Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-t7czq Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T21:34:06.075Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

“Contesting the Empire of Habit”: Habituation and Liberty in Lockean Education

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  15 November 2016

RITA KOGANZON
RITA KOGANZON*
Affiliation:
Harvard University
*
Rita Koganzon is Associate Director of the Program on Constitutionalism and Democracy and Lecturer in the Politics Department, University of Virginia ([email protected]), Gibson Hall, 1540 Jefferson Park Ave, Charlottesville, VA 22904.
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although John Locke's educational curriculum has traditionally been seen to aim at creating free citizens capable of independent thought, the centrality of habituation to his pedagogy has recently raised concerns that the Education is no more than “indoctrination” for compliant subjects. I argue here that by re-examining habituation in light of Locke's epistemology, we find that Locke's education does aim at freedom, but that this freedom requires a strong will and a cultivated skepticism. The habits which Locke asks parents to instill are aimed not at programming specific behavior and opinions, but rather at training children to “cross their desires” to strengthen their wills against the impositions of nature, custom, and fashion, which Locke argues pose an far more serious threat to independent thought than parental discipline. Locke's education aims to cultivate a skeptical mental disposition that permits individuals to resist these other sources of habit and to continually question and revise their own convictions.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 110 , Issue 3 , August 2016 , pp. 547 - 558
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2016 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I'm grateful to Harvey Mansfield, Jennifer Page, Will Selinger, Richard Tuck, and Sebastian Waisman for their helpful comments on earlier versions of this article. I would also like to thank Ruth Grant and the other participants in the 2015 Duke Graduate Political Theory conference, as well as the reviewers at the American Political Science Review for their instructive objections and suggestions for improving this article.

References

REFERENCES

Aronson, Jason. 1959. “Shaftesbury on Locke.” American Political Science Review 53, 1101–4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Axtell, James. 1968. The Educational Writings of John Locke. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Baltes, John. 2013. “Locke's Inverted Quarantine: Discipline, Panopticism, and the Making of the Liberal Subject.” Review of Politics 75, 175–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Button, Mark. 2008. Contract, Culture, and Citizenship. University Park, PA: Pennsylvania State University Press.Google Scholar
Carrig, Joseph. 2001. “Liberal Impediments to Liberal Education: The Assent to Locke.” Review of Politics 63, 41–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Casson, Douglas. 2011. Liberating Judgment: Fanatics, Skeptics, and John Locke's Politics of Probability. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Colman, John. 1983. John Locke's Moral Philosophy. Edinburgh: Edinburgh University Press.Google Scholar
Dawson, Hannah. 2007. Locke, Language and Early-Modern Philosophy. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Dunn, John. 1989. “‘Bright Enough for All Our Purposes': John Locke's Conception of a Civilized Society.” Notes and Records of the Royal Society of London, 43, 133–53.Google Scholar
Forde, Steven. 2013. Locke, Science, and Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Gay, Peter. 1964. John Locke on Education. New York: Teacher's College Bureau of Publications.Google Scholar
Grant, Ruth. 2012. “John Locke on Custom's Power and Reason's Authority” Review of Politics 74, 607–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Grant, Ruth. 1987. John Locke's Liberalism. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Hobbes, Thomas. 1994. Leviathan, ed. Curley, Edwin. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1858. “Additions to the Essay.” ed. King, Peter, The Life and Letters of John Locke. London: Henry Bohn, 359.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1979. Essay Concerning Human Understanding, ed. Nidditch, Peter. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1983. Letter Concerning Toleration, ed. Tully, James. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. “Second Treatise.” In Two Treatises of Government, ed. Peter Laslett. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 265–428.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Locke, John. 1996. Some Thoughts Concerning Education and On the Conduct of the Understanding, eds. Tarcov, Nathan and Grant, Ruth. Indianapolis: Hackett.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1968. “Some Thoughts Concerning Reading and Study for a Gentleman.” ed. Axtell, James, The Educational Writings of John Locke. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 397–404.Google Scholar
Locke, John. 1988. Two Treatises of Government, ed. Laslett, Peter. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mehta, Uday. 1992. The Anxiety of Freedom. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Neill, Alex. 1989. “Locke on Habituation, Autonomy, and Education.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 27, 225–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Savonius-Wroth, S.-J. 2010. “Education and Its Role in Civil Society.” The Continuum Companion to Locke. New York: Bloomsbury, 139–40.Google Scholar
Schuurman, Paul. 2001. “Locke's Way of Ideas as Context for his Theory of Education in Of the Conduct of the Understanding .” History of European Ideas 27, 45–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Scott, John. 2000. “The Sovereignless State and Locke's Language of Obligation.” American Political Science Review 94, 547–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Tarcov, Nathan. 1984. Locke's Education for Liberty. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.Google Scholar
Tully, James. 1993. Locke in Contexts. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Yolton, John. 1971. John Locke and Education. New York: Random House.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.