Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7fkt Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T08:27:20.077Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

The Historical Origins of Territorial Disputes

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 December 2016

SCOTT F. ABRAMSON  and
DAVID B. CARTER
SCOTT F. ABRAMSON*
Affiliation:
University of Rochester
DAVID B. CARTER*
Affiliation:
Princeton University
*
Scott F Abramson is Assistant Professor, Department of Political Science, University of Rochester, Rochester, NY 14627-0146 ([email protected]).
David B. Carter is Assistant Professor, Corwin Hall 33, Department of Politics, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ 08544 ([email protected]).
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Given the abundance of evidence that disputed territory matters, we know remarkably little about the origins of territorial claims. We argue that the presence of competing historical border precedents is central to the emergence of territorial claims. We outline why precedents provide opportunity to make claims and provide two possible explanations for why leaders have incentive to claim along precedents. One possibility is consistent with the conventional wisdom that incentive derives from territorial characteristics such as natural resources or strategic significance. A second and more novel explanation is that the persistent coordination effects of historical boundaries provide the incentive to draw claims along them. We use new data on the location of historical boundaries from the peace of Westphalia until the start of the French Revolution to show that historical border precedents drive the emergence of territorial claims after the Congress of Vienna and that persistent coordination effects provide incentive to dispute historical precedents.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 110 , Issue 4 , November 2016 , pp. 675 - 698
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

