Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-l7hp2 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-27T23:02:13.505Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false

Expenditures and Politics: Who Gets the Cookies?*

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 August 2014

Eric M. Uslaner*
Affiliation:
University of Maryland, College Park

Abstract

Image of the first page of this content. For PDF version, please use the ‘Save PDF’ preceeding this image.'
Type
Communications
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1978

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

*

The comments of Kathleen Peroff, James Homey, Margaret Podolak-Warren, and three anonymous referees are gratefully appreciated.

References

Converse, Philip E. (1964). “The nature of belief systems in mass publics,” pp. 206–61 in Apter, David E., Ideology and Discontent. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
Dye, Thomas R. (1966). Politics, Economics, and the Public. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Fisher, Glenn W. (1964). “Interstate variation in state and local government expenditures.” National Tax Journal, 17: 5774.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Godwin, R. Kenneth and Shepard, W. Bruce (1976). “Political processes and public expenditures: a re-examination based on theories of representative government.” American Political Science Review, 69: 1127–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jackman, Robert W. (1975). Politics and Social Equality. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
Key, V. O. Jr., (1949). Southern Politics in State and Nation. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.Google Scholar
Lockard, Duane (1959). New England State Politics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Sen, A. K. (1970). Collective Choice and Social Welfare. San Francisco: Holden-Day.Google Scholar
Uslaner, Eric M. (forthcoming). “Comparative state policy formation, interparty competition, and malapportionment: a new look at ‘V. O. Key's Hypotheses.’Journal of Politics [no vol. or page known].Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.