Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-gxg78 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T10:44:09.028Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Democratic Theory and Political Science: A Pragmatic Method of Constructive Engagement

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  26 July 2007

ARCHON FUNG
ARCHON FUNG
Affiliation:
Harvard University
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

This article develops two conceptual tools to synthesize democratic theory and the empirical study of institutions. The first is a standard to assess conceptions of democracy called pragmatic equilibrium. A conception of democracy is in pragmatic equilibrium just in case the consequences of its institutional prescriptions realize its values well and better than any other feasible institutional arrangements across a wide range of problems and contexts. Pragmatic equilibrium is a kind of Rawlsian reflective equilibrium. The second is a method of practical reasoning about the consequences of alternative institutional choices that brings conceptions of democracy closer to pragmatic equilibrium. These two ideas are then applied to four conceptions of democracy—minimal, aggregative, deliberative, and participatory—and to two governance problems—deciding rules of political structure and minority tyranny—to show how each conception can improve through reflection on the empirical consequences of various institutional arrangements.

Type
ARTICLES
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 101 , Issue 3 , August 2007 , pp. 443 - 458
Copyright
© 2007 by the American Political Science Association

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Abers Rebecca Neaera. 2000. Reinventing Local Democracy: Grassroots Politics in Brazil. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner Publishers.
Abramson Jeffrey. 2000. We The Jury: The Jury System and the Ideal of Democracy. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Ackerman Bruce. 1991. We the People: Foundations. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Avritzer Leonardo. 2002. Democracy and the Public Space in Latin America. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Avritzer Leonardo. 2003. “New Public Spheres in Brazil: Local Democracy and Deliberative Politics.” Manuscript. <http://www.edesp.edu.br/files/eventos/papers/Avritzer.pdf> (March 20, 2006).
Baiocchi Gianpaolo. 2003. “Participation, Activism, and Politics: The Porto Alegre Experiment.” In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, ed. Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright. London: Verso Press.
Baiocchi Gianpaolo. 2005. Militants and Citizens: The Politics of Participatory Democracy in Porto Alegre. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.
Barber Benjamin. 1984. Strong Democracy: Participatory Politics for a New Age. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Barber Benjamin. 1998. “Three Scenarios for the Future of Technology and Strong Democracy.” Political Science Quarterly 113 (Winter): 573– 89.Google Scholar
Bessette Joseph. 1997. The Mild Voice of Reason: Deliberative Democracy and American National Government. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Black Duncan. 1948. “On the Rationale of Group Decision-Making.” Journal of Political Economy 58 (February): 23– 34.Google Scholar
British Columbia Citizens' Assembly on Electoral Reform. 2004. “Making Every Vote Count: The Case for Electoral Reform in British Columbia.” Final Report. Vancouver, British Columbia.
Bryan Frank. 2004. Real Democracy: The New England Town Meeting and How It Works. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
Cohen Joshua, and Joel Rogers. 1983. On Democracy: Toward a Transformation of American Society. New York: Penguin.
Cohen Joshua. 1989. “Deliberation and Democratic Legitimacy.” In The Good Polity, ed. Alan Hamlin and Philip Pettit. New York: Basil Blackwell: 17– 34.
Cohen Joshua. 1996. “Procedure and Substance in Deliberative Democracy.” In Democracy and Difference, ed. Seyla Benhabib. Princeton: Princeton University Press: 95– 119.
Cohen Joshua, and Sabel Charles. 1997. “Directly-Deliberative Polyarchy.” European Law Journal 3 (December): 313– 42.Google Scholar
Cohen Joshua, and Archon Fung. 2004. “Radical Democracy.” Swiss Journal of Political Science 10 (Winter): 23– 34.Google Scholar
Dahl Robert A. 1961. Who Governs? Power and Democracy in an American City. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl Robert. 1989. Democracy and Its Critics. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Dahl Robert A. 1991. “A Rejoinder.” Journal of Politics 53 (February): 226– 31.Google Scholar
Daniels Norman. 1996. Justice and Justification: Reflective Equilibrium in Theory and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
de Sousa Santos Boaventura. 1998. “Participatory Budgeting in Porto Allegre: Toward a Redistributive Democracy.” Politics and Society 26 (December): 461– 510.Google Scholar
Dewey John. 1896. “The Reflex Arc Concept in Psychology.” Psychological Review 3 (July): 357– 70.Google Scholar
Dewey John. 1954 [1927]. The Public and Its Problems. Athens: Ohio University Press.
Downs Anthony. 1957. An Economic Theory of Democracy. New York: Harper Collins.
Fishkin James. 1995. The Voice of the People. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
Fishkin James, and Luskin Robert. 2004. “Experimenting With a Democratic Ideal: Deliberative Polling and Public Opinion.” Unpublished, Center for Deliberative Democracy, Stanford University and Department of Political Science, University of Texas at Austin.
Freeman Samuel. 2002. “Deliberative Democracy: A Sympathetic Comments.” Philosophy and Public Affairs 29 (October): 371– 418.Google Scholar
Fung Archon. 2004. Empowered Participation: Reinventing Urban Democracy. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Galston William A. 2003. “On the Rapprochement Between Political Philosophy and Empirical Inquiry: A Comment on Rogers Smith.” In The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson. Columbus: Ohio State University Press: 89– 92.
Gastil John. 2000. By Popular Demand: Revitalizing Representative Democracy through Deliberative Elections. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Gerring John, and Joshua Yesnowitz. 2006. “A Normative Turn in Political Science.” Polity 38 (January): 101– 33.Google Scholar
Green Donald, and Ian Shapiro. 1996. Pathologies of Rational Choice Theory: A Critique of Applications in Political Science. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Gutmann Amy, and Dennis Thompson. 1996. Democracy and Disagreement. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Habermas Jürgen. 1996. Between Facts and Norms: Contributions to a Discourse Theory of Law and Democracy, trans. William Rehg. Cambridge: MIT Press.
Hacker Jacob, and Paul Pierson. 2005. Off-Center: The Republican Revolution and the Erosion of American Democracy. New Haven: Yale University Press.
Harman Gilbert. 2004. “Three Trends in Moral and Political Philosophy.” Journal of Value Inquiry 37 (January): 415– 25.Google Scholar
Heller Patrick, and T. M. Thomas Isaac. 2003. “Democracy and Development: Decentralized Planning in Kerala.” In Deepening Democracy: Institutional Innovations in Empowered Participatory Governance, ed. Archon Fung and Erik Olin Wright. London: Verso Press.
James William. 1975 [1907]. Pragmatism in Pragmatism and The Meaning of Truth. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Kateb George. 1981. “The Moral Distinctiveness of Representative Democracy.” Ethics 91 (April): 357– 74.Google Scholar
Knight Jack, and James Johnson. 1996. “Political Consequences of Pragmatism.” Political Theory 24 (February): 68– 96.Google Scholar
Knight Jack, and James Johnson. 1999. “Inquiry into Democracy: What Might a Pragmatist Make of Rational Choice Theories?” American Journal of Political Science 43 (April): 566– 89.Google Scholar
Leib Ethan. 2004. Deliberative Democracy in America: A Proposal for a Popular Branch of Government. University Park, Pennsylvania: Penn State Press.
Lowi Theodore. 1989. The End of Liberalism: The Second Republic of the United States. New York: Norton.
Macedo Stephen et al. 2005. Democracy at Risk: How Political Choices Undermine Citizen Participation, and What We Can Do About It. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.
MacGilvray Eric. 2004. Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Manin Bernard. 2005. “Deliberation: Why We Should Focus on Debate Rather Than Discussion.” Unpublished, Department of Politics, New York University.
Mansbridge Jane. 1980. Beyond Adversary Democracy. New York: Basic Books.
McDonald Michael P. 2004. “A Comparative Analysis of Redistricting Institutions in the United States, 2001–2.” State Politics and Policy Quarterly 4 (Winter): 371– 95.Google Scholar
Mendelberg Tali. 2002. “The Deliberative Citizen: Theory and Evidence.” In Political Decision Making, Deliberation and Participation, ed. Michael X. Delli Carpini, Leonie Huddy, and Robert Shapiro. Oxford:. Elsevier Science: 151– 93.
Mutz Diana C. 2006. Hearing the Other Side: Deliberative versus Participatory Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Nagel Jack H. 1987. Participation. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.
Pateman Carole. 1975. Participation and Democratic Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Pettit Philip. 1997. Republicanism: A Theory of Freedom and Government. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Pierce Charles S. 1878. “How to Make Our Ideas Clear.” Popular Science Monthly 12 (January): 286– 302.Google Scholar
Posner Richard. 2003. Law, Pragmatism, and Democracy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Przeworksi Adam. 1999. “Minimalist Conception of Democracy: A Defense.” In Democracy's Value, ed. Ian Shapiro and Casiano Hacker-Cordon. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 23– 55.
Putnam Hillary. 1995. Words and Life, ed. James Conant. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls John. 1951. “Outline of a Decision Procedure for Ethics.” In Philosophical Review 60 (April): 177– 97.Google Scholar
Rawls John. 1971. A Theory of Justice. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.
Rawls John. 1974. “The Independence of Moral Theory.” Proceedings and Addresses of the American Philosophical Association 48: 5– 22.Google Scholar
Richardson Henry. 1994. Practical Reasoning About Final Ends. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Richardson Henry. 2002. Democratic Autonomy: Public Reasoning About the Ends of Policy. New York: Oxford University Press.
Riker William. 1982. Liberalism Against Populism: A Confrontation Between the Theory of Democracy and the Theory of Social Choice. San Francisco: Freeman.
Sanders Lynn. 1997. “Against Deliberation.” Political Theory 25 (June): 347– 76.Google Scholar
Scanlon T. M. 2002. “Rawls on Justification.” In The Cambridge Companion to Rawls, ed. Samuel Freeman. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 139– 67.
Schumpeter Joseph. 1942. Capitalism, Socialism, and Democracy. New York: Harper and Brothers.
Shapiro Ian. 2002. “Problems, Methods, and Theories in the Study of Politics, Or What's Wrong with Political Science and What To Do About It.” Political Theory 30 (August): 596– 619.Google Scholar
Shapiro Ian. 2003. The State of Democratic Theory. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Shapiro Ian. 2005. The Flight From Reality in the Human Sciences. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Smith Rogers M. 2003. “Reconnecting Political Theory to Empirical Inquiry, or A Return to the Cave.” In The Evolution of Political Knowledge: Theory and Inquiry in American Politics, ed. Edward D. Mansfield and Richard Sisson. Columbus: Ohio State University Press: 60– 88.
Stigler George. 1971. “The Theory of Economic Regulation.” Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science 2 (Spring): 3– 21.Google Scholar
Sunstein Cass. 2000. “Deliberative Trouble? Why Groups Go to Extremes.” Yale Law Journal 110 (October): 71– 119.Google Scholar
Thompson Dennis. 2002. Just Elections: Creating a Fair Electoral Process in the United States. Chicago: Chicago University Press.
Wilson James Q. 1980. The Politics of Regulation. New York: Basic Books.
Young Iris Marion. 2002. Democracy and Inclusion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.