REFERENCES

Abramson, Scott F. 2016. “The Economic Origins of the Territorial State.” International Organization. Forthcoming.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Acemoglu, D., Johnson, S., and Robinson, J. A.. 2002. “Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution.” Quarterly Journal of Economics 117 (4): 1231–94.Google Scholar
Aleprete, Michael E. Jr., and Hoffman, Aaron M.. 2012. “The Strategic Development of Border Areas: Explaining Variation in Interaction Opportunity Across Land Borders.” International Interactions 38 (1): 1–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Allen, William Edward David. 2014. The Ukraine. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Altonji, Joseph G., Elder, Todd E., and Taber, Christopher R.. 2005. “Selection on Observed and Unobserved Variables: Assessing the Effectiveness of Catholic Schools.” Journal of Political Economy 113 (1): 151–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Anderson, Benedict R. 1991. Imagined Communities: Reflections on the Origin and Spread of Nationalism. New York: Verso.Google Scholar
Bairoch, P., Batou, J. and Pierre, C.. 1988. Population des Villes Européennes de 800 à 1850: Banque de Données et Analyse Sommaire des Résultats (la). Paris, France: Librairie Droz.Google Scholar
Biggs, Michael. 1999. “Putting the State on the Map: Cartography, Territory, and European State Formation.” Comparative Studies in Society and History 41 (2): 374–405.Google Scholar
Blaydes, Lisa, and Chaney, Eric. 2012. “The Feudal Revolution and Europes Rise: Political Divergence of the Christian West and the Muslim World before 1500 CE.” American Political Science Review 107 (1): 16–34.Google Scholar
Boggs, S. Whittemore. 1940. International Boundaries: A Study of Boundary Functions and Problems. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Braithwaite, Alex. 2010. “MIDLOC: Introducing the Militarized Interstate Dispute (MID) Location Dataset.” Journal of Peace Research 47 (1): 91–8.Google Scholar
Branch, Jordan. 2014. The Cartographic State: Maps, Territory, and the Origins of Sovereignty. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Bryce, James. 1920. The Holy Roman Empire. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Burghardt, Andrew F. 1973. “The Bases of Territorial Claims.” Geographical Review 63 (2): 225–45.Google Scholar
Carter, David B. 2010. “The Strategy of Territorial Conflict.” American Journal of Political Science 54 (4): 969–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B. 2016. “History as a Double-Edged Sword: Historical Boundaries and Territorial Claims.” Politics, Philosophy & Economics. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Carter, David B., and Goemans, H. E.. 2011. “The Making of the Territorial Order: New Borders and the Emergence of Interstate Conflict.” International Organization 65 (2): 275–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B., and Goemans, H. E.. 2014. “The Temporal Dynamics of New International Borders.” Conflict Management and Peace Science 31 (3): 285–302.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Carter, David B., and Goemans, H. E.. 2015. “International Trade and Coordination: Tracing Border Effects.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Chanda, A., and Putterman, L.. 2007. “Early Starts, Reversals and Catch-up in the Process of Economic Development.” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics 109 (2): 387–413.Google Scholar
Chang, Pao-min. 1985. The Sino-Vietnamese Territorial Dispute. New York: Praeger.Google Scholar
Chen, King C. 1987. China’s War With Vietnam, 1979. Stanford, CA: Hoover Institution Press.Google Scholar
Darden, Keith A. 2013. Resisting Occupation: Mass Schooling and the Creation of Durable National Loyalties. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Davies, Norman. 1972. “White Eagle, Red Star: The Polish-Soviet War, 1919–20.” London, UK: Macdonald and Co.Google Scholar
Day, Alan J. 1987. Border and Territorial Disputes, 2nd ed. Essex, UK: Longman.Google Scholar
Deutsch, Karl Wolfgang. 1953. Nationalism and Social Communication: An Inquiry into the Foundations of Nationality. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
Dincecco, Mark. 2011. Political Transformations and Public Finances: Europe, 1650–1913. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Dincecco, Mark, Federico, Giovanni, and Vindigni, Andrea. 2011. “Warfare, Taxation, and Political Change: Evidence from the Italian Risorgimento.” The Journal of Economic History 71 (04): 887–914.Google Scholar
Downing, Brian M. 1992. The Military Revolution and Political Change. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Duiker, William J. 1986. China and Vietnam: The Roots of Conflict. Berkeley, CA: Institute of East Asian Studies.Google Scholar
Dziewanowski, M. K. 1969. “Joseph Piłsudski a European Federalist 1918–1922.” Stanford, CA: Hoover institution Press.Google Scholar
FAO, IIASA. 2000. “Global Agro-Ecological Zones (GAEZ).” http://gaez.fao.org/Main.html. Accessed July 23, 2016.Google Scholar
Gavrilis, George. 2008. The Dynamics of Interstate Boundaries. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gibler, Douglas M. 2012. The Territorial Peace: Borders, State Development, and International Conflict. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Goemans, H. E. 2006. “Bounded Communities: Territoriality, Territorial Attachment, and Conflict.” In Territoriality and Conflict in an Era of Globalization, eds. Kahler, Miles and Walter, Barbara F.. New York: Cambridge University Press, chapter 2, 25–61.Google Scholar
