Hostname: page-component-7bb8b95d7b-l4ctd Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-09-06T10:19:10.666Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Individual Political Economy of Federal Tax Policy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Michael R. Hawthorne  and
John E. Jackson
Michael R. Hawthorne
Affiliation:
Grinnell College
John E. Jackson
Affiliation:
University of Michigan
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Public policies are the product of conflicting demands within society. These demands are both collective in nature and the product of individual interests. Individuals must balance these conflicting interests in developing their policy preferences. We estimate the role of collective and individual interests in preference formation, using tax policy as a substantive example. Survey data are used to estimate the model for evaluations of several tax policies debated during consideration of the 1978 Tax Revenue Act. Our analysis indicates that individual preferences for tax policies are greatly affected by attitudes towards collective issues—particularly redistribution attitudes—and by self-interest considerations. We also find that aggregate variables measuring individuals' local economies have significant effects on symbolic and self-interest preferences.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 81 , Issue 3 , September 1987 , pp. 757 - 774
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1987

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Davis, Otto A., and Jackson, John E. 1974. Senate Defeat of the Family Assistance Plan. Public Policy 22:245–74.Google Scholar
Franklin, Charles H., and Jackson, John E. 1986. Structural Estimation with Limited Variables. In Political Science: The Science of Politics, ed. Weisberg, Herbert F. New York: Agathon.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1979. Statistical Estimation of Possible Response Bias in Close-Ended Issue Questions. Political Methodology 6:393–423.Google Scholar
Jackson, John E. 1983. The Systematic Beliefs of the Mass Public: Estimating Policy Preferences with Survey Data. Journal of Politics 45:840–865.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A. 1959. The Theory of Public Finance. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Musgrave, Richard A., and Musgrave, Peggy B. 1976. Public Finance in Theory and Practice. 2d ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
Proceedings of a Conference on Tax and Expenditure Limitations. 1979. National Tax Journal 32(2), June.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., and Citrin, Jack. 1983. The Tax Revolt. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Sears, David O., Lau, R. R., Tyler, T. R., and Allen, H. M. Jr. 1980. Self-interest versus Symbolic Politics in Policy Attitudes and Presidential Voting. American Political Science Review 74: 670–84.Google Scholar
Thurow, Lester. 1971. The Income Distribution as a Pure Public Good. Quarterly Journal of Economics 85:327–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wright, Gerald C. Jr. 1977. Contextual Models of Electoral Behavior: The Southern Wallace Vote. American Political Science Retriew 71:497–508.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.