, Jr. Symposium on Elections in America, Boston, MA.Google Scholar
Jacobson, Gary C., and Kernell, Samuel. 1983. Strategy and Choice in Congressional Elections, 2d ed. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Ragsdale, Lyn, and Cook, Timothy. 1984. Representatives' Actions and Challengers' Reactions: Limits to Candidate Connections in the House. Presented at the annual meeting of the American Political Science Association, Washington, D.C.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M., and Conway, M. Margaret. 1985. The Responsible Congressional Electorate: Watergate, the Economy, and Vote Choice in 1974. American Political Science Review, 79:788–803.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.