Hostname: page-component-586b7cd67f-vdxz6 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-11-28T17:50:43.610Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Between Means and Ends: Reconstructing Coercion in Dewey's Democratic Theory

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  19 June 2017

ALEXANDER LIVINGSTON
ALEXANDER LIVINGSTON*
Affiliation:
Cornell University
*
Alexander Livingston is Assistant Professor, Department of Government, Cornell University, Ithaca, NY ([email protected])
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

John Dewey's democratic theory is celebrated as a classic statement of the theory of deliberative democracy. This article challenges deliberative appropriations of Dewey's political thought by situating his democratic theory within the contentious history of American labor politics. In his writings on direct action, strikes, and class struggle, Dewey advocated coercive and nondeliberative modes of political action as democratic means for democratic ends. Examining Dewey's writings on democracy, action, and the use of force reveals how a means-oriented pragmatism circumvents the problematic dichotomy of ideal ends and non-ideal means framing contemporary debates about idealism and realism in democratic theory. Pragmatism's account of the interdependence of means and ends in political action, as a process of creative and collaborative experimentation, combines a robust defense of coercive tactics with a consequentialist critique of violence.

Type
Research Article
Information
American Political Science Review , Volume 111 , Issue 3 , August 2017 , pp. 522 - 534
Copyright
Copyright © American Political Science Association 2017 

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

I would like thank Gerry Berk, Robin Celikates, Sam Chambers, Simone Chambers, Ani Chen, Çiğdem Çidam, Rom Coles, Jeff Flynn, Dennis Galvan, Ayten Gündoğdu, Jason Frank, Jill Frank, Burke Hendrix, Gary Herrigel, Nicolas Jabko, Colin Koopman, Erin Pineda, Ed Quish, and Adam Sheingate for sharing their comments and criticisms on earlier drafts of this essay, as well as my anonymous reviewers, and Leigh Jenco for her insightful editorial guidance.