Goemans, H.E. and Schultz, Kenneth A.. 2014. “Aims, Claims and the Bargaining Model of War.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Goemans, H. E., and Schultz, Kenneth A.. 2015. “The Politics of Territorial Disputes: A Geospatial Approach Applied to Africa.” Unpublished manuscript.Google Scholar
Goertz, Gary, and Diehl, Paul. 1992. Territorial Changes and International Conflict. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul R. 2000. “Territory: Theory and Evidence on Geography and Conflict.” In What Do We Know About War?, ed. Vasquez, John A.. Lanham, MD: Rowman and Littlefield, 57–84.Google Scholar
Hensel, Paul R. 2001. “Contentious Issues and World Politics: The Management of Territorial Claims in the Americas, 1816–1992.” International Studies Quarterly 45: 81–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, Paul R. 2013. “General Codebook: Issue Correlates of War (ICOW) Project.” University of North Texas (Version 1.1).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hensel, Paul R. and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2005. “Issue Indivisibility and Territorial Claims.” GeoJournal 64: 275–85.Google Scholar
Hill, Norman. 1945. Claims to Territory in International Law and Relations. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Hoffman, Philip, and Rosenthal, Jean-Laurent. 1997. “The Political Economy of Warfare and Taxation in Early Modern Europe: Historical Lessons for Economic Development.” The Frontiers of the New Institutional Economics. San Diego, CA: Academic Press, 31–55.Google Scholar
Holsti, Kalevi J. 1991. Peace and War: Armed Conflicts and International Order. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K. 1996. Standing Your Ground. Ann Arbor, MI: Michigan.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K., Croco, Sarah E., and Appel, Benjamin J.. 2011. “Does International Law Promote the Peaceful Settlement of International Disputes? Evidence from the Study of Territorial Conflicts since 1945.” American Political Science Review 105 (2): 415–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul K., Croco, Sarah E., and Appel, Benjamin J.. 2012. “Law and the Use of Force in World Politics: The Varied Effects of Law on the Exercise of Military Power in Territorial Disputes.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 17–31.Google Scholar
Huth, Paul K., Croco, Sarah E, and Appel, Benjamin J.. 2013. “Bringing Law to the Table: Legal Claims, Focal Points, and the Settlement of Territorial Disputes Since 1945.” American Journal of Political Science 57 (1): 90–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul K., and Allee, Todd L.. 2002. The Democratic Peace and Territorial Conflict in the Twentieth Century. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Iivonen, Jyrki. 1990. “Independence or Incorporation.” The Idea of Poland's National Self-Determination and Independence within the Russian and Soviet Socialism from 1870s to the 1920s. Helsinki: Finland by the Finnish Institute of International Affairs.Google Scholar
Imai, Kosuke, Keele, Luke, Tingley, Dustin, and Yamamoto, Teppei. 2011. “Unpacking the Black Box of Causality: Learning about Causal Mechanisms from Experimental and Observational Studies.” American Political Science Review 105 (4): 765–789.Google Scholar
James, Patrick, Park, Johann, and Choi, Seung-Whan. 2006. “Democracy and Conflict Management: Territorial Claims in the Western Hemisphere Revisited.” International Studies Quarterly 50 (4): 803–18.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Karaman, K. Kivanc, and Pamuk, Şevket. 2013. “Different Paths to the Modern State in Europe: The Interaction Between Warfare, Economic Structure, and Political Regime.” American Political Science Review 107 (03): 603–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Keegan, John. 1994. A History of Warfare. New York: Vintage.Google Scholar
Kocs, Stephen A. 1995. “Territorial Disputes and Interstate War, 1945–1987.” Journal of Politics 57 (1): 159–75.Google Scholar
Lee, Hoon, and Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2012. “Foreign Direct Investment and Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 56 (4): 675–703.Google Scholar
Lieven, Dominic. 2002. Empire: The Russian Empire and its Rivals. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Luard, Evan. 1986. War in International Society. London: I.B. Tauris and Company.Google Scholar
Lukowski, Jerzy. 1998. The Partitions of Poland: 1772, 1793, 1795. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
McCallum, J. 1995. “National Borders Matter: Canada-U.S. Regional Trade Patterns.” American Economic Review 85 (3): 615–23.Google Scholar
McNeill, William. 1984. The Pursuit of Power : Technology, Armed Force, and Society since A.D. 1000. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin. 2002. “A Kantian System? Democracy and Third- Party Conflict Resolution.” American Journal of Political Science 46 (4): 749–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mitchell, Sara McLaughlin, and Hensel, Paul R.. 2007. “International Institutions and Compliance with Agreements.” American Journal of Political Science 51 (4): 721–37.Google Scholar
Murphy, Alexander B. 1990. “Historical Justifications for Territorial Claims.” Annals of the Association of American Geographers 80 (4): 531–48.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nussli, C. 2010. “Euratlas Historical Atlas and Gazetteer of Europe.” www.euratlas.com.Google Scholar
