Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T07:53:11.145Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Fortieth Annual Meeting of the American Political Science Association

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Kenneth Colegrove
Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

An abstract is not available for this content so a preview has been provided. As you have access to this content, a full PDF is available via the ‘Save PDF’ action button.
Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
News and Notes
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 39 , Issue 1 , February 1945 , pp. 123 - 166
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1945

References

page 137 note 1 Members of the American Political Science Association may obtain copies at $0.75 each from the Public Affairs Press, 2153 Florida Ave., N.W., Washington, D. C.

page 149 note 1 This report deals with the problems of research. Not only its content but its emphasis is upon facilitating a better research product. For this it offers no apologies. However, it is well at the outset to state explicitly that the Committee thereby intends no reflection upon those members of the Association whose gifts and whose interests lie more in the fields of teaching, administration, or civic activity. We do not regard it as either necessary, appropriate, or even possible to pass judgment on the relative social values of these various outlets for employing the abilities of our colleagues. Quite the contrary, we condemn the tendency in certain institutions to make its faculty conform to a single pattern in emphasis—whether that emphasis be upon research, teaching, administration, or civic activity. Each member of a faculty should, so far as practical considerations allow, feel the maximum freedom to develop his own peculiar genius.

page 151 note 2 The analysis in Section III is largely the work of Carl B. Swisher.

page 160 note 3 A possible exception is the apparent lack of a market for the valuable “interier report,” a characteristic technique among natural scientists in order to obtain the criticism of their colleagues.

page 162 note 4 See this Review, Oct., 1942, pp. 931–945.

Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.