Hostname: page-component-6bf8c574d5-w79xw Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2025-02-26T00:22:51.175Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Dante and the Setting for Machiavellianism

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  01 September 1982

Larry Peterman
Larry Peterman*
Affiliation:
University of California, Davis
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Dante and Machiavelli are generally considered exemplars of opposed medieval and modern ways of thinking, there are various points of resemblance in their political arguments. In Dante's Banquet, there is a presentimento machiavellico that illuminates the ideas that form the basis for Machiavellianism. These ideas, in turn, may be seen as extensions of scriptural positions and as Christian modifications of classical attitudes toward hope, certainty, and philosophy.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 76 , Issue 3 , September 1982 , pp. 630 - 644
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1982

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Alighieri, Dante. 1964. Il Convivio. Busnelli, G., and Vandelli, G., eds. Florence: Felice Le Monnier.Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. 1903. The Convivio of Dante Alighieri. Wicksteed, P. H., tr. London: Dent (The Temple Classics).Google Scholar
Alighieri, Dante. 1965. Monarchia. Ricci, P. G., ed. Italy: Arnoldo Mondadori.Google Scholar
Berlin, Isaiah. 1972. The originality of Machiavelli. In Gilmore, M. P., ed., Studies on Machiavelli.. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Boyde, Patrick. 1981. Dante: philomythes and philosopher. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.10.1017/CBO9780511553882CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cantimori, Delio. 1937. Rhetoric and politics in Italian humanism. Journal of the Warburg and Courtauld Institutes I:83–102.10.2307/750048CrossRefGoogle Scholar
D'Entrèves, A. P. 1965. Dante as a political thinker. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
D'Entrèves, A. P. 1967. The notion of the state. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
De LaGarde, George. 1956. La naissance de l'ésprit laïque. Louvain: E. Nauwelaerts.Google Scholar
Ercole, Francesco. 1922. Dante e Machiavelli. Quaderni di Politica 2:5–54.Google Scholar
Ercole, Francesco. 1928. Il pensiero politico di Dante. Milan: Alpes.Google Scholar
Figgis, J. N. 1934. The divine right of kings. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Foster, Kenelm. 1977. The two Dantes. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
Germino, D. 1972. Modern western political thought. Chicago: Rand McNally.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Allan H. 1968. Machiavelli's ‘Prince’ and its forerunners. New York: Barnes and Noble.Google Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1939. The humanist concept of the prince and The Prince of Machiavelli. The Journal of Modern History XI (4): 449–83.10.1086/236395CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gilbert, Felix. 1972. Machiavelli's “Istorie Fiorentine.” In Gilmore, M. P. (ed.), Studies on Machiavelli. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Gilson, Etienne. 1963. Dante and philosophy. Moore, D., tr. New York: Harper and Row.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1976. Discorso o dialogo intorno alla nostra lingua. Sozzi, B. T., ed. Turin: Giulio Einaudi.Google Scholar
Machiavelli, Niccolò. 1960. Il principe e discorsi. Bertelli, S., ed. Milan: Feltrinelli.Google Scholar
MacPherson, C. B. 1964. The political theory of possessive individualism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
McIlwain, Charles. 1932. The growth of political thought in the west. New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. 1979. Machiavelli's new modes and orders. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. 1981. Machiavelli's political science. American Political Science Review 75:293–305.10.2307/1961365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mansfield, Harvey C. Jr. 1972. Party and sect in Machiavelli's Florentine histories. In Fleisher, M., ed. Machiavelli and the nature of political thought. New York: Atheneum.Google Scholar
Martelli, Mario. 1978. Una giarda fiorentina. Rome: Salerno.Google Scholar
Moore, Edward. 1969. Studies in Dante: first series. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. 1942. Dante e la cultura medievale. Bari: Laterza.Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. 1967. Saggi di filosofia dantesca. Florence: La Nuova Italia.Google Scholar
Nardi, Bruno. 1966. Saggi e note di critica dantesca. Milan: R. Ricciardi.Google Scholar
Orwin, Clifford. 1978. Machiavelli's unchristian charity. American Political Science Review 72:1217–28.10.2307/1954535CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Peterman, Larry. 1981. Dante and happiness: a political perspective. Medievalia et Humanistica 10: 81–102.Google Scholar
Peterman, Larry. 1973. Dante's Monarchia and Aristotle's political thought. Studies in Medieval and Renaissance History X:1–40.Google Scholar
Pocock, J. G. A. 1975. The Machiavellian moment. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Prezzolini, Giuseppe. 1970. The Christian roots of Machiavelli's moral pessimism. Review of National Literatures I:26–42.Google Scholar
Quaglio, Antonio E. 1971. Machiavelli. In Bosco, U., ed. Enciclopedia Dantesca III:754–7.Google Scholar
Renaudet, Augustin. 1952. Dante: humaniste. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Renucci, Paul. 1954. Dante: Disciple et juge du monde Gréco-Latin. Paris: Les Belles Lettres.Google Scholar
Ridolfi, Roberto. 1962. Life of Niccolò Machiavelli. Grayson, C., tr. London: Routledge and Kegan Paul.Google Scholar
Strauss, Leo. 1969. Thoughts on Machiavelli. Seattle: University of Washington Press.Google Scholar
Ullman, Walter. 1970. A history of political thought: the middle ages. Baltimore: Penguin.Google Scholar
Vallone, Aldo. 1971. Dante (Storia letteraria d'Italia). Milan: Vallardi.Google Scholar
Vossler, Karl. 1970. Medieval culture. Lawton, W. C., tr. New York: Frederick Ungar.Google Scholar
Weinstein, Donald. 1972. Machiavelli and Savonarola. In Gilmore, M. P., ed. Studies on Machiavelli. Florence: G.C. Sansoni.Google Scholar
Whitfield, J. H. 1978. Dante and the Roman world. Italian Studies XXXIII: 1–19.10.1179/its.1978.33.1.1CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Whitfield, J. H. 1949. Savonarola and the purpose of “The Prince.” The Modern Language Review LXIV: 44–59.10.2307/3716532CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon. 1960. Politics and vision. Boston: Little, Brown.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.