References

REFERENCES

Addams, Jane. 2002. “A Modern Lear.” In The Jane Addams Reader, ed. Elshtain, Jean Bethke. New York, NY: Basic Books. 163–176.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 1998. The Human Condition. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Arendt, Hannah. 2005. “The Ivory Tower of Common Sense.” In Essays in Understanding 1930–1954, ed. Kohn, Jerome. New York, NY: Shocken. 194–196.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 1999. “Democracy as Inquiry, Inquiry as Democratic: Pragmatism, Social Science, and the Cognitive Division of Labor,” American Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 590–607.Google Scholar
Bohman, James. 2004. “Realizing Deliberative Democracy as a Mode of Inquiry: Pragmatism, Social Facts, and Normative Theory,” Journal of Speculative Philosophy 18 (1): 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bondurant, Joan. 1998. Conquest of Violence: The Gandhian Philosophy of Conflict, new edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Bourne, Randolph. 1992. “Twilight of the Idols.” In The Radical Will: Selected Writings, 1911–1918, ed. Hansen, Olaf. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press. 336–48.Google Scholar
Brecher, Jeremy. 1972. Strike! San Francisco, CA: Straight Arrow Books.Google Scholar
Buhle, Paul. 2013. Marxism in the United States: A History of the American Left, third edition. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Case, Clarence Marsh. 1923. Non-Violent Coercion: A Study in Methods of Social Pressure. New York, NY: The Century Co.Google Scholar
Caspary, William R. 2000. Dewey on Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Caspary, William R. 2003. “‘One and the Same Method’: John Dewey's Thesis of Unity of Method in Ethics and Science,” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 39 (3): 445–468.Google Scholar
Dalton, Dennis. 2000. “Gandhi's Originality.” In Gandhi, Freedom, and Self-Rule, ed. Parel, Anthony J.. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books. 63–86.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1935. “Liberalism Twenty Years Later,” The New Republic 81 (January 23): 290–292.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1977. “Does Reality Possess a Practical Character?” In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 4: 1907–9, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 125– 142.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1980a. “Conscience and Compulsion.” In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 10: 1916–17, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 260–264.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1980b. “Force and Coercion.” In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 10: 1916–17, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 244–251.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1980c. “Force, Violence, and Law.” In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 10: 1916–17, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 211–215.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1982. Reconstruction in Philosophy . In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 12: 1920, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 77–202.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1983. Human Nature and Conduct . In The Middle Works, 1899–1924. Vol. 14: 1922, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–234.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984a. The Public and Its Problems . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 2: 1928–29, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 235–372.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984b. The Quest for Certainty . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 4: 1929, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–250.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1984c. Individualism Old and New . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 5: 1929–1930, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 41–144.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1985a. “Social Science and Social Control.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 6: 1931–1932, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 64–68.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1985b. Ethics . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 7: 1932, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–462.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1986a. “Why I Am Not a Communist.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 9: 1933–34, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 91–95.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1986b. “Intelligence and Power.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 9: 1933–34, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 107–112.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1986c. Logic: The Theory of Inquiry . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 12: 1938, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–528.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987a. Art as Experience . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 10: 1934, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–366.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987b. “Democracy is Radical.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 11: 1935–1937, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 296–300.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987c. Liberalism and Social Action . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 11: 1935–1937, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 1–66.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987d. “The Future of Liberalism.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 11: 1935–1937, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 258–260.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987e. “A Liberal Speaks Out for Liberalism.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 11: 1935–1937, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 282– 288.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1987f. “The Future of Liberalism.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 11: 1935–1937, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 289–295.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988a. “The Economic Basis of the New Society.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 13: 1938–39, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 309– 322.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988b. Freedom and Culture . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 13: 1938–39, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 63–188.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988c. “Means and Ends.” In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 13: 1938–39, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 349–354.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. 1988d. Theory of Valuation . In The Later Works, 1925–1953. Vol. 13: 1938–39, ed. Boydston, Jo Ann. Carbondale, IL: Southern Illinois University Press. 189–254.Google Scholar
Dewey, John. n.d. The Correspondence of John Dewey, 1871–1952 (Electronic Edition). Vol. 1: 1871–1918. Charlottesville, VA: InteLex PastMasters.Google Scholar