Oster, Emily. 2013. “Unobservable Selection and Coefficient Stability: Theory and Validation.” National Bureau of Economic Research. Technical report.Google Scholar
Owsiak, Andrew P. 2013. “Signing Up for Peace: International Boundary Agreements, Democracy, and Militarized Interstate Conflict.” International Studies Quarterly 56 (1): 51–66.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2000. “Increasing Returns, Path Dependence, and the Study of Politics.” American Political Science Review 94 (2): 251–67.Google Scholar
Pierson, Paul. 2004. Politics in Time: History, Institutions and Social Analysis. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prorok, Alyssa K., and Huth, Paul K.. 2015. “International Law and the Consolidation of Peace Following Territorial Changes.” Journal of Politics 77 (1): 161–74.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ragsdale, Hugh, and Ponomarev, Valerii Nikolaevich. 1993. Imperial Russian Foreign Policy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Ratner, Steven R. 1996. “Drawing a Better Line: Uti possidetis and the Borders of New States.” The American Journal of International Law 90 (4): 590–624.Google Scholar
Reed, F. 2008. “Centennia Historical Atlas.” www.historicalatlas.com.Google Scholar
Sahlins, Peter. 1989. Boundaries: The Making of France and Spain in the Pyrenees. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Schultz, Kenneth A. 2014. “Whats in a Claim? De Jure versus De Facto Borders in Interstate Territorial Disputes.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 58 (6): 1059–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Senese, Paul D. 2005. “Territory, Contiguity, and International Conflict: Assessing a New Joint Explanation.” American Journal of Political Science 49 (4): 769–79.Google Scholar
Shaver, Andrew C., Carter, David B. and Shawa, Tsering W.. 2016. “Terrain Ruggedness and Land Cover: Improved Data for All Research Designs.” Conflict Management and Peace Science. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Shaw, Malcolm N. 1996. “The Heritage of States: The Principle of Uti Possidetis Juris Today.” British Yearbook of International Law 67: 75–154.Google Scholar
Simmons, Beth A. 2005. “Rules over Real Estate; Trade, Territorial Conflict and International Borders as Institutions.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 49 (6): 823–48.Google Scholar
Singer, J. David, Bremer, Stuart, and Stuckey, John. 1972. Capability Distribution, Uncertainty, and Major Power War, 1820–1965. Beverly Hills: Sage. Chapter in Peace, War, and Numbers edited by Bruce Russett.Google Scholar
Sprandel, R. 1968. Das Eisengewerbe im Mittelalter. Stuttgart, Germany: A. Hiersemann.Google Scholar
Starr, Harvey, and Most, Benjamin A.. 1976. “The Substance and Study of Borders in International Relations Research.” International Studies Quarterly 20 (4): 581–620.Google Scholar
Stasavage, D. 2011a. States of Credit: Size, Power, and the Development of European Polities. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Stasavage, D. 2011b. “When Distance Mattered: Geographic Scale and the Development of European Representative Assemblies.” American Political Science Review 104 (4): 625–43.Google Scholar
Stevens, Carol. 2013. Russia’s Wars of Emergence 1460-1730. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
Strachan, Hew. 1983. European Armies and the Conduct of War. London: George Allen & Unwin.Google Scholar
Sumner, Brian Taylor. 2004. “Territorial Disputes at the International Court of Justice.” Duke Law Journal 53 (6): 1779–812.Google Scholar
Tilly, Charles. 1992. Coercion, Capital, and European States. Cambridge, MA: Blackwell.Google Scholar
Trefler, Daniel. 1995. “The Case of the Missing Trade and Other Mysteries.” American Economic Review 85 (5): 1029–46.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John. 1995. “Why Do Neighbors Fight? Proximity, Interaction, or Territoriality.” Journal of Peace Research 32 (3): 277–93.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Vasquez, John A. 1993. The War Puzzle. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Vasquez, John, and Henehan, Marie T.. 2001. “Territorial Disputes and the Probability of War, 1816–1992.” Journal of Peace Research 38 (2): 123–38.Google Scholar
Weber, Eugen. 1976. Peasants into Frenchmen: The Modernization of Rural France 1870–1914. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
White, George C. 1999. Nationalism and Territory: Constructing Group Identity in Southeastern Europe. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
Winichakul, Thongchai. 1994. Siam Mapped: A History of the Geo-Body of a Nation. Honolulu, HI: University of Hawaii Press.Google Scholar
Wolf, Nikolaus. 2005. “Path Dependent Border Effects: The Case of Poland’s Reunification (1918–1939).” Explorations in Economic History 42: 414–38.Google Scholar
Wolf, Nikolaus, Schulze, Max-Stephen, and Heinemeyer, Hans-Christian. 2011. “On the Economic Consequences of the Peace: Trade and Borders after Versailles.” Journal of Economic History 71 (4): 915–49.Google Scholar
Womack, Brantly. 2006. China and Vietnam: The Politics of Asymmetry. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Supplementary material: PDF

Abramson and Carter supplementary material

Abramson and Carter supplementary material 1

Download Abramson and Carter supplementary material(PDF)
PDF 3.1 MB
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.