Published online by Cambridge University Press: 01 August 2014
It is impossible accurately to determine whether the more potent line of causation of the recent attack on the orthodox theory of the state is to be found in the field of the developing science of jurisprudence, or in that of practical experience, economic, religious, social, and political, inasmuch as both of these factors are so largely involved. There is reason to think, however, that the more important cause lies in the latter field. The conditions of modern life are changing so rapidly and are becoming daily so much more complex that to many the existing political organization no longer adequately expresses or reflects the social organization behind it. These individuals and groups have in consequence become so discontented with the present system that they have not been satisfied with suggesting new governmental forms and machinery, but failing in their enthusiasm to distinguish state from government, have undertaken in many cases to overthrow the very citadel of the state itself. Nor has the movement halted even at this point, for in this attempt not only has the attack been launched against the nature of the state and of sovereignty, through the calling into question of its two fundamental attributes, unity and absolutism, but the charge has been carried over into the realm of right as well, in the challenging of the right and the justification of the absolute sovereign state.
1 American Economic Review, VII, 210 (1922).
2 Hobson, , National Guilds, 132–133.Google Scholar
3 Ibid., 261.
4 Ibid., 259, 260, 261, 263.
5 Ibid., 258.
6 Cole, , Chaos and Order in Industry, 52.Google Scholar
7 Cole, , Self Government in Industry (ed. 1917), 71.Google Scholar
8 Ibid., 84.
9 Ibid., 95.
10 Ibid., 72.
11 Ibid., 72.
12 Ibid., 82.
13 Ibid., 78.
14 Ibid., 79.
15 Ibid., 78.
16 Ibid., 79.
17 Ibid., 80.
18 Ibid., 87.
19 Ibid., 87.
20 Ibid., 98–99.
21 Ibid., 87–88.
22 Ibid., 98.
23 Cole, , Self Government in Industry (ed. 1920), 20.Google Scholar
24 Cole, , Social Theory, 94.Google Scholar
25 Ibid., 99.
26 Ibid., 86–87.
27 Ibid., 137.
28 Ibid., 139.
29 Cole, , Guild Socialism Re-stated, 122.Google Scholar
30 Hobson, , National Guilds and the State, 102.Google Scholar
31 Ibid., 101.
32 Ibid., 101.
33 Ibid., 52.
34 Ibid., 101.
35 Ibid., 105.
36 Ibid., 101.
37 Ibid., 105.
38 Cole, , Guild Socialism Re-stated, 33.Google Scholar
39 Hobson, , National Guilds and the State, 102–103.Google Scholar
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.