Hostname: page-component-cd9895bd7-lnqnp Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-12-27T09:54:37.677Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Crisis Learning Games

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  02 September 2013

Russell J. Leng
Russell J. Leng
Affiliation:
Middlebury College
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Findings from a data-based study of bargaining in recurrent crises between evenly matched states provide the foundation for the construction of four crisis-learning games. Symmetrical and asymmetrical nuclear and nonnuclear sequential three-by-three games assuming complete information and nonmyopic play are presented and analyzed. The empirical study indicated that states that were unsuccessful in one crisis were likely to move to more coercive bargaining strategies in the next crisis. The four sequential games offer insights as to why this is likely to produce unwanted consequences, while demonstrating the importance of the participants' initial strategy choices. With the realpolitik lessons suggested by the earlier study removed, the dynamics of the games present a case for beginning with a cooperative strategy and moving to reciprocating, or tit-for-tat, bargaining.

Type
Articles
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 82 , Issue 1 , March 1988 , pp. 179 - 194
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 1988

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

References

Axelrod, Robert M. 1984. The Evolution of Cooperation. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1983. Superior Beings: If They Exist, How Would We Know? New York: Springer-Verlag.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J. 1985. Superpower Games: Applying Game Theory to Superpower Conflict. New Haven: Yale University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and Wittman, Donald. 1981. Nonmyopic Equilibria in 2 × 2 Games. Conflict Management and Peace Science 6:39–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Brams, Steven J., and Hessell, Marek P.. 1984. Threat Power in Sequential Games. International Studies Quarterly 28:23–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ellsberg, Daniel. 1959. The Theory and Practice of Blackmail. In Bargaining, ed. Young, Oran. Urbana: University of Illinois.Google Scholar
Esser, J. K., and Komorita, S.. 1975. Reciprocity and Concession Making in Bargaining. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology 31:864–72.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Huth, Paul, and Russett, Bruce. 1987. Deterrence Failure and Crisis Escalation. Paper presented at Conference on Accidental Nuclear War, Vancouver.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1976. Perception and Misperception in International Relations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Jervis, Robert. 1978. Cooperation under the Security Dilemma. World Politics 31:167–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kilgour, D. Marc. 1985. Anticipation and Stability in Two-Person Non-cooperative Games. In Dynamic Models of International Conflict, ed. Luterbacher, Urs and Ward, Michael D.. Boulder: Lynne Rienner.Google Scholar
Kilgour, D. Marc, and Zagare, Frank. 1987. Holding Power in Sequential Games. International Interactions 13:91–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, Russell. 1983. When Will They Ever Learn? Coercive Bargaining in Recurrent Crises. Journal of Conflict Resolution 27:379–419.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, Russell J. 1984. Reagan and the Russians: Crisis Bargaining Beliefs and the Historical Record. American Political Science Review 78:338–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Leng, Russell J., and Singer, J. D.. N.d. Militarized International Crises: The BCOW Typology and Its Applications. International Studies Quarterly. Forthcoming.Google Scholar
Leng, Russell, and Wheeler, Hugh. 1979. Influence Strategies, Success, and War. Journal of Conflict Resolution 23:655–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Osgood, Charles E. 1962. An Alternative to War or Surrender. Urbana: University of Illinois Press.Google Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1987, Crisis Bargaining, Escalation, and MAD. American Political Science Review 81:717–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Powell, Robert. 1988. Nuclear Brinkmanship with Two-Sided Incomplete Information. American Political Science Review 82:155–78.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schelling, Thomas C. 1966. Arms and Influence. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
Snyder, Glenn, and Diesing, Paul. 1977. Conflict among Nations. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Zagare, Frank. 1984. Limited Move Equilibria in 2 × 2 Games. Theory and Decision 16:1–19.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagare, Frank. 1985. Toward a Reformulation of the Theory of Mutual Deterrence. International Studies Quarterly 29:155–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zagare, Frank. 1986. The Dynamics of Deterrence. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.