Diggins, John Patrick. 1994. The Promise of Pragmatism: Modernism and the Crisis of Knowledge and Authority. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Dryzek, John. 2000. Deliberative Democracy and Beyond: Liberals, Critics, Contestations. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Michael. 1998. Transforming Experience: John Dewey's Cultural Instrumentalism. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press.Google Scholar
Eldridge, Michael. 2002. “The Teacher Union's Fight and the Scope of Dewey's Logic.” In Dewey's Logical Theory: New Studies and Interpretations, eds. Burke, F. Thomas, Hester, D. Micah, and Talisse, Robert B.. Nashville, TN: Vanderbilt University Press. 262–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Farr, James. 1999. “John Dewey and American Political Science,” American Journal of Political Science 43 (2): 520–541.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Feffer, Andrew. 2005. “The Presence of Democracy: Deweyan Exceptionalism and Communist Teachers in the 1930s,” Journal of the History of Ideas 66 (1): 79–97.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew. 2001. “Inquiry as Critique: On the Legacy of Deweyan Pragmatism for Political Theory,” Political Studies 49 (4): 730–748.Google Scholar
Festenstein, Matthew. 2004. “Deliberative Democracy and Two Models of Pragmatism,” European Journal of Social Theory 7: 291–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Geuss, Raymond. 2001. History and Illusion in Politics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
Gutmann, Amy and Thompson, Dennis. 2004. Why Deliberative Democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Hildreth, R.W. 2009. “Reconstructing Dewey on Power,” Political Theory 37 (6): 780–807.Google Scholar
Hildreth, R.W. 2012. “Word and Deed: A Deweyan Integration of Deliberative and Participatory Democracy,” New Political Science 34 (3): 295–320.Google Scholar
Holmes, John Hayne. 1920. Is Violence the Way Out of Our Industrial Disputes? New York, NY: Dodd, Mead, and Company.Google Scholar
Honneth, Axel. 1998. “Democracy as Reflexive Cooperation: John Dewey and the Theory of Democracy Today,” Political Theory 26 (6): 763–783.Google Scholar
Jewett, Andrew. 2011. “Canonizing Dewey: Columbia Naturalism, Logical Empiricism, and the Idea of American Philosophy,” Modern Intellectual History 8 (1): 91–125.Google Scholar
Knight, Jack and Johnson, James. 2011. The Priority of Democracy: Political Consequences of Pragmatism. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Kosnoski, Jason. 2005. “Artful Discussion: John Dewey's Classroom as a Model of Deliberative Association,” Political Theory 33 (5): 654–677.Google Scholar
Latour, Bruno. 1999. Pandora's Hope: Essays on the Reality of Science Studies. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Livingston, Alexander. 2016. Damn Great Empires! William James and the Politics of Pragmatism. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
MacGilvray, Eric. 2005. Reconstructing Public Reason. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane with Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Estlund, David, Føllesdal, Andrews, Fung, Archon, Lafont, Cristina, Manin, Bernard, and Martí, José Luis. 2010. “The Place of Self-Interest and the Role of Power in Deliberative Democracy,” Journal of Political Philosophy 18 (1): 64–100.Google Scholar
Mansbridge, Jane with Bohman, James, Chambers, Simone, Christiano, Thomas, Fung, Archon, Parkinson, John, Thompson, Dennis F., and Warren, Mark E.. 2012. “A Systemic Approach to Deliberative Democracy.” In Deliberative Systems: Deliberative Democracy at the Large Scale, eds. Parkinson, John and Mansbridge, Jane. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. 1–26.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2012a. “Another Realism: The Politics of Gandhian Nonviolence,” American Political Science Review 106 (2): 455–470.Google Scholar
Mantena, Karuna. 2012b. “Gandhi and the Means-Ends Question in Politics.” Occasional Papers of the School of Social Sciences no. 46, Institute for Advanced Studies, Princeton University, Princeton, NJ. 1–25. https://www.sss.ias.edu/files/papers/paper46.pdf Google Scholar
Marres, Noortje. 2005. “Issues Spark a Problem into Being: A Key but Often Forgotten Point in the Lippmann-Dewey Debate.” In Making Things Public: Atmospheres of Democracy, eds. Latour, Bruno and Weibel, Peter. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. 208– 17.Google Scholar
Medearis, John. 2005. “Social Movements and Deliberative Democratic Theory,” British Journal of Political Science 35: 53– 75.Google Scholar
Medearis, John. 2015. Why Democracy is Oppositional. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
Mills, C. Wright. 1969. Sociology and Pragmatism: The Higher Learning in America. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
Mouffe, Chantal. 1996. “Deconstruction, Pragmatism, and the Politics of Democracy.” In Deconstruction and Pragmatism, ed. Mouffe, Chantal. New York, NY: Routledge. 1–12.Google Scholar
Mumford, Lewis. 1926. The Golden Day: A Study of American Experience and Culture. New York, NY: Horace Liveright.Google Scholar
Myers, Ella. 2013. Worldly Ethics: Democratic Politics as Care for the World. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
Niebuhr, Reinhold. 2013. Moral Man and Immoral Society: A Study in Ethics and Politics, new edition. Louisville, KY: Westminster John Knox.Google Scholar
Ottanelli, Fraser. 1991. The Communist Party of the United States from the Depression to World War 2. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
Phelps, Christopher. 1997. Young Sidney Hook: Marxist and Pragmatist. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Rogers, Melvin L. 2009. The Undiscovered Dewey: Religion, Morality, and the Ethos of Democracy. New York, NY: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
Rorty, Richard. 1982. Consequences of Pragmatism: Essays, 1972–1980. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minneapolis Press.Google Scholar
Ryan, Alan. 1997. John Dewey and the High Tide of American Liberalism. New York, NY: W.W. Norton.Google Scholar
Stears, Marc. 2007. “Liberalism and the Politics of Compulsion,” British Journal of Political Science 37: 533–553.Google Scholar
Stears, Marc. 2010. Demanding Democracy: American Radicals in Search of a New Politics. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. 2007. Terrorism and Communism. London, UK: Verso.Google Scholar
Trotsky, Leon. 1973. “Their Morals and Ours.” In Their Morals and Ours: Marxist vs. Liberal Views on Morality, ed. Novak, George. New York, NY: Pathfinder Press. 13–52.Google Scholar
Walzer, Michael. 1970. “Civil Disobedience and Corporate Authority.” In Obligations: Essays on Disobedience, War, and Citizenship. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. 24–45.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 1991. John Dewey and American Democracy. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Westbrook, Robert B. 2005. Democratic Hope: Pragmatism and the Politics of Truth. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
Wolin, Sheldon S. 2004. Politics and Vision: Continuity and Innovation in Western Political Thought, expanded edition. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
Young, Iris Marion. 2001. “Activist Challenges to Deliberative Democracy,” Political Theory 29 (5): 670–690.Google Scholar
Submit a response

Comments

No Comments have been published for this article.