Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-dzt6s Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:06:18.215Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Efficient Secrecy: Public versus Private Threats in Crisis Diplomacy

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

SHUHEI KURIZAKI
SHUHEI KURIZAKI
Affiliation:
Texas A&M University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This paper explores when and why private communication works in crisis diplomacy. Conventional audience-cost models suggest that state leaders must go public with their threats in international crises because leaders cannot tie their hands if signals are issued privately. I present a crisis bargaining game where both the sender and the receiver of signals have a domestic audience. The equilibrium analysis demonstrates that a private threat, albeit of limited credibility, can be equally compelling as a fully credible public threat. The analysis suggests that secrecy works in crisis diplomacy despite its informational inefficacy. Secrecy insulates leaders from domestic political consequences when they capitulate to a challenge to avoid risking unwarranted war. The logic of efficient secrecy helps shed light on the unaccounted history of private diplomacy in international crises. The Alaska Boundary Dispute illustrates this logic.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 543 - 558
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Adcock Frank, and D. J. Mosley. 1975. Diplomacy in Ancient Greece. New York: St. Martin's Press.
Austen-Smith David, and Jeffrey S. Banks. 2000. “Cheap Talk and Burned Money.” Journal of Economic Theory 91 (March): 1– 16.Google Scholar
Baum Matthew A. 2004. “Going Private: Public Opinion, Presidential Rhetoric, and the Domestic Politics of Audience Costs in U.S. Foreign Policy Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (October): 603– 31.Google Scholar
Beale Howard K. 1956. Theodore Roosevelt and the Rise of America to World Power. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Blainey Geoffrey. 1988. The Causes of War. 3rd ed. New York: Free Press.
Cai Hongbin. 2000. “Bargaining on Behalf of a Constituency.” Journal of Economic Theory 92 (June): 234– 73.Google Scholar
Cohen Raymond, and Raymond Westbrook. 2000. Amarna Diplomacy: the Beginnings of International Relations. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.
Collin Richard H. 1985. Theodore Roosevelt, Culture, Diplomacy, and Expansion: A New View of American Imperialism. Banton Rouge, LA: Louisiana State University Press.
Crawford Vincent P, and Joel Sobel. 1982. “Strategic Information Transmission.” Econometrica 50 (November): 1431– 51.Google Scholar
Fearon James D. 1994. “Domestic Political Audiences and the Escalation of International Disputes.” American Political Science Review 8 (September): 577– 92.Google Scholar
Fearon James D. 1995. “Rationalist Explanations for War.” International Organization 49 (Summer): 379– 415.Google Scholar
Fearon James D. 1997. “Signaling Foreign Policy Interests: Tying Hands versus Sinking Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 41 (February): 68– 90.Google Scholar
Finel Bernard I, and Kristin M. Lord. 1999. “The Surprising Logic of Transparency.” International Studies Quarterly 43 (June): 315– 39.Google Scholar
Francis R. Douglas, Richard Jones, and Donald B. Smith. 1992. Destinies: Canadian History since Confederation. Second ed. Toronto, Canada: Holt, Rinehart and Winston of Canada.
Groseclose Tim, and Nolan McCarty. 2001. “The Politics of Blame: Bargaining Before an Audience.” American Journal of Political Science 45 (January): 100– 19.Google Scholar
Guisinger Alexandra, and Alastair Smith. 2002. “Honest Threats: the Interaction of Reputation and Political Institutions in International Crises.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 46 (April): 175– 200.Google Scholar
Holmström Bengt, and Roger B. Myerson. 1983. “Efficient and Durable Decision Rules with Incomplete Information.” Econometrica 51 (November): 1799– 819.Google Scholar
Jönsson Christer, and Martin Hall. 2003. “Communication: An Essential Aspect of Diplomacy.” International Studies Perspectives 4 (May): 195– 210.Google Scholar
Kennedy Robert F. 1969. Thirteen Days: A Memoir of the Cuban Missile Crisis. New York: Norton.
Kissinger Henry A. 1979. White House Years. Boston, MA: Little Brown.
Kurizaki Shuhei. 2007. “The Logic of Diplomacy in International Disputes.” Ph.D. diss. University of California, Los Angeles.
Kydd Andrew. 2006. “The Ball is in Your Court: Mediation and Blamecasting.” University of Pennsylvania. Manuscript.
Lauren Paul Gordon. 1994. “Coercive Diplomacy and Ultimata: Theory and Practice in History.” In The Limits of Coercive Diplomacy, ed. Alexander L. George and William E. Simons. second ed. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
Leventoğlu Bahar, and Ahmer Tarar. 2005. “Pre-negotiation Public Commitment in Domestic and International Bargaining.” American Political Science Review 99 (August): 419– 33.Google Scholar
Mattingly Garrett. 1955. Renaissance Diplomacy. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.
Morgenthau Hans J. 1948. Politics Among Nations. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.
Morrow James D. 1989. “Capabilities, Uncertainty, and Resolve: A Limited Information Model of Crisis Bargaining.” American Journal of Political Science 33 (November): 941– 72.Google Scholar
Munro John A. 1970. The Alaska Boundary Dispute. Toronto, Canada: Copp Clark.
Nevins Allan. 1930. Henry White, Thirty Years of American Diplomacy. New York: Harper.
Nicolson Harold. 1954. The Evolution of Diplomatic Method. London: Constable.
Nicolson Harold. 1963. Diplomacy. Third ed. London: Oxford University Press.
O'Neill Barry. 1999. Symbols, Honor, and War. Ann Arbor, MI: University of Michigan Press.
O'Neill Barry. 2003. “Mediating National Honour: Lessons from the Era of Dueling.” Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics 159 (March): 1– 19.Google Scholar
Penlington Norman. 1972. The Alaska Boundary Dispute: A Critical Reappraisal. Toronto: McGraw-Hill Ryerson.
Powell Robert. 1990. Nuclear Deterrence Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Powell Robert. 1999. In the Shadow of Power. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Powell Robert. 2002. “Bargaining Theory and International Conflict.” Annual Review of Political Science 5: 1– 30.Google Scholar
Ramsay Kristopher W. 2004. “Politics at the Water's Edge: Crisis Bargaining and Electoral Competition.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 48 (August): 459– 86.Google Scholar
Sartori Ann. 2005. Deterrence by Diplomacy. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Schelling Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Schultz Kenneth A. 1998. “Domestic Opposition and Signaling in International Crises.” American Political Science Review 92 (December): 829– 44.Google Scholar
Schultz Kenneth A. 2001a. Democracy and Coercive Diplomacy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.
Schultz Kenneth A. 2001b. “Looking for Audience Costs.” Journal of Conflict Resolution 45 (February): 32– 60.Google Scholar
Slantchev Branislav L. 2005. “Military Coercion in Interstate Crises.” American Political Science Review 99 (November): 533– 47.Google Scholar
Smith Alastair. 1998. “International Crises and Domestic Politics.” American Political Science Review 92 (September): 623– 38.Google Scholar
Snyder Glenn H., and Paul Diesing. 1977. Conflict among Nations: Bargaining, Decision Making, and System Structure in International Crises. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Tarar Ahmer, and Bahar Leventoğlu. 2006. “Public Commitment in Crisis Bargaining.” Texas A&M University and Duke University. Unpublished manuscript.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.