Article contents
The Delimitation and Mensurability of Political Phenomena
Published online by Cambridge University Press: 02 September 2013
Extract
Political science is not a sociological science of everything, a psychological study of all human behavior in all aspects, an anthropological inquiry into miscellaneous human customs, or a philosophy of history. Still less is it a study only of the state, which is a form of social organization resulting from one species of political action, or a study only of governments and the stage properties of law and administration.
Politics is concerned with a field of human behavior characterized by the recurrence of specific behavior patterns. These peculiarly political patterns, however, must not be treated simply as a series of incidents in mere temporal juxtaposition. Human history must be studied as natural history and physical phenomena have been studied, that is to say, with a view to the detection of a recurrence in these patterns, and, hence, of a process in accordance with which, in given total situations, given detailed behavior patterns recur. These patterns are “lines of conduct” of an individual or group character, pursued in relation to other individuals or groups, as a matter of human method in dealing with such situations, which situations arise partly from the nature of the non-human environment, partly from the historical combination of human factors. The resultant specific action or behavior recurs with the recurrence of the stimuli of the approximately recurrent situation; for example, a certain general situation known as “the outbreak of hostilities” has certain specific consequences in changes of individual conduct toward members of a given nation, and the need of putting through a domestic policy against opposition brings into play the ever similar methods of party organization.
- Type
- Research Article
- Information
- Copyright
- Copyright © American Political Science Association 1927
References
1 See the writer's article on “The Doctrine of Power and Party Conflict” in the Review for Nov., 1925.
2 Copeland, M. A., “Desire and Purpose from a Natural-Evolutionary Standpoint,” Psychological Review, July, 1926, p. 249.Google ScholarZnaniecki, F. (Laws of Social Psychology, 1925, pp. 59 ff.)Google Scholar selects the term “social action,” which, however, (a) is defined as an active psychological phenomenon, and (b) involves no implication in itself of an individual center of activity. Hence it may be contended that it has the difficulties without the advantages of the term chosen in the text.
3 Moore, H. T., “Innate Factors in Radicalism and Conservatism,” Jour. of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Oct., 1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allport, F. H. and Hartman, D. A., “Measurement and Motivation of Atypical Opinion in a Certain Group,” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev., Nov., 1925CrossRefGoogle Scholar; Allport, F. H. and Hartman, D. A., “A Technique for the Measurement and Analysis of Public Opinion,” Amer. Jour. of Sociology, July, 1926Google Scholar; Rice, Stuart A., “The Political Vote as a Frequency Distribution of Opinion,” Jour. of Amer. Statistical Assoc., March, 1924CrossRefGoogle Scholar, and “Some Applications of Statistical Method to Political Research,” Amer. Pol. Sci. Rev., May, 1926.
4 Tocqueville, A. de, Democracy in America (ed. by Reeve, ), I, p. 226Google Scholar, quoted in A. N. Holcombe, Political Parties of Today.
5 I. Bowman, “Memorandum on Pioneer Belts,” Annual Report, 1925, Division of Geology and Geography, National Research Council.
6 It is understood that Professor Carr Saunders, of the University of Liverpool, is undertaking an investigation of this subject.
- 2
- Cited by
Comments
No Comments have been published for